Re: [Fink-devel] Updated mplayer (#1885675)

2008-04-26 Thread James Bunton
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:03:15PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: OK, I'd like to add these updates to Fink on Saturday. People should object before then. I've updated the tracker with a version that uses the new libdvdread.3 package. --- James pgpCbnLoaSn4K.pgp Description: PGP

[Fink-devel] libx264 depends on gdk-pixbuf

2008-04-26 Thread James Bunton
Hi, The mplayer package that I'm working on (tracker #1885675) depends on libx264-57-shlibs which depends on gdk-pixbuf, which depends on gnome-libs-dev. I'm not sure why libx264 has this dependency on gdk-pixbuf. It compiles and works for me well without it and this saves my poor old Powerbook

[Fink-devel] gtk+2 and librsvg2

2008-04-26 Thread William Scott
gtk+2 seems to build and link to /sw/lib/librsvg-2.2.dylib when present, but silently not do so in its absence. I've had a number of people complain to me about icons not displaying right in coot depending on build-order, and I am at least somewhat certain this is where the problem lies.

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 and librsvg2

2008-04-26 Thread Martin Costabel
William Scott wrote: gtk+2 seems to build and link to /sw/lib/librsvg-2.2.dylib when present, but silently not do so in its absence. I've had a number of people complain to me about icons not displaying right in coot depending on build-order, and I am at least somewhat certain this

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink packaging update: pangocairo ready for testing

2008-04-26 Thread Martin Costabel
Daniel Macks wrote: Fink will be deploying the long-awaited gnome upgrade, often called pangocairo soon. Please don't wait too long. Seriously maintaining 4 versions 10.4/{stable,unstable} and 10.4-pangocairo/{stable,unstable} in addition to the 10.4/10.5 and ppc/intel alternatives is

[Fink-devel] pangocairo: gconf2 vs. libxml2

2008-04-26 Thread Max Horn
Hi, using the 10.4 pangocairo branch: Can't resolve dependency libxml2-shlibs (= 2.6.30-1) for package gconf2-2.20.1-1 (no matching packages/versions found) Cheers, Max - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008

Re: [Fink-devel] mesa-libglw and openmotif4

2008-04-26 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:09:45PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: In working up some test packaging for a new openmotif4 package (to provide openmotif 2.3.0), I discovered that my current mesa-libglw package is explicitly linking libXm into libGLw.dylib. By comparision, the mesa-libglw package

Re: [Fink-devel] pangocairo: gconf2 vs. libxml2

2008-04-26 Thread Max Horn
Am 26.04.2008 um 19:43 schrieb Max Horn: Hi, using the 10.4 pangocairo branch: Can't resolve dependency libxml2-shlibs (= 2.6.30-1) for package gconf2-2.20.1-1 (no matching packages/versions found) Oh yeah, forgot this: Caladan-II:~/Desktop/WordPress$ fink list libxml2 Scanning package

Re: [Fink-devel] libx264 depends on gdk-pixbuf

2008-04-26 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 12:28:52AM +1000, James Bunton wrote: Hi, The mplayer package that I'm working on (tracker #1885675) depends on libx264-57-shlibs which depends on gdk-pixbuf, which depends on gnome-libs-dev. I'm not sure why libx264 has this dependency on gdk-pixbuf. It compiles

Re: [Fink-devel] pangocairo: gconf2 vs. libxml2

2008-04-26 Thread Martin Costabel
Max Horn wrote: Am 26.04.2008 um 19:43 schrieb Max Horn: Hi, using the 10.4 pangocairo branch: Can't resolve dependency libxml2-shlibs (= 2.6.30-1) for package gconf2-2.20.1-1 (no matching packages/versions found) Oh yeah, forgot this: Caladan-II:~/Desktop/WordPress$ fink list

Re: [Fink-devel] gtk+2 and librsvg2

2008-04-26 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 05:39:16PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: William Scott wrote: gtk+2 seems to build and link to /sw/lib/librsvg-2.2.dylib when present, but silently not do so in its absence. I've had a number of people complain to me about icons not displaying right in

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink packaging update: pangocairo ready for testing

2008-04-26 Thread Pierre-Henri Lavigne
Yhellow, I got the same problem while compiling gnash, in the case with freetype 219 enabled. I told yesterday in IRC I got an error while compiling gimp2 with the new pango-cairo testing branches. Idem looking for a missing /sw/lib/libpango-1.0.la I don't know how to solve that. I switched back

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink packaging update: pangocairo ready for testing

2008-04-26 Thread Martin Costabel
Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote: Yhellow, I got the same problem while compiling gnash, in the case with freetype 219 enabled. I told yesterday in IRC I got an error while compiling gimp2 with the new pango-cairo testing branches. Idem looking for a missing /sw/lib/libpango-1.0.la This must

