Could those of you who have or had the dpkg-deb failure caused by
tar-1.16.1 claiming
file changed as we read it
please help with debugging this? Based on the outcome of these tests, we
should be able to decide whether we need to patch tar or dpkg, or
whether we need to dig further down.
I'm in the process of moving for my new job--where they use Windows
machines--and I'm not going to have a home Internet connection for a
week. I'll be available via email, but I'm not going to be able to do
anything significant involving packages.
If any commentary comes in regarding packages
Because mysql takes not so much time to build compared to gcc4, I
tried that one first with the new tar. On my system it build and
installed without an error. Right now I am building gcc4. Once that
is done in a couple of hours, I will let you know how it went.
- Koen.
On Mar 3, 2007, at
On 3/3/07, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could those of you who have or had the dpkg-deb failure caused by
tar-1.16.1 claiming
file changed as we read it
please help with debugging this?
Sure. I have been rebuilding stuff all morning with this version of
tar, and I haven't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 3, 2007, at 3:52 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Could those of you who have or had the dpkg-deb failure caused by
tar-1.16.1 claiming
file changed as we read it
please help with debugging this? Based on the outcome of these
tests, we
Martin,
I'd be curious to see how far those ctimes are from the current
time(). Can you post your patch?
On 3/3/07, Daniel Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 3, 2007, at 3:52 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Could those of you who have or had
Charles Lepple wrote:
Martin,
I'd be curious to see how far those ctimes are from the current
time(). Can you post your patch?
They are just printed out with format %i. To get the real time, you can
run these numbers through /bin/date -r:
% /bin/date -r 1172946146
Sat Mar 3 19:22:26 CET
On 3/3/07, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Lepple wrote:
Martin,
I'd be curious to see how far those ctimes are from the current
time(). Can you post your patch?
They are just printed out with format %i. To get the real time, you can
run these numbers through /bin/date
Charles Lepple wrote:
On 3/3/07, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Lepple wrote:
Martin,
I'd be curious to see how far those ctimes are from the current
time(). Can you post your patch?
They are just printed out with format %i. To get the real time, you can
run these
