On Apr 12, 2008, at 12:35 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 12 Apr 2008, at 05:26, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 12 Apr 2008, at 05:05, Ben Abbott wrote:
With regards to --all ... do you mean that all the .o files
included
in the static lib are not to be included in the dylib? ... or
I'm trying to validate a package whose build chain requires
simultaneous installation of libdvdread3-shlibs and libdvd4-shlibs.
This is impossible, because the packages conflict. Looking at the
versions, libdvdread4 is newer than libdvdread3, so would it be OK to
convert packages that
On Apr 12, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
I'm trying to validate a package whose build chain requires
simultaneous installation of libdvdread3-shlibs and libdvd4-shlibs.
Make that libdvdread4-shlibs.
This is impossible, because the packages conflict. Looking at the
versions,
On 12 Apr 2008, at 20:12, Alexander Hansen wrote:
On Apr 12, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
I'm trying to validate a package whose build chain requires
simultaneous installation of libdvdread3-shlibs and libdvd4-shlibs.
Make that libdvdread4-shlibs.
This is impossible,
On 12 Apr 2008, at 17:46, Ben Abbott wrote:
I was hoping to extract the object code from the static libraries
(using ax -x libname.a) and then build the dylibs from that. Thus,
I'd minimize changes the build process for SuiteSparse.
This is the correct approach.
Any reason such an approach
