[Fink-devel] xemacs compiled with Xft support ?

2008-03-05 Thread DJamé Seddah
Hi list, Does anyone know if it's possible to build xemacs on fink with xft support in order to have some sort of antialiasing ? I grabbed the xemacs source from the fink's directory and according to ./configure --help it has no --with-xft=emacs,menubar option i'm using fink for 10.4

Re: [Fink-devel] xemacs compiled with Xft support ?

2008-03-05 Thread Alexander Hansen
DJamé Seddah wrote: Hi list, Does anyone know if it's possible to build xemacs on fink with xft support in order to have some sort of antialiasing ? I grabbed the xemacs source from the fink's directory and according to ./configure --help it has no --with-xft=emacs,menubar option

[Fink-devel] New packages in tracker

2008-03-05 Thread John Ridgway
Friends - I currently have two new packages and two updates in the tracker: 1) sml-mode update to version 4, and I'm volunteering to take over as maintainer; 2) ProofGeneral update to 3.7 final -- I'm the maintainer and submitting an upgrade; 3) Isabelle 2007 -- new package; and 4) polyml5 --

Re: [Fink-devel] New packages in tracker

2008-03-05 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Ridgway wrote: | Two of these were submitted on 2/16 and nothing has happened with | respect to them. One was submitted on 2/16 and a comment made upon it | on 2/24, which I responded to the same day; and the other was | submitted on 11/28;

[Fink-devel] gcc43 in 10.4/10.5 unstable

2008-03-05 Thread Jack Howarth
Now that the gcc 4.3.0 release tarballs are on the gcc.gnu.org ftp server, I have added the gcc43 package to fink 10.4/10.5 unstable. I would strongly recommend that we migrate all the packages that depend on gcc42 over to gcc43. Also we should make sure to use the -O3 optimization level if

Re: [Fink-devel] New packages in tracker

2008-03-05 Thread Alexander Hansen
Benjamin Reed wrote: John Ridgway wrote: | Two of these were submitted on 2/16 and nothing has happened with | respect to them. One was submitted on 2/16 and a comment made upon it | on 2/24, which I responded to the same day; and the other was | submitted on 11/28; with no response until