Evan Broder wrote:
Hi,
I think I've got a patch that fixes the postflight script on 10.5.
There are two things that I fix: first, ps axww seems to for some reason
list lots of processes on 10.5. I will freely admit that I don't
understand the options to ps on OS X or any other
Martin Costabel wrote:
Good catch. To me this looks like a bug in Leopard's /bin/ps: When the
-a flag is present, it ignores the -p pid flag. I have immediately
filed a bug with Apple's bugreporter.
The environment variables (in particular $HOME and $USER) with which the
installer runs
Martin Costabel wrote:
Good catch. To me this looks like a bug in Leopard's /bin/ps: When the
-a flag is present, it ignores the -p pid flag. I have immediately
filed a bug with Apple's bugreporter.
I imagine that it will be closed as invalid. With -a, you are
essentially asking for all
I am fowarding this to fink-devel because maintainer's email bounces.
Sébastien
Begin forwarded message:
From: Sébastien Maret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: February 4, 2008 16:17:31 CEST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fink autossh package
Hi,
Fink autossh package is a bit outdated. Would you
Sébastien Maret wrote:
I am fowarding this to fink-devel because maintainer's email bounces.
Sébastien
Begin forwarded message:
From: Sébastien Maret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: February 4, 2008 16:17:31 CEST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fink autossh package
Hi,
Fink autossh
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
[]
I imagine that it will be closed as invalid. With -a, you are
essentially asking for all processes with a controlling terminal, with
-p you ask for all processes which match the given process id. ps will
return both all the processes with a controlling terminal and
Begin forwarded message:
From: Murali Vadivelu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 5 February 2008 02:10:23 GMT
To: pguyot AT kallisys.net
Subject: Trying to port your package to Fink
Dear Developer,
I am trying to port you package to Fink, i386-elf-gcc.
I am not sure how t troubleshoot this error:
ed
