/mirror/fedora-core/beta/i386 Package
area
http://support.intcomgrp.com/mirror/fedora-core/beta/src
Package source area
GCC Update
- --
Not as close as I'd like it to be. I got past one problem and another
problem has shown up. Now in building c++flint
James Kosin
a member; what can I do to help with things? Or what do I
need to do?
My account is JamesKosin ...
Thanks,
James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFC6R
ideally take another path.
I'd like to help; but, have only limited free time on my busy
schedule. I'm trying to get a GCC update setup and working. only
problem is now I think there are package problems... Compiling
completes correctly now.
James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
kernel you can boot from and try
carefully.
Good Luck,
James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFC8jLkkNLDmnu1kSkRApnoAJ0SCEWiLl2cuHt3IUfHMLPGd1mtcACePq60
upRSVzrrZhWUKEzhW+sjWnQ=
=zFkJ
believe where kept from the old gcc
version. One patch was already applied and one did not agree with the
new changes.
I fixed my problems building the package. The last thing was
documentation being replaced.
Thanks,
James Kosin
REMEBER, my updates are NOT SUPPORTED BY REDHAT or FEDORA CORE.
If you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Again,
-
-
JAMES' Unofficial Unsupported by RedHat, Redhat Fedora Core, and
Redhat Fedora Legacy Groups!
~Any support for my packages, will only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
| On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, HaJo Schatz wrote:
|
| James, I truly appreciate your efforts to get latest versions of
| critical packages out.
|
| However,
| [...]
|
| SpamAssassin 3.0.4
| --
|
| [...]
|
| I'd
!
==
Thanks
James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDKxWIkNLDmnu1kSkRA66bAJ9tpyEz3Zb5lHqk+fQYGlavHFUA/gCaA79z
xIwabr8Y/r9X8kEiLw0hNfM=
=8hMt
-END PGP
.src.rpm
New BINARY RPM
- --
http://support.intcomgrp.com/mirror/fedora-core/beta/i386/spamassassin-3.1.0-1.fc1.i386.rpm
I caught this on Friday; but, couldn't get a patch done quick enough
to get it out then.
Sorry again,
James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
/fedora-core/beta/i386/perl-Net-DNS-0.45-3.fc1.i386.rpm
Sorry again,
James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDMBzTkNLDmnu1kSkRAzkxAJ9UPwzc/kh1JE7GdgkfgJCCNpDxTwCeIQ92
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
David Eisenstein wrote:
|On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, James Kosin wrote:
|
|This may be easier than writing a long detailed email all the time.
|Everyone can get / see updates via my newly created web-page at
|~http://support.intcomgrp.com/~jkosin
to binutils
http://beta.support.intcomgrp.com/mirror/fedora-core/beta/src/binutils-2.16.1-1.fc1.src.rpm
I'm also willing to make changes / patches to the versions I have if
there are any problems.
Thanks,
James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
James Kosin wrote:
Ok,
I would like to know how to submit a package for FC1 to be
updated... Of course, not through the normal means of patching the
existing version; but, a new build.
In particualar, the gcc package I've built for 3.3.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Rex Dieter wrote:
James Kosin wrote:
I would like to know how to submit a package for FC1 to be updated...
Of course, not through the normal means of patching the existing
version; but, a new build.
In particualar, the gcc package I've
adding people, but I see that it just isn't going to happen.
David, I had tagged you as one I was going to invite.
I will be making private invitations to join the build team over the
next week or so.
I'm willing to help with building as well.
Let me know.
James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
if they do have a
PHP document configuring some of these administrative tasks open on
the internet.
Thanks,
James Kosin
- - --
- - --
James Kosin
International Communications Group, Inc.
230 Pickett's Line
Newport News, VA 23603-1366
- - - United States of America -
Phone: 1(757)947-1030 ext
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Jim Popovitch wrote:
Another? Heck, that's old stuff from quite some time (Internet
time) ago. If I had a nickel for every invalid file access
attempt. ;-)
-Jim P.
James Kosin wrote:
--snip--
I'm not all that worried about invalid
system... Then import the fedora-legacy keys.
Or maybe someone could resign all the packages with the fedora-legacy key.
James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDcLBIkNLDmnu1kSkRAwDcAJoC86
to be fixed if we are
vulnerable.