Re: [Fink-devel] mesa-libglw and openmotif4

2008-04-26 Thread Martin Costabel
Jean-François Mertens wrote: [] I see the following diff : 7c7 Depends: x11, openmotif3-shlibs, %N-shlibs (= %v-%r) --- Depends: x11, %N-shlibs (= %v-%r) 12c12 make OPT_FLAGS=-O3 -I%p/include LIB_DIR=lib darwin --- make OPT_FLAGS=-O3 -I%p/include LIB_DIR=lib darwin LDFLAGS=-

Re: [Fink-devel] mesa-libglw and openmotif4

2008-04-26 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 26 Apr 2008, at 20:29, Martin Costabel wrote: Jean-François Mertens wrote: [] I see the following diff : ... Why should these symbols be picked up if -lXm is not on the linker line and Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup is present? Sorry, had forgotten to diff the patch file too.. JF

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink packaging update: pangocairo ready for testing

2008-04-26 Thread Martin Costabel
Martin Costabel wrote: Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote: Yhellow, I got the same problem while compiling gnash, in the case with freetype 219 enabled. I told yesterday in IRC I got an error while compiling gimp2 with the new pango-cairo testing branches. Idem looking for a missing

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink packaging update: pangocairo ready for testing

2008-04-26 Thread Kevin Horton
On 26 Apr 2008, at 14:51, Alexander Hansen wrote: On Apr 26, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Kevin Horton wrote: We need to move packages much more quickly from the unstable to stable trees. The concept of waiting for adequate positive feedback does not work, IMHO, as people who are happy with

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink packaging update: pangocairo ready for testing

2008-04-26 Thread Max Horn
Am 26.04.2008 um 20:21 schrieb Martin Costabel: Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote: Yhellow, I got the same problem while compiling gnash, in the case with freetype 219 enabled. I told yesterday in IRC I got an error while compiling gimp2 with the new pango-cairo testing branches. Idem looking

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink packaging update: pangocairo ready for testing

2008-04-26 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Apr 26, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Kevin Horton wrote: On 26 Apr 2008, at 14:51, Alexander Hansen wrote: On Apr 26, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Kevin Horton wrote: We need to move packages much more quickly from the unstable to stable trees. The concept of waiting for adequate positive feedback does

Re: [Fink-devel] pangocairo: gconf2 vs. libxml2

2008-04-26 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Max Horn wrote: | Update: I just got a suspicion, and run touch on the .info file. | Now fink recognized that it was new. Ouch. I thought fink index | would force the index to be rebuilt, but obviously that is not the | case. I will now manually

Re: [Fink-devel] pangocairo: gconf2 vs. libxml2

2008-04-26 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Apr 26, 2008, at 3:54 PM, Max Horn wrote: Am 26.04.2008 um 19:55 schrieb Martin Costabel: Max Horn wrote: Am 26.04.2008 um 19:43 schrieb Max Horn: Hi, using the 10.4 pangocairo branch: Can't resolve dependency libxml2-shlibs (= 2.6.30-1) for package gconf2-2.20.1-1 (no matching

Re: [Fink-devel] mesa-libglw and openmotif4

2008-04-26 Thread Jack Howarth
JF, Don't forget that I had to manually add the -lXm to the link flags in the original mesa-libglw patch. I would argue that the approach to leave the these symbols undefined and suppress the error is more convention. The fedora developers don't link libGLw against a specific motif and their

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink packaging update: pangocairo ready for testing

2008-04-26 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:16:25PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: Martin Costabel wrote: [] cd /sw/fink/10.4 mv stable /dev/null mv unstable stable mv pangocairo-branch/unstable unstable I know it's a dream, After looking for a while at the state of

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink packaging update: pangocairo ready for testing

2008-04-26 Thread Martin Costabel
Daniel Macks wrote: [] Keeping a pre-pangocairo/stable tree alongside a pangocairo/unstable tree will not work, either. How could we then move packages from unstable to stable? Mixing stable and unstable (i.e., using older stable packages once one has started using unstable, or

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink packaging update: pangocairo ready for testing

2008-04-26 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 12:37:57AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: Daniel Macks wrote: [] Keeping a pre-pangocairo/stable tree alongside a pangocairo/unstable tree will not work, either. How could we then move packages from unstable to stable? Mixing stable and unstable (i.e., using

Re: [Fink-devel] mesa-libglw and openmotif4

2008-04-26 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 26 Apr 2008, at 22:49, Jack Howarth wrote: JF, Don't forget that I had to manually add the -lXm to the link flags in the original mesa-libglw patch. I would argue that the approach to leave the these symbols undefined and suppress the error is more convention. The fedora developers