Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails?

2011-02-11 Thread j. helffrich
, 2011 6:34:47 AM Subject: Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/10/11 2:41 AM, j. helffrich wrote: Hi, Recently, after a selfupdate when I tried to update fink packages I got this: snip dpkg: parse error, in file `/sw/var/lib/dpkg

Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails?

2011-02-10 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/10/11 2:41 AM, j. helffrich wrote: Hi, Recently, after a selfupdate when I tried to update fink packages I got this: snip dpkg: parse error, in file `/sw/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 5260 package `db48-aes': missing version ###

Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails?

2011-02-10 Thread Dr. Madhurjya P. Bora
When the CVS server comes up, what will be my procedure to update-cvs? Regards, --- Madhurjya On Thu Feb 10th, 2011 6:04 PM IST Alexander Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/10/11 2:41 AM, j. helffrich wrote: Hi, Recently, after a selfupdate when I tried to

[Fink-beginners] update-all fails?

2011-02-09 Thread j. helffrich
Hi, Recently, after a selfupdate when I tried to update fink packages I got this: G4Mac:~ jah$ fink update-all Information about 11535 packages read in 2 seconds. W: Encountered status field in a non-version description fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency.

[Fink-beginners] update-all fails with gimp

2008-07-15 Thread Fredrik Lundgren
Hello, When I run fink update-all I have problems with Gimp libtool: link: cannot find the library `/sw/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.la' make[3]: *** [svg] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.34pTc0

Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails with gimp

2008-07-15 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Fredrik Lundgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hello, When I run fink update-all I have problems with Gimp libtool: link: cannot find the library `/sw/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.la' make[3]: *** [svg] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all]

Re: [Fink-beginners] Update-all fails on guile-dev conflict

2007-09-04 Thread Martin Costabel
Thomas Pulhamus wrote: [] fink update-all [] The following 278 packages will be installed or updated: akregator amarok amarok-core amarok-core-shlibs amarok-engine-xine amor ark [etc] On my Fink installation, none of the latest versions of these packages has a dependency on guile-dev, so it

Re: [Fink-beginners] Update-all fails on guile-dev conflict

2007-09-04 Thread Thomas Pulhamus
The output to the command you supplied reads /sw/fink/dists//stable/crypto/finkinfo/gnome-vfs-ssl.info /sw/fink/dists//stable/main/finkinfo/editors/autogen.info /sw/fink/dists//stable/main/finkinfo/gnome/gal19.info /sw/fink/dists//stable/main/finkinfo/gnome/gnome-utils-1.4.1.2-1013.info

Re: [Fink-beginners] Update-all fails on guile-dev conflict

2007-09-04 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Thomas Pulhamus wrote: The output to the command you supplied reads /sw/fink/dists//stable/crypto/finkinfo/gnome-vfs-ssl.info /sw/fink/dists//stable/main/finkinfo/editors/autogen.info /sw/fink/dists//stable/main/finkinfo/gnome/gal19.info

Re: [Fink-beginners] Update-all fails on guile-dev conflict

2007-09-04 Thread Martin Costabel
Thomas Pulhamus wrote: [] Show-deps kdepim3 doesn't show guile on my machine. Yet looking at output from a previous attempt to update kdepim3, I notice it there. The only other thing that seems to require guile in that list is swig. Yes, it seems swig is the guilty party here. It's a little

Re: [Fink-beginners] Update-all fails on guile-dev conflict

2007-09-04 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 9/4/07, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas Pulhamus wrote: [] Show-deps kdepim3 doesn't show guile on my machine. Yet looking at output from a previous attempt to update kdepim3, I notice it there. The only other thing that seems to require guile in that list is swig.

Re: [Fink-beginners] Update-all fails on guile-dev conflict

2007-09-04 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Hansen wrote: [] I thought that at the time I updated swig I updated everything that depended on swig-shlibs.Opensync was updated a month later. I guess swig-shlibs should be tagged as obsolete. Besides opensync, there is also sqlite3-rb that depends on swig and swig-shlibs.

Re: [Fink-beginners] Update-all fails on guile-dev conflict

2007-09-04 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Alexander Hansen wrote: On 9/4/07, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas Pulhamus wrote: [] Show-deps kdepim3 doesn't show guile on my machine. Yet looking at output from a previous attempt to update kdepim3, I notice it there. The only other thing that seems to require

Re: [Fink-beginners] Update-all fails on guile-dev conflict

2007-09-04 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Martin Costabel wrote: Alexander Hansen wrote: [] I thought that at the time I updated swig I updated everything that depended on swig-shlibs.Opensync was updated a month later. I guess swig-shlibs should be tagged as obsolete. Besides opensync, there is also sqlite3-rb that

Re: [Fink-beginners] Update-all fails on guile-dev conflict

2007-09-04 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexander K. Hansen wrote: I _did_ update that. The maintainer undid my changes on a new %v. :-) Yeah, it didn't get fixed in my local tree, so it got overwritten. ;) - -- Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development

Re: [Fink-beginners] Update-all fails on guile-dev conflict

2007-09-03 Thread Thomas Pulhamus
I took your advice and began updating individual kde packages. I managed to get through kdebase3, kdegraphics3, and kdesdk3. However, when I tried to update kdepim3, I received the following message Failed: Fink::SysState: Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies I seemed once again to

