Peter Castine wrote:
On around Sat, 13 Jul 2002 08:14:44 -0700, Philip Aker--suspecting
self-contradiction on my part?--said something like:
Actually, due to the contents of a number of your posts, I been
thinking that you don't have OS X 10.1.5 installed on a machine
you use on a daily
David:
You've missed my point about Finale's upgrade schedule entirely.
The point is that a Carbonized application runs on MacOS from
8.6 to X.x. Coda did not implement the incremental changes over
the last four years that would have made the final step from a
Classic application to a
And so it came to pass that Johannes Gebauer spake:
Even OS X, the biggest OS change
in the last 18 years, still lets a number of non-updated apps run. Shame
about the audio MIDI, though.
That is strictly speaking not correct. Anything that is not Carbon (ie
Classic apps not updated
And so it came to pass that Mark D. Lew spake:
At 2:23 PM 07/11/02, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Unfortunately, since the only PDF files I ever need to make are Finale
files, and Finale is not yet compatible with OS X, I've never had the
opportunity to really test this feature. This is just one
Jarii Williamsson spoke:
What if MaxOSX (or Carbon) _didn't_ work in real-life implementations or
_didn't_ get customer approval? This has happened many times before in
history, and the former is still true for MacOSX to some extent regarding
the MIDI implementation - one and a half year after
On around 1472002 12:54, Philip Aker said something like:
I wonder what your top 10 peeves with OS X are?
Unix, unix, unix, unix, unix, unix, unix, unix, unix, and 192x192 pixel
icons.
A more when I get back. I'm out of town for five days and still have some
preparation to do.
-- P.
On 14 Jul 2002, at 3:54, Philip Aker wrote:
You've missed my point about Finale's upgrade schedule entirely.
The point is that a Carbonized application runs on MacOS from
8.6 to X.x. Coda did not implement the incremental changes over
the last four years that would have made the final
On Friday, July 12, 2002, at 02:52 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
If you read my reply to Jari Williamsson on the same topic,
you will see that had Coda been implementing the changes for
Carbon incrementally, the adaption to MacOS X would be
comparable to a minor upgrade. That is because
Peter Castine wrote:
In one post:
I can't remember whether it was Tog or one of the later Apple
UI gurus who adivsed that developers responsible for porting
software should spend at least half a year using the other
platform as their main working machine. To learn the culture,
to learn
I've been using Finale since version 1.0 - when it was Mac only - one
of the main reasons I went Mac. For that matter, Quicken when it was
Apple II and Mac (no PC), AOL when it was only a Mac community,
PageMaker when it was Mac or nothing. All these great programs (okay, maybe
not AOL) that
Philip Aker wrote:
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 04:48 PM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
I hope Coda has finally decided to stop discriminating against it's
long time Macintosh user base in this regard.
We Windows users had to slog through *four* versions of Finale to get
one that
On 11 Jul 2002, at 20:56, Philip Aker wrote:
FinWin 2003 is compatible with WindowsXP but FinMac 2003 will
not be with MacOS X. Yet MacOS X was released well before
copycat XP.
A ridiculous comparison, to say the least.
WinXP is not a new API, nor a completely new OS architecture. It is a
On Friday, July 12, 2002, at 04:37 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
The point is that just like everyone else, Coda has known
since late 1996 that changes were coming and since late 1997,
opportunity to stage in a Carbon port.
What if MaxOSX (or Carbon) _didn't_ work in real-life
On Friday, July 12, 2002, at 06:15 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
FinWin 2003 is compatible with WindowsXP but FinMac 2003 will
not be with MacOS X. Yet MacOS X was released well before
copycat XP.
A ridiculous comparison, to say the least.
Right now, I think the ridiculousness is coming
Date: 12 Jul 2002 02:03:30 -0500
From: Harold Steinhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dennis, if it's comforting to you, I feel recent versions of Finale
for Mac have become a Windoze-port stepchild.
Amen.
Basically, a company that understands the fact that the Mac UI is more
than the Windows UI with an
On 12.07.2002 17:36 Uhr, Peter Castine wrote
Even OS X, the biggest OS change
in the last 18 years, still lets a number of non-updated apps run. Shame
about the audio MIDI, though.
That is strictly speaking not correct. Anything that is not Carbon (ie
Classic apps not updated for OS X) will
You can basically do the same thing with OS 8/9. Print to File, and in
the Save as File panel select Acrobat PDF.
We're talking here about making a PDF without the help of an Adobe product
directly from the OS. Aren't we? Of course it is possible with the help of
ghostscript or distiller but
On 12 Jul 2002, at 17:36, Peter Castine wrote:
Apple's track record on backwards compatibility is actually, IMHO, pretty
good. I've still got a couple of dozen little apps that are more than 10
years old and run on my current set up. Even OS X, the biggest OS change
in the last 18 years,
On 12 Jul 2002, at 7:16, Philip Aker wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2002, at 06:15 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
WinXP is not a new API, nor a completely new OS architecture.
It is a minor upgrade to Windows 2000, a significant upgrade to
NT 4.
If you read my reply to Jari Williamsson on
From the Apple web site:
Being able to create PDF files is really handy, and Mac OS X lets you create
them from any application.
Here¹s how:
Open a document you¹d like to save as a PDF, pull down the File
menu, and choose Print.
In the Print dialog, click the Preview button. Mac
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 01:46 PM, Doug Auwarter wrote:
Anybody tried this? I'm curious how well it works and what are the
disadvantages to using another dedicated piece of software like Acrobat
or
Ghostwriter to create PDF files.
Unfortunately, since the only PDF files I ever need
From the Apple web site:
Being able to create PDF files is really handy, and Mac OS X lets you create
them from any application.
Here's how:
* Open a document you'd like to save as a PDF, pull down the File
menu, and choose Print.
* In the Print dialog, click the Preview button. Mac
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 11:23 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 01:46 PM, Doug Auwarter wrote:
Anybody tried this? I'm curious how well it works and what are
the disadvantages to using another dedicated piece of software
like Acrobat or Ghostwriter to
At 04:17 PM 7/11/02 -0700, Philip Aker wrote:
I hope Coda has
finally decided to stop discriminating against it's long time
Macintosh user base in this regard.
We Windows users had to slog through *four* versions of Finale to get one
that didn't act like a Mac-port stepchild. Even today,
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 04:48 PM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
I hope Coda has finally decided to stop discriminating against
it's long time Macintosh user base in this regard.
We Windows users had to slog through *four* versions of Finale
to get one that didn't act like a Mac-port
25 matches
Mail list logo
