Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/9] Refactor DNN

2024-04-30 Thread Guo, Yejun
> -Original Message- > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Chen, > Wenbin > Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 10:55 AM > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/9] Refactor DNN > > > > On A

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/9] Refactor DNN

2024-04-29 Thread Chen, Wenbin
> -Original Message- > >>>> From: ffmpeg-devel >>>> <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org>> On Behalf Of Zhao Zhili > >>>> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2024 12:42 AM > >>>> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org <mailto:ffmpeg-deve

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/9] Refactor DNN

2024-04-29 Thread Zhao Zhili
; <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org>> On Behalf Of Zhao Zhili >>>> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2024 12:42 AM >>>> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org <mailto:ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> >>>> Cc: Zhao Zhili mailto:zhiliz...@tencent.com>> >>>>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/9] Refactor DNN

2024-04-29 Thread Guo, Yejun
> -Original Message- > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Zhao > Zhili > Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2024 6:55 PM > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/9] Refactor DNN > > > > > O

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/9] Refactor DNN

2024-04-28 Thread Chen, Wenbin
> > On Apr 28, 2024, at 18:58, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > > Extremely low quality filters, both in source code quality and > > performance/security and output quality should be queued for removal. These filters cannot be removed because there are users using them. What are your suggestions to

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/9] Refactor DNN

2024-04-28 Thread Zhao Zhili
> On Apr 28, 2024, at 18:58, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > Extremely low quality filters, both in source code quality and > performance/security and output quality should be queued for removal. I don’t think there is any replacement for the function provided by dnn_detect, which is very important

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/9] Refactor DNN

2024-04-28 Thread Paul B Mahol
Extremely low quality filters, both in source code quality and performance/security and output quality should be queued for removal. ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/9] Refactor DNN

2024-04-28 Thread Zhao Zhili
eg.org <mailto:ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> >> Cc: Zhao Zhili mailto:zhiliz...@tencent.com>> >> Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/9] Refactor DNN >> >> From: Zhao Zhili >> >> During the refactor progress, I have found some serious issues, which is not

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/9] Refactor DNN

2024-04-28 Thread Guo, Yejun
> -Original Message- > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Zhao > Zhili > Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2024 12:42 AM > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > Cc: Zhao Zhili > Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/9] Refactor DNN > > From: Zhao Zhili > > During the ref

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH WIP 0/9] Refactor DNN

2024-04-27 Thread Zhao Zhili
From: Zhao Zhili During the refactor progress, I have found some serious issues, which is not resolved by the patchset: 1. Tensorflow backend is broken. I think it doesn't work since 2021 at least. For example, it destroy a thread and create a new thread for each frame, and it destroy an