On 12-Aug-2002, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be equally happy (perhaps happier) if the header file spec was
removed altogether. In a sense, this would leave the
Haskell part of a
foreign binding even more portable, because it doesn't have
to specify
the names of
System.Mem.performGC does a major GC. When would a partial GC be
enough?
I've described the image-processing example a bunch of times.
We have an external resource (e.g., memory used to store images) which
is somewhat abundant and cheap but not completely free (e.g.,
eventually you
At the moment, there are two kinds of initialisation done for each
module:
Both ELF and DLLs on Windows provide a way of specifying initializers.
Or, easier yet, since the user is already using the hs_init function,
you could use that. The way you'd do that in ELF is to define a
special
At the moment, there are two kinds of initialisation done for each
module:
Both ELF and DLLs on Windows provide a way of specifying initializers.
Or, easier yet, since the user is already using the hs_init function,
you could use that. The way you'd do that in ELF is to define a
