It is has been suggested that the SuiteSparse static libraries be
converted to dynamic libraries instead.
Rather than attempt to modify the makefiles directly, I'd like to
try to directly convert the static libraries to dynamic ones.
My thought is to do something like
# Extract the object
Ben Abbott wrote:
It is has been suggested that the SuiteSparse static libraries be
converted to dynamic libraries instead.
Why are they static? Are they shared libraries on other platforms? Who
suggested the change?
Rather than attempt to modify the makefiles directly, I'd like to
try to
On Apr 10, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Ben Abbott wrote:
It is has been suggested that the SuiteSparse static libraries be
converted to dynamic libraries instead.
Why are they static? Are they shared libraries on other platforms? Who
suggested the change?
They are originally
On Apr 10, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Ben Abbott wrote:
It is has been suggested that the SuiteSparse static libraries be
converted to dynamic libraries instead.
Why are they static? Are they shared libraries on other platforms? Who
suggested the change?
They aren't static
Ben Abbott wrote:
On Apr 10, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Ben Abbott wrote:
It is has been suggested that the SuiteSparse static libraries be
converted to dynamic libraries instead.
Why are they static? Are they shared libraries on other platforms? Who
suggested the change?
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:17:08PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Following up:
I've made a couple of changes on James' tracker item. It appeared to build
OK as far as I could see.
I'm cc'ing the current mplayer and libdvdnav maintainers
Thanks Alexander. Those changes look good to me =)
On Apr 10, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Ben Abbott wrote:
On Apr 10, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Ben Abbott wrote:
It is has been suggested that the SuiteSparse static libraries be
converted to dynamic libraries instead.
Why are they static? Are they shared