James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDcmfnkNLDmnu1kSkRA39pAKCABlO6P3J7EVRAG6oefeclrPDEEwCeI2w0
U65qbkAwaJhCVlc+nNLt3ao=
=11iK
-END PGP SIGNATURE
packages
don't have.
Ok, FC1 already has the patch for CAN-2005-1921
All be need to do is add the patch for RHSA-2005:748-05
I'll have to compare the patches to be sure.
James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:19:35PM -0500, James Kosin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:22:28AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
Does look like we need to patch this. RHEL issued an update,
Do you mean that one from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:19:35PM -0500, James Kosin wrote:
SNIP
We could base our build for FC1 from the patches in FC3... If and
only if, we are allowed to update some packages inside to newer
versions. FC3
.legacy
openssl-0.9.7a-33.13.legacy
Are there any updates FL can do to any of the packages to fix/block slapper
from an FC1 machine?
Michael.
Michael,
Try my version of httpd here:
http://support.intcomgrp.com/~jkosin
It has been effective against the worm so far.
James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Keating wrote:
James, what is in your package that we haven't included in our Apache?
I was under the assumption that we had fixed all the CVEs related to the
slapper worm and that our users were safe. If this isn't the case, we
have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 17:11 -0500, James Kosin wrote:
My version takes care of the mod_ssl issue he already disabled. FC1
doesn't have a fix or if so it hasn't gone through QA yet.
Do you have a CVE for the ssl issue? I'd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McCarty wrote:
--snip--
$ ps -A | grep pache
$ ps -A | grep ssl
doesn't show anything, so Apache isn't running, and I guess
SSL isn't either.
Mike
Mike,
ps -A | grep httpd /* Apache is only the name of the server
for FC1. I
could also always start with the kernel, if that is OK. I've gotten
very good with my own package and it seems to be simpler than say perl
or many of the more complex builds.
Thanks,
James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy/QATesting.
OK,
It is a little buried in the clutter. I've seen this page many times,
but never really dig-ed into it.
I'm printing this stuff out for further review.
Thanks,
James
description.
Even something like follow these steps or procedures
James Kosin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFD8i+7kNLDmnu1kSkRAu6zAJ4874rS9Xfly2zdxapfWJecy7ObuQCffu8j
7Kz9ON76BJye21LktA4fJtk=
=qJij
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Temple wrote:
But looking at the download site, it /looks/ as though the x86_64 rpms
are there.
(Not so for core 2).
Does the site need this updated?
Matt,
Good point; but, they may be holding off updating this fact until we see
the
go
on and on about this point.
Just my 2-cents,
James Kosin
--
Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 16:17 -0600, Mike Klinke wrote:
There is instead an entry in /usr/lib; sendmail.sendmail which
is linked to /usr/sbin/sendmail. Also the man pages no longer work
if you type; man sendmail You have to use man
sendmail.sendmail.
This
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 13:43 -0500, James Kosin wrote:
Sounds like something didn't get built correctly. Was this a new
release of sendmail or a patch?
I believe my packages needed (or at least I let them build a -cf
package) at one point. My version has been working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Yates wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2006, James Kosin wrote:
I agree with Jesse here; but, I would like to add that the
packages should be tested on the released platform by someone and
not just released in this case. SendMail was a recent blunder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok,
Normally, I'm very patient. But, this just rubs me the wrong way.
Have we lost sight of our purpose? This is Fedora Legacy, which
supports older unsupported versions past their 6-month window with
Fedora group. I think the support if too
fight the powers that
be and I have advanced notice, which gives me time to prepare.
- -James Kosin
Long time FC1 user, and proud supporter of RedHat / Fedora.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Gibson wrote:
Anyone know if this is being worked on?
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-1173
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bo Lynch wrote:
Just read about the end of life of FC1 and FC2 on the fedoralegacy page. I
understand that there will be no more bug fixes for these OS's, but does
that mean that there will bo no more security fixes as well?
Yes, it means NO MORE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Monday 14 August 2006 16:06, Eric Rostetter wrote:
This page needs to be updated to reflect FC1 and FC2 being retired...
