On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 18:21 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
FC4 works fine (that's what I'm still using here at CCRMA). It has
realtime kernels, patched pam, etc, etc.
I would rather have things built in Extras for FC4 as well.
Good enough for me. I'll request FC4 branches for my
On Sun, 2006-09-10 at 07:42 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
libfreebob was submitted to FE. It's a userland driver library for many
firewire audio devices:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205929
Good news... jwilson updated libavc1394 in rawhide, so the right version
On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 13:46 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
On Sun, 2006-09-10 at 07:42 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
libfreebob was submitted to FE. It's a userland driver library for many
firewire audio devices:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205929
Good news
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 15:09 -0600, Callum Lerwick wrote:
Has jack's README.Fedora been changed to recommend a memlock of 131072
(128mb) or so? 5 is really not enough.
No, I don't think so. File a bug I guess.
Not sure how we can do out-of-the-box setup that will be acceptable
Per Thomas Jahr wrote:
Hi,
Now that Ardour 2.0 has been released, will it be in the repository for
FC7?
Yes, I just started working on this for F7.
BTW: is there a list of available packages in FC7 somewhere?
Just poke around here...
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
If we keep the ardour package name in Extras and transition that
package to 2.x, how can Planet CCRMA be compatible with that? I can't do
anything on my side, I think (the ardour2 packages have been out there
for a while and are installed in machines all over the
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 23:32 -0800, Anthony Green wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
I think it would be best to put the real ardour binary under
/usr/libexec and put a bash script called ardour under /usr/bin, this
script could then check for an ~/.ardour2
Hi Hector,
Hector Centeno wrote:
I support the idea of having newer versions of pakages in the CCRMA
repos that supersede the ones in the Fedora repos and also agree that
Fernando should get as many volunteers as possible to help him with
the packaging (myself I've been trying to make time for
Harald -
I just read your blog entry here:
http://www.harald-hoyer.de/linux/pulseaudio-and-jackd
I didn't do any of those pulseaudio bits to get jackd running on my F9
system. I just added the jackuser bits to limits.conf and fired up
jackd via qjackctl. What's the benefit of all those
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Audacity 1.3.6-beta comes with support for a few more optional libraries.
One of them is not included in the Fedora Package Collection yet (and
not waiting in the package review queue either):
SLV2 - http://drobilla.net/software/slv2/
SLV2 is a library to make
10 matches
Mail list logo