Re: [Fink-beginners] Update-all fails on guile-dev conflict

2007-09-03 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Thomas Pulhamus wrote: I took your advice and began updating individual kde packages. I managed to get through kdebase3, kdegraphics3, and kdesdk3. However, when I tried to update kdepim3, I received the following message Failed: Fink::SysState: Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies I

[Fink-beginners] update-all fails (after switch to Intel)

2006-03-16 Thread Andrew Youdin
I see similar problems on the list, but not quite mine.  I get the following buildlock error when I run "fink -y update-all"  This is on my brand new Intel MacBook.  I installed the recent versions of X11 and XCode tools w/OS X 10.4.5  The fink files were transferred from an old G4 PowerBook

Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails (after switch to Intel)

2006-03-16 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 3/15/06, Andrew Youdin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see similar problems on the list, but not quite mine. I get the following buildlock error when I run fink -y update-all This is on my brand new Intel MacBook. I installed the recent versions of X11 and XCode tools w/OS X 10.4.5 The fink

Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails (after switch to Intel)

2006-03-16 Thread Andrew Youdin
Thanks, that worked great. I had to install some extra fonts to get gv to run without errors, but otherwise so far so good! -Andrew On Mar 16, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On 3/15/06, Andrew Youdin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see similar problems on the list, but not quite

Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails...

2006-02-07 Thread SA
I said rsync method, meaning run fink selfupdate-rsync to switch over. Or if you insist on using CVS (which is not recommended unless something in your net connection requires it) you shouldread the FAQ, which has an entry that explains what to do for your problem: Ok this work although

[Fink-beginners] update-all fails...

2006-02-06 Thread SA
Dear List, I have been using fink for a long time now in complete ignorance of what I am doing so far it has just worked. I recently tried update-all after I noticed serious problems with my version of gv. This fails due to a dependency error I do not understand (full script below): fink

Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails...

2006-02-06 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 2/6/06, SA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear List, I have been using fink for a long time now in complete ignorance of what I am doing so far it has just worked. I recently tried update-all after I noticed serious problems with my version of gv. This fails due to a dependency error I do

Fwd: Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails...

2006-02-06 Thread SA
Snip... That's very odd, considering that the same version xml-parser-pm581 seems to be available across the board: http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/xml-parser-pm581 If your Fink installation is way out of date then you probably need to update a lot of stuff. update-all won't

Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails on esound

2005-05-19 Thread Joe Davison
RIght you are! The Header directory for the CoreAudio framework was empty. Pacificist enabled me to put the old ones back (should there be new ones? where would I find them?). After doing that, I retried the fink update-all and it has moved beyond esound installation, but still has a

Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails on esound

2005-05-16 Thread Benjamin Reed
Joe Davison wrote: checking CoreAudio/CoreAudio.h usability... no checking CoreAudio/CoreAudio.h presence... no looks like you're missing the CoreAudio SDK Apple loves to update software, and at the same time, fail to update and/or remove the SDK that went with the old version. You probably just

Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails on esound

2005-05-16 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On May 16, 2005, at 12:54 AM, Joe Davison wrote: I'm running os 10.3.9 on a G4, using the fink stable packages. fink's been up running for several years, last updated Dec 17, '04. Tonight I did a fink selfupdate that succeeded then proceeded to an update-all. Something I've previously installed

Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails on esound

2005-05-16 Thread Joe Davison
That made sense. I went to ADC and downloaded the CoreAudio SDK and installed it, but it didn't change anything -- looks like all that was in that package went into /Developer/Examples. Where should I look for the header files -- I probably have the XCode 1.5 dmg on a cd if that's were to

Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails on esound

2005-05-16 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On May 16, 2005, at 12:27 PM, Joe Davison wrote: That made sense. I went to ADC and downloaded the CoreAudio SDK and installed it, but it didn't change anything -- looks like all that was in that package went into /Developer/Examples. Where should I look for the header files -- I probably

[Fink-beginners] update-all fails on esound

2005-05-15 Thread Joe Davison
I'm running os 10.3.9 on a G4, using the fink stable packages. fink's been up running for several years, last updated Dec 17, '04. Tonight I did a fink selfupdate that succeeded then proceeded to an update-all. Something I've previously installed depends on the gnome libraries which in turn

[Fink-beginners] update-all fails

2004-05-03 Thread Robert
Thought I had this one whipped. selfupdate worked with not hitches. Fink update-all failed with the following message: (Reading database ... 111821 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace locale-gettext-pm581 1.01-1 (using

Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails

2004-05-03 Thread Alexander K . Hansen
If you're on Panther, then perl581-core is a virtual package. 1) You are on Panther, right? 2) If you run fink-virtual-pkgs does perl581-core show up? 3) If not, did you install a new Perl version (e.g. Perl 5.8.3)? On May 3, 2004, at 9:03 PM, Robert wrote: Thought I had this one whipped.

Re: [Fink-beginners] update-all fails

2003-06-18 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 09:07 PM, robert nuzum wrote: When I try to run update-all I get the error: internal error:node for automake already exists. Anyone know what this means? thanks for any help. Bob There is a FAQ on this on the website. -chris zubrzycki - -- PGP public key:

[Fink-beginners] update-all fails

2003-06-17 Thread robert nuzum
When I try to run update-all I get the error: internal error:node for automake already exists. Anyone know what this means? thanks for any help. Bob --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An