On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:44:42 +
n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
Recently I've found Yumex to be unreliable, getting stuck when trying to
do updates. Yet the updates can be made using yum from the command line.
Also it seems to take far too long to update the status of RPMs
installed and
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 07:03:07AM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:44:42 +
n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
Recently I've found Yumex to be unreliable, getting stuck when trying to
do updates. Yet the updates can be made using yum from the command line.
Also it seems to
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 04:16:11PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
the guts of package management. However, PackageKit is neither
unreliable nor barely communicating in my experience, and I use it
most of the time in Fedora. Yum also has bits that allow it to
communicate with PackageKit when run
the guts of package management. However, PackageKit is neither
unreliable nor barely communicating in my experience, and I use it
most of the time in Fedora. Yum also has bits that allow it to
communicate with PackageKit when run on the command line. This system
works quite well.
This one
On 01/07/2010 04:08 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
The yum command line tool is great for anyone who wants to see more of
the guts of package management. However, PackageKit is neither
unreliable nor barely communicating in my experience, and I use it
most of the time in Fedora.
Well, ...
* ...
