Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 O0g.gch: file changed as we read it (again)

2007-03-01 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 27 Feb 2007, at 18:44, Daniel Johnson wrote: I don't know exactly why it's happening, but I have figured out some things. The file changed as we read it warning does occur sometimes with tar 1.15.1, but it always returned an exit code of 0 in such cases. It would return 1 if a fatal error

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 O0g.gch: file changed as we read it (again)

2007-03-01 Thread Daniel Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 1, 2007, at 10:20 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 27 Feb 2007, at 18:44, Daniel Johnson wrote: I don't know exactly why it's happening, but I have figured out some things. The file changed as we read it warning does occur sometimes

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 O0g.gch: file changed as we read it (again)

2007-03-01 Thread Daniel Macks
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 07:36:08AM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: Jean-Fran?ois Mertens wrote: [] (I would bet rather on the ctime than on the size _ which looks to me as an almost redundant test _, but evidence for that will disappear after your patch .. (sigh) ) I wonder why none of