Re: [Fink-devel] Patching rsync.info

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Blair Zajac wrote: | Anybody mind if I patch rsync.info with this patch? snip Have you verified that rsync still computes the checksums correctly when using your patch ? If you arer 100% sure, go ahead and check in your patched version. - -d

[Fink-devel] link failure for gimp2: _libintl_* [was: Fwd: gimp2-2.0.0-2]

Alexander Strange wrote: I can't figure out what's happening here. I would suspect a modified libintl (that had a libintl_ prefixed to all its symbols), but since he moved /usr/local out of the way there shouldn't be one. Any news on this? I just ran across a similar error with the

[Fink-devel] Virtual package handling

Okay, I'm getting mighty tired of I can't find system-java14-dev questions, and wondered how we could better handle these virtual packages. Currently, when VirtPackage does not find the requisite files for a given system-foo, the system-foo virtual package does not get created. That means users

[Fink-devel] Re: gconf-editor-2.6.2-7, gconf2-2.6.3-8, gstreamer-0.8.3-8

Daniel Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: gconf-editor and gconf2 install man pages into /sw/man instead of /sw/share/man. Also, gstreamer is missing a BuildDepends on bison. Panther's bison is too old. gstreamer fixed. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks

Re: [Fink-devel] Patching rsync.info

D. Höhn wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Blair Zajac wrote: | Anybody mind if I patch rsync.info with this patch? snip Have you verified that rsync still computes the checksums correctly when using your patch ? If you arer 100% sure, go ahead and check in your patched

Re: [Fink-devel] Patching popt.info

Daniel Johnson wrote: If you also change SetLDFLAGS: -lintl to SetLDFLAGS: -no-undefined -lintl this package will build prebound. Thanks for the tip. My CVS commit contained this change. One question. I looked in the gcc.info and ld.info files for documentation on -no-undefined and couldn't

Re: [Fink-devel] Patching popt.info

Blair Zajac wrote: Daniel Johnson wrote: If you also change SetLDFLAGS: -lintl to SetLDFLAGS: -no-undefined -lintl this package will build prebound. Thanks for the tip. My CVS commit contained this change. One question. I looked in the gcc.info and ld.info files for documentation on

[Fink-devel] Re: Making proj prebound

I added a tracker item (985693) for proj, but I haven't worked with prebinding before. I added some clips from the build that show that for example nad2bin complains about not be prebound. Can anyone say if there is something else that has to be done for prebinding? Thanks, -kurt Hi Kurt,

Re: [Fink-devel] Patching popt.info

On Jul 5, 2004, at 5:30 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: Blair Zajac wrote: Daniel Johnson wrote: If you also change SetLDFLAGS: -lintl to SetLDFLAGS: -no-undefined -lintl this package will build prebound. Thanks for the tip. My CVS commit contained this change. One question. I looked in the gcc.info

Re: [Fink-devel] Patching popt.info

Daniel Johnson wrote: Libraries have to meet several requirements to be prebound: * all dependencies must be prebound * must use two-level namespace * can't have undefined symbols Fink's prebinding support fortunately does all the hard work, maintainers just have to meet the above requirements.