Whoops! Thanks for catching that. (I added the FC4 too)
Jesse,
I believe RH9 was retired many
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Thome wrote:
David,
Sounds like a good thing entering it into Bugzilla, however, if
there is not a priority within Red Hat to fix it, the bug will sit
there and rot... Might be a good time to split the bugzilla between
active devlopment and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Stevens wrote:
a confession of inadequacy is more of a preliminary than an answer
Dave
Sorry, to butt in
Maybe, what we need to do is have a re-organization of the idea of
FedoraLegacy instead of trying to overtax anyone. Or chase
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Keating wrote:
See my blog regarding the future of Legacy as a project. Please remember
these are just proposals and not final solutions. A wiki page will follow
soon.
http://jkeating.livejournal.com/#entry_34659
I hope this doesn't
Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Hi,
I definitively can't force cp to override existing files without
asking confirmation.
According to documentation , I try :
cp -r --force src/file1 ./
but always a confirmation is asked...
What's wrong ?
'cp -r --reply=yes src/file1 ./'
This will work... Check
wwp wrote:
Hello James,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:43:48 -0400 James Kosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Hi,
I definitively can't force cp to override existing files without asking
confirmation.
According to documentation , I try :
cp -r --force src/file1
Beartooth Sciurivore wrote:
Every new computer I've yet had has begun slowing down soon after
I get it -- probably because I keep several browsers open, with from
several to many tabs each. I've learned long since to make sure each
machine has all the memory it can handle from the git-go,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:56:25 -0400,
James Kosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having TOO much swap space can be a detriment and not an asset.
Usually, the rule of thumb I go by is allocate about 2x the amount of
physical memory installed on the system
Everyone,
The DNS attacks are starting!!!
Below is a snippet of a logwatch from last night. Be sure all DNS
servers are updated if at all possible. The spooks are out in full on
this security vulnerability in force.
THIS IS YOUR LAST WARNING...!!!
Patch or Upgrade NOW!
James Kosin
A long
Jim van Wel wrote:
Zhe zombies are coming But we are all aware of this fact after release
of the patch ;)
Greetings,
Jim.
I know; but there is always somebody who always says, It won't happen
to me. And sadly they usually never learn their lesson even if
repeated multiple times.
I
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
James Kosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
client 143.215.143.11 query (cache) 'com/ANY/IN' denied: 30 Time(s)
client 143.215.143.11 query (cache) 'gmail.com/ANY/IN' denied: 32
Time(s)
client 143.215.143.11 query (cache) 'hotmail.com/ANY/IN' denied: 31
Thanks
John Smith wrote:
I have a Fedora Core 2 box that is running BIND 9.2.3-13 and I want to
update to the latest patch due to the DNS issue. How can I upgrade my
RPM install? Is there an RPM that is independent of the Fedora OS?
Or is it possible to compile and use the patch installed from
much in advance!
Mike
Good Luck Mike,
James Kosin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate
rfjones wrote:
I update my server to f9; client is f8
my ftp no longer works; I get following error trying to put get or ls:
227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,253,12,152,205).
ftp: connect: Connection timed out
an f9 client can connect without errors
I have not changed the f8 ftp client
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 22:57 +0930, Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 07:59 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
stop copying the whole digest in your posts
If it's technical possible for *this* list server to automatically
reject quoted digest replies, I'd like to see
Everyone,
Maybe as a compromise, Mozilla (Firefox) could tie the pop-up to the
first use of the security feature and not to the start of the application.
This way distributions that didn't want the pop-up could disable the
features in the default configuration before firefox starts. And when
the
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I tried installing F-10 from the hard disk
on my Thinkpad T43
but came up against two major impediments:
1. The cursor is not visible.
Occasionally something lights up, to show where the cursor is
(eg when specifying one's location),
but on other occasions it does
Timothy Murphy wrote:
James Kosin wrote:
I tried installing F-10 from the hard disk
on my Thinkpad T43
but came up against two major impediments:
1. The cursor is not visible.
Occasionally something lights up, to show where the cursor is
(eg when specifying one's location),
but on other
, or uninstalling all the dependent packages then rebuilding.
Am I making sense...
James Kosin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Todd Zullinger wrote:
James Kosin wrote:
When you build a new package (say for postgresql) and you are
leaping version number, say from 7.x to 8.x, How do you go about
updating the other dependencies (other packages that require a
library in 7.x) that doesn't exist in the new package
Christopher A. Williams wrote:
I recently bought a snazzy new 16GB USB pen drive from the local store -
it was only $29! I have several drives that are 8GB and smaller from the
same store that are the same brand.
