On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:00 PM Derek Buitenhuis
wrote:
> On 07/04/2021 19:56, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> > My OS doesn't even let me install Quicktime 7, if anybody could chime in
> > and help solve this point it would be much appreciated.
> > Alternatively, I'd say we shouldn't cargo cult
On 07/04/2021 19:56, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> My OS doesn't even let me install Quicktime 7, if anybody could chime in
> and help solve this point it would be much appreciated.
> Alternatively, I'd say we shouldn't cargo cult broken files generated by 11
> year old software, but if people
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 12:48 AM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Am Di., 6. Apr. 2021 um 21:51 Uhr schrieb Vittorio Giovara
> :
> >
> > without my patch the sample is shown at a 16:9
> > AR (which I assume was the original fix), with my patch the sample uses
> an
> > AR of 1:1 and it is therefore
Am Di., 6. Apr. 2021 um 21:51 Uhr schrieb Vittorio Giovara
:
>
> without my patch the sample is shown at a 16:9
> AR (which I assume was the original fix), with my patch the sample uses an
> AR of 1:1 and it is therefore square.
> However I tried with a recent
> Quicktime, and it displays the
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 6:51 PM Vittorio Giovara
wrote:
> Here is the proposed patch to address samples like trac/7277.
>
> This effectively reverts an 11 year old patch
> (9044dd83991491309ecb76c389502e410897d7d2) but I wasn't able to identify
> the file mentioned in the log.
>
> If anyone knows
Here is the proposed patch to address samples like trac/7277.
This effectively reverts an 11 year old patch
(9044dd83991491309ecb76c389502e410897d7d2) but I wasn't able to identify
the file mentioned in the log.
If anyone knows where to look up the sample in issue 1539 that is not on
trac I can
