Peter B. wrote:
Hello,
I hope this is the right list, since FFmpeg's JPEG 2000 support is
always mentioned as Summer-of-Code project.
I am currently evaluating the usage of free (as in free speech, not free
beer) software tools (e.g. FFmpeg) for a national, long term video
archive
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:22:26PM +0100, Peter B. wrote:
Hello,
I hope this is the right list, since FFmpeg's JPEG 2000 support is
always mentioned as Summer-of-Code project.
I am currently evaluating the usage of free (as in free speech, not free
beer) software tools (e.g. FFmpeg) for a
Thanks for the tip!
I must admit that I haven't focused on JPEG-LS, because according to
information about it I've found on the web, it seemed that JPEG-LS is
less known/supported/used than JPEG 2000.
Theoretically it seems a valuable alternative to JPEG 2000 by offering
faster processing and
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 05:09:47PM +0100, Peter B. wrote:
Thanks for the tip!
I must admit that I haven't focused on JPEG-LS, because according to
information about it I've found on the web, it seemed that JPEG-LS is
less known/supported/used than JPEG 2000.
well ffmpeg supports jpeg-ls
Wow! Thank you very much for that detailed insight description.
From what I've researched today on the web, JPEG-LS would be great for
our archive project: It's faster, smaller and still an open standard.
If it's so easy to add support for it, we could think about funding
JPEG-LS integration
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:31:55PM +0100, Peter B. wrote:
Wow! Thank you very much for that detailed insight description.
From what I've researched today on the web, JPEG-LS would be great for
our archive project: It's faster, smaller and still an open standard.
If it's so easy to add
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 03:52:37AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:31:55PM +0100, Peter B. wrote:
Wow! Thank you very much for that detailed insight description.
From what I've researched today on the web, JPEG-LS would be great for
our archive project: It's
