Ric Moore wrote:
On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 00:13 +, g wrote:
snip
most 'gmail' that comes thru list is 'rich text'.
a lot of folks who use gmail, hotmail, and other 'free' email, ---
will not bother to set configs and are usually there to hide. ---
This bit above. and are usually there to
David Boles wrote:
The paranoia factor maybe? ;-)
ric just may be paranoid. using gmail, asking twice.
started to see for sure, ie, ask a third time. ;o)
--
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world with out fences, who needs gates...
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
Steve Lindemann wrote:
Mike Wright wrote:
snip
And, while I abhore html mail,
you use thunderbird and do not mind out of line sigs. :o)
Steve Lindemann __
Network Administrator //\\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Marmot Library Network, Inc. \\//
Roger Heflin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Mike Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
It seems that there are many clueless people who could never write a web
page but seem to feel more than qualified to send html mail. I am tired of
squinting at itty bitty fonts that are
David Boles wrote:
Ric Moore wrote:
On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 00:13 +, g wrote:
David Boles wrote:
Roger Heflin wrote:
snip
And that bad news for us is those clueless people are developers
that develop email programs and really don't have a clue what they
are doing, but certainly think
Roger Heflin wrote:
David Boles wrote:
Hotmail I would probably agree with, but both gmail and yahoo provide
higher end paid for service if you want it, and both yahoo and gmail are
sub-contractors for a number of ISP's mail systems.
I am on gmail because my ISP's email had enough issues
On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 00:13 +, g wrote:
geoDavid Boles wrote:
Roger Heflin wrote:
snip
And that bad news for us is those clueless people are developers that
develop email programs and really don't have a clue what they are
doing, but certainly think they do.
Ric Moore wrote:
I don't get that. Please explain. Ric
which?
check time stamps of my post and your post and change made.
^v, ^u, what ever. [if does not answer, insert what where]
later.
--
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
--
fedora-list mailing list
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Mike Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
It seems that there are many clueless people who could never write a web
page but seem to feel more than qualified to send html mail. I am tired of
squinting at itty bitty fonts that are rendered by Thunderbird
Mike Wright wrote:
Hi all,
It seems that there are many clueless people who could never write a
web page but seem to feel more than qualified to send html mail. I am
tired of squinting at itty bitty fonts that are rendered by
Thunderbird whenever it displays html email. (List denizens,
On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:32:44 -0700
Mike Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A hearty toast to whomever can solve this one.
I can't solve it for thunderbird, but the reason I use
claws-mail is because it has no html support at all.
You have to go to a lot of trouble to turn on html
by activating
Roger Heflin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Mike Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does anybody know how to make Thunderbird display only the text/plain
portion of multipart email?
Maybe:
view - message body as - plain text
And that bad news for us is those clueless people are
Mike Wright wrote:
Does anybody know how to make Thunderbird display only the text/plain
portion of multipart email?
As already mentioned: a quick ALT-V-B-P will set plain text viewing for
all messages. Don't forget to disallow the default viewing of images in
messages too.
Another
David Boles wrote:
Roger Heflin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Mike Wright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
It seems that there are many clueless people who could never write a
web page but seem to feel more than qualified to send html mail.
Roger Heflin wrote:
David Boles wrote:
Roger Heflin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Mike Wright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
It seems that there are many clueless people who could never write a
web page but seem to feel more than qualified
David Boles wrote:
Roger Heflin wrote:
David Boles wrote:
Roger Heflin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Mike Wright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
It seems that there are many clueless people who could never
write a
web page but seem to
Roger Heflin wrote:
David Boles wrote:
Roger Heflin wrote:
David Boles wrote:
Roger Heflin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Mike Wright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
It seems that there are many clueless people who could never
write a
17 matches
Mail list logo