Imagine my surprise when:
* The 16GB drive is not accessible on either F9 or
adrian kok wrote:
Hi
I have script to remove files but it can't work in
directory
ls *log | sort -r | sed -e 1,1d | xargs rm -f
those folders are:
Nov28-log
Nov29-log
Nov30-log
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
You have to change the
Carlos Carrero Gutierrez wrote:
Hi, i would like to freeze my linux in order to freeze the OS, then,
when I reboot the computer all changes that i made in the computer
dissapears and it returns to the previous OS freezed.
In windows there is something similar, called Deep Freeze (it's
Wade Hampton wrote:
I upgraded a laptop from F8 to F9 and now have an issue
If I log in as a normal use, open an xterm, then type su,
I used to be able to run /sbin/service network restart
Now it fails:
# /sbin/service network restart
env: /etc/init.d/network: Permission denied
Morris.Marshael wrote:
This box does not have a video card and its monitor is a dump terminal
connected through a hmc.
Can I configure X11 server to run so that my PC can access with exceed?
I have already run the yum update since the install to get the latest
and greatest.
Thanks
homb...@tips-q.com wrote:
What is the Fedora way of dealing with this situation?
Once you modify a package your warranty is null and void ;-)
Actually, there is NO WARRANTY of any sort.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
fedora-list mailing list
Rick Stevens wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 11:19 -0400, Jim wrote:
Rick Stevens wrote:
Jim wrote:
Rick Stevens wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 15:27 +, g wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
ttys
'b-'. you did not answer which model and
Jim wrote:
Rick Stevens wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 11:19 -0400, Jim wrote:
Rick Stevens wrote:
Jim wrote:
Rick Stevens wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 15:27 +, g wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
ttys
'b-'. you did not answer
psmith wrote:
James Kosin wrote:
Rick Stevens wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 11:19 -0400, Jim wrote:
Rick Stevens wrote:
Jim wrote:
Rick Stevens wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-08
Tim wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 21:55 +0100, psmith wrote:
the first ever program being
10 print phil is cool
20 goto 10
run
Blasphemer! Stone him, stone him, he used a GOTO! That word is
forbidden and must never be uttered... ;-)
Actually, GOTO was very heavily in BASIC
Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:07:00AM -0400, James Kosin wrote:
Actually, GOTO was very heavily in BASIC programming language. There
was no idea of statement blocks back then.
It may be the only language at the time where it isn't considered taboo.
That's been a bone
Steven W. Orr wrote:
When I tried to update clamav using yum, it told me that I'm up to date.
I've got 0.94.2 and .95 is out. Should I expect this to be available
soon or how would this work?
Questions:
a) What version of fedora? 8, 9, 10?
b) 0.95 made significant changes to milter. This
Steven W. Orr wrote:
On Monday, Apr 13th 2009 at 15:34 -, quoth James Kosin:
=Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:34:01
=From: James Kosin jko...@beta.intcomgrp.com
=Reply-To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora.
=fedora-list@redhat.com
=To: Community
Kevin Kofler wrote:
James Kosin wrote:
b) 0.95 made significant changes to milter. This may be the cause for
the delay. And there is no real threat for using 0.94.2 other than not
being the latest release.
Judging from previous history, the clamav maintainer is extremely cautious
about
Globe Trotter wrote:
Hi,
I am ordering a souped-up workstation and I was wondering which graphics card
is preferable for running fedora:
a 256 MB PCIe x16 nVidia NVS 290, Dual Monitor capable
or
a
ATI Fire GL V3600 256MB, Dual Monitor DVI Capable ATI3600
Tim wrote:
Tim:
But do you know what the drive does when you use that function? ;-\
Bruno Wolff III:
Reading the drive back in should give you a good idea. If that isn't enough
of a check for you then you should just be destroying the drive.
While that would tell you that *you*
Alan Evans wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
All PIIIs are single cores, AFAIK.
Of course I knew that. In my mind, dual and dual core are the same
thing and don't necessarily mean that the cores are on the same die.
Kind of like when I say a Sun E1 is
75 matches
Mail list logo
