I'm sure this has been discussed on the list before, but can someone refresh
my memory, will Finale 2002 run w/MIDI keyboards, OMS on Mac in classic
environment? I'm contemplating a move to Mac G5 and want to know how much
I'm going to have to spend on software upgrades and peripherals. Thanks,
I could never get 2002 to work well under Classic. 2003a works ok in
Classic. I'd wait another 3 weeks and get the OS X version of
Finale.
Bonnie Harris wrote:
I'm sure this has been discussed on the list before, but can someone refresh
my memory, will Finale 2002 run w/MIDI keyboards,
Hola, Matthew
How about the speed? I installed the Sibelius 2 demo and it was very slow in
my G4. It was like working in slow motion with a time delay added.
[My G4 is by no means the fastest, but enough to run ProTools LE and Logic
Audio withourt problems.]
Anyway a program that does not
I'm sure this has been discussed on the list before, but can someone
refresh
my memory, will Finale 2002 run w/MIDI keyboards, OMS on Mac in classic
environment? I'm contemplating a move to Mac G5 and want to know how much
I'm going to have to spend on software upgrades and peripherals. Thanks,
David:
You may have assigned an expression which has playback capability set to
Tempo and a very low number. Or you may have duplicated and edited an
expression, not realizing what you duplicated already had playback
assigned.
Me:
That was it. Duplicated and edited, indeed! Thanks.
ng
Javier Ruiz wrote:
Hola, Matthew
How about the speed? I installed the Sibelius 2 demo and it was very slow
in
my G4. It was like working in slow motion with a time delay added.
[My G4 is by no means the fastest, but enough to run ProTools LE and
Logic
Audio withourt problems.]
Well, I
At 01:00 PM 9/26/2003 +1000, Matthew Hindson Fastmail Acct wrote:
There is still no scroll view. You realise how good it is to be able to
enter notes without page layout constantly taking place when, for example,
the bar you're working on suddenly jumps off the screen because it's been
pushed to
From: Craig Parmerlee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is like some tortured game of whack-a-mole.
Great imagery!!
--RH
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
However, Sibelius now has a feature called focus on staves which works
somewhat like staff sets in Finale. This makes it much easier to enter notes
without all the jumping around. There is a work-around in Sibelius where you
can set the page width to a large number and get sort of an ersatz scroll
I sometimes have the impression that the Custom Line tool may be one of the most
underused really powerful things in Finale. In an offline conversation with a Coda
person, I complained that a major drawback of the CLT is that text (i.e., Left, Center
Full, or Right) that is visible in a score
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Bathory-Kitsz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the Graphire days, it was possible to emulate scroll mode by making the
page temporarily hundreds of inches wide. Not possible in Sibelius?
Dennis,
At 07:29 PM 9/26/03 -0500, Williams, Jim wrote:
you're writing as if Graphire has expired..has it?
No, it's been re-worked. There was an announcement recently that Barbara
Touburg forwarded me from the Score discussion list:
===
I think it would be a good idea for me to put my two cents in at
At 8:12 PM 09/22/03, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
For those that don't remember, Turandot is a brand new notation program [...]
Oh rats. When I read the subject line I thought maybe the 1998 copyright
extension had been overturned. The opera Turandot was supposed to go into
public domain in the United
Robert Patterson Finale wrote:
I sometimes have the impression that the Custom Line tool may be one of the most underused really powerful things in Finale. In an offline conversation with a Coda person, I complained that a major drawback of the CLT is that text (i.e., Left, Center Full, or Right)
14 matches
Mail list logo
