[FFmpeg-soc] [soc]: r5533 - in indeo5: TODO description

Author: diego Date: Sun Dec 13 12:21:05 2009 New Revision: 5533 Log: cosmetics: Break overly long lines. Modified: indeo5/TODO indeo5/description Modified: indeo5/TODO == --- indeo5/TODO Sun Dec 13 05:24:02 2009

[FFmpeg-soc] [soc]: r5534 - in indeo5: indeo5.c ivi_common.c ivi_common.h

Author: diego Date: Sun Dec 13 12:21:59 2009 New Revision: 5534 Log: cosmetics: Break overly long lines. Modified: indeo5/indeo5.c indeo5/ivi_common.c indeo5/ivi_common.h Modified: indeo5/indeo5.c == ---

[FFmpeg-soc] Support for JPEG 2000 image files

Hello, I hope this is the right list, since FFmpeg's JPEG 2000 support is always mentioned as Summer-of-Code project. I am currently evaluating the usage of free (as in free speech, not free beer) software tools (e.g. FFmpeg) for a national, long term video archive project. The plan is to store

[FFmpeg-soc] [soc]: r5535 - in indeo5: indeo5.c ivi_common.c

Author: diego Date: Sun Dec 13 12:24:32 2009 New Revision: 5535 Log: KR cosmetics: Indent case statements at the same depth as switch. Modified: indeo5/indeo5.c indeo5/ivi_common.c Modified: indeo5/indeo5.c == ---

Re: [FFmpeg-soc] Support for JPEG 2000 image files

Peter B. wrote: Hello, I hope this is the right list, since FFmpeg's JPEG 2000 support is always mentioned as Summer-of-Code project. I am currently evaluating the usage of free (as in free speech, not free beer) software tools (e.g. FFmpeg) for a national, long term video archive

Re: [FFmpeg-soc] Support for JPEG 2000 image files

On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:22:26PM +0100, Peter B. wrote: Hello, I hope this is the right list, since FFmpeg's JPEG 2000 support is always mentioned as Summer-of-Code project. I am currently evaluating the usage of free (as in free speech, not free beer) software tools (e.g. FFmpeg) for a

Re: [FFmpeg-soc] Support for JPEG 2000 image files

Thanks for the tip! I must admit that I haven't focused on JPEG-LS, because according to information about it I've found on the web, it seemed that JPEG-LS is less known/supported/used than JPEG 2000. Theoretically it seems a valuable alternative to JPEG 2000 by offering faster processing and

Re: [FFmpeg-soc] Support for JPEG 2000 image files

On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 05:09:47PM +0100, Peter B. wrote: Thanks for the tip! I must admit that I haven't focused on JPEG-LS, because according to information about it I've found on the web, it seemed that JPEG-LS is less known/supported/used than JPEG 2000. well ffmpeg supports jpeg-ls

Re: [FFmpeg-soc] Support for JPEG 2000 image files

Wow! Thank you very much for that detailed insight description. From what I've researched today on the web, JPEG-LS would be great for our archive project: It's faster, smaller and still an open standard. If it's so easy to add support for it, we could think about funding JPEG-LS integration

Re: [FFmpeg-soc] Support for JPEG 2000 image files

On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:31:55PM +0100, Peter B. wrote: Wow! Thank you very much for that detailed insight description. From what I've researched today on the web, JPEG-LS would be great for our archive project: It's faster, smaller and still an open standard. If it's so easy to add

Re: [FFmpeg-soc] Support for JPEG 2000 image files

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 03:52:37AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:31:55PM +0100, Peter B. wrote: Wow! Thank you very much for that detailed insight description. From what I've researched today on the web, JPEG-LS would be great for our archive project: It's

[FFmpeg-soc] [soc]: r5536 - aac-sbr/aacsbr.c

Author: alexc Date: Mon Dec 14 07:22:01 2009 New Revision: 5536 Log: Fix the computation of the limiter table. Use a floating point divide when calculating nOctaves. Modified: aac-sbr/aacsbr.c Modified: aac-sbr/aacsbr.c