Ray Zimmerman wrote:
On Apr 2, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Ray Zimmerman wrote:
There is a bug in g95 0.90 that is affecting me and I'm told it's
fixed in 0.91. Is there any chance that whoever put together the
fink package for 0.90 could update it to 0.91? I
On Apr 4, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Ray Zimmerman wrote:
1. It wants to link against the dynamic libgfortran preventing my
MEX file from working on machines that don't have gfortran
installed. The only way I can get it to link against the static
libgfortran is to
I've updated pdftk in fink unstable to the latest 1.41 release
for Matthias Ringwald. In case anyone is wondering why we left the
package building against gcc42, the reason is that the upstream
code is actually broken and just happens to work under prior releases.
The author of the pdftk is
I did the g95-0.90-3 packaging so that we could compile
ncarg under darwin9. The blockdata-test required by ncarg
currently fails on darwin8 and darwin9 with gfortran. If
that wasn't a problem, we could have depreciated g95 out
of fink unstable entirely.
On the postive side, Xcode 3.1 will
