It seems I've been a bit thick. It's been pretty obvious recently that
Xen isn't flavour of the month around here, but I assumed there were
good reasons for that. Now, rather belatedly, I've found
http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2008/qumranet.html
In short, RedHat paid $107 million
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:15:00AM +, Evan Lavelle wrote:
It seems I've been a bit thick. It's been pretty obvious recently that
Xen isn't flavour of the month around here, but I assumed there were
good reasons for that. Now, rather belatedly, I've found
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:15:00AM +, Evan Lavelle wrote:
It seems I've been a bit thick. It's been pretty obvious recently that
Xen isn't flavour of the month around here, but I assumed there were
good reasons for that. Now, rather belatedly, I've found
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:04:34PM +0200, Neil Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:51:07AM +0100, Jan ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:44:35AM +0200, Neil Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:15:00AM +, Evan Lavelle wrote:
RHEL (and CentOS) 5.3 has support
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Jan ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:44:35AM +0200, Neil Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:15:00AM +, Evan Lavelle wrote:
RHEL (and CentOS) 5.3 has support for Fedora 10 (and above) domUs, and Fedora 11
should have, as well.
Just there is at
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 09:20:48AM +0100, Jan ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
KVM is still not a replacement for paravirtualized machines and I think
fully virtualized KVM will be slower like a paravirtualized XEN.
KVM is a great replacement for Xen. It's much easier to use for a
start -- no more
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Evan Lavelle
sa212+fc...@cyconix.comsa212%2bfc...@cyconix.com
wrote:
Veli-Pekka Kestilä wrote:
Also I don't think kvm will be that different or hard to learn if it
becomes to that. It actually has paravirtual network drivers for windows
from Qumranet which
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:40:55PM +0200, Veli-Pekka Kestilä wrote:
I would really recommend you to change the Dom0 to be CentOS 5.2 or
newer, Fedora 8 has been Dead about ½-month allready and will not get
It's not easy to convert my Dom0 to CentOS, but may be it will be only one
whing
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:50:39AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 09:20:48AM +0100, Jan ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
KVM is still not a replacement for paravirtualized machines and I think
fully virtualized KVM will be slower like a paravirtualized XEN.
KVM is a great
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:47:55AM +, M A Young wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Jan ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:44:35AM +0200, Neil Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:15:00AM +, Evan Lavelle wrote:
RHEL (and CentOS) 5.3 has support for Fedora 10 (and above)
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:40:55PM +0200, Veli-Pekka Kestilä wrote:
Also I don't think kvm will be that different or hard to learn if it
becomes to that. It actually has paravirtual network drivers for windows
from Qumranet which you can get without extra fee so I
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:12:52PM +0100, Jan ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:50:39AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 09:20:48AM +0100, Jan ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
KVM is still not a replacement for paravirtualized machines and I think
fully virtualized
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:19:31PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:12:52PM +0100, Jan ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
You have to tell the host to give the guest a virtio network card -
change the NIC model type='virtio'/ as described here:
Many thanks. Works well.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:28:36PM +0100, Jan ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
virtio_net works well, but I have trouble to boot from virtio_blk.
I can add second disk as virto block device, but I can't boot from first
disk. When using sedond disk, everything works well. When booting via grub,
this is on
(This is all getting offtopic for fedora-xen, we should really move to
fedora-virt)
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 14:28 +0100, Jan ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
virtio_net works well, but I have trouble to boot from virtio_blk.
I can add second disk as virto block device, but I can't boot from
first disk.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:45:52PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:28:36PM +0100, Jan ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
virtio_net works well, but I have trouble to boot from virtio_blk.
I can add second disk as virto block device, but I can't boot from first
disk. When
I think it will not be in 2.6.29. Although
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps says thatit's planned for
2.6.29, I can't see any progres in 2.6.29-rc2 changelog:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/ChangeLog-2.6.29-rc2
Hi,
Just tell it to include virtio_blk module explicitly eg
mkinitrd --with=virtio_blk .other option...
virtio_pci too (which is probably the issue in this case, as the
reporter sayed virtio_blk is included already).
cheers,
Gerd
--
Fedora-xen mailing list
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
(This is all getting offtopic for fedora-xen, we should really move to
fedora-virt)
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 14:28 +0100, Jan ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
virtio_net works well, but I have trouble to boot from virtio_blk.
I
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:06:43PM +0100, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
(This is all getting offtopic for fedora-xen, we should really move to
fedora-virt)
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 14:28 +0100, Jan ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.comwrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:06:43PM +0100, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
wrote:
(This is all getting offtopic for fedora-xen, we should really move to
Hello,
rjo...@redhat.com wrotes about migration :
Install a recent Linux kernel in the guest, adjust the configuration
file[1], and reboot. You only need Xenner if you want to run the Xen
PV guest unchanged (ie. without installing a new guest kernel).
Rich.
[1] 'virsh edit domname', and
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 16:22 +0100, jean-Noël Chardron wrote:
jean-Noël Chardron a écrit :
Hello,
rjo...@redhat.com wrotes about migration :
Install a recent Linux kernel in the guest, adjust the configuration
file[1], and reboot. You only need Xenner if you want to run the Xen
PV
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:20:19PM +0200, Veli-Pekka Kestilä wrote:
So all in all I think for me this aquisition is good news. I think most
problems with xen comes from xensource as it's they only product
generating income and for that reason the opensource version seems to
get less care
Jos Vos writes (Re: [Fedora-xen] Goodbye Xen on RH/Fedora?):
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:53:19PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
I think Xensource is putting a lot of effort into opensource Xen.
I've heard totally different stories from others. For almost every
problem you report, they'll
I tried the Qumranet drivers before I went with Xen. I don't think
there is necessarily a problem with the Qumranet drivers, in fact, they
could potentially have better inbound speeds than the GPLPV ones (though it
seems unlikely as much as people test and James works on them on the
Also, while I'm on the topic, PCI-passthrough was a factor in my
decision as well. Unfortunately, I'm stuck on F8 as well, because I can't
get networking to work on CentOS Xen with my hardware. However, I
understand what is going on, so I'm just holding my breath.
Dustin
Dustin Henning wrote:
I tried the Qumranet drivers before I went with Xen. I don't think
there is necessarily a problem with the Qumranet drivers, in fact, they
could potentially have better inbound speeds than the GPLPV ones (though it
seems unlikely as much as people test and James
It is probably worth noting that if someone were to run a kernel
update with a package manager after getting this working (using information
from later posts in this thread), they would need to do a manual mkinitrd.
At least that was my experience some time ago when switching from hda to
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:40:38PM -0500, Dustin Henning wrote:
Also, while I'm on the topic, PCI-passthrough was a factor in my
decision as well. Unfortunately, I'm stuck on F8 as well, because I can't
get networking to work on CentOS Xen with my hardware. However, I
understand what
Wow, maybe the F8 documentation doesn't cover that, or maybe I'm remembering
wrong, but good to know for future testing. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Kivity [mailto:a...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 13:43
To: dustin.henn...@prd-inc.com
Cc: 'Evan Lavelle';
31 matches
Mail list logo
