Jan Ekström (12020-04-11):
> I think this all depends on how much of a use there is for this sort of thing.
>
> Just looking at the case of wanting to output data from a filter, I
> would default to the opinion that it would make sense to have these
> writers (or at least some of them) common to
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 5:27 PM Nicolas George wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> In the comments on a recent patch to implement statistics outputs for a
> specific filter, I noted that this is something that many filters need
> to do, and therefore in need of unification. I also observed some JSON
> code
On 4/10/20, Nicolas George wrote:
> Hi.
>
> In the comments on a recent patch to implement statistics outputs for a
> specific filter, I noted that this is something that many filters need
> to do, and therefore in need of unification. I also observed some JSON
> code in a filter, which does not
Hi.
In the comments on a recent patch to implement statistics outputs for a
specific filter, I noted that this is something that many filters need
to do, and therefore in need of unification. I also observed some JSON
code in a filter, which does not belong there.
