Hi there,
after upgrading dvdbackup to the last package revision it seems that
libdvdread has lost its ability to use libdvdcss. You can get the
picture from data reported below:
% fink list libdvdcss
Information about 6961 packages read in 1 seconds.
i libdvdcss 1.2.9-1
was the dlopen path and file name correct, it could be left over from
a new compat version or it might need to be patched not to use .so? I
didn't do the lastest updates so I'll have to look into it in a month
when I have time again.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org/
Chaos is the beginning
There's no dlopen *path* IIRC, just filename. Usually, if the package
can do real linking (instead of runtime dlopen), that's gonna me more
stable in general. But that makes the dep mandatory...not sure how
onerous a package and dependency-tree for libdvdcss is.
dan
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at
The big problem is that using dvdcss it'll have to be crypto then, I
wanted to avoid this and it's why the dlopen option is avail, it'll
only use it if avail.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org/
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 6-May-08, at 8:24 AM, Daniel Macks
Hello,
If /sw/lib/pango-ft219/lib/pkgconfig/xrender.pc exists,
pkg-config (0.22-3) seems to confuse about the search path
for --cflags and --libs.
For example:
[existing case]
$
PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/sw/lib/pango-ft219/lib/pkgconfig:/sw/lib/fontconfig2/lib/pkgconfig:/sw/lib/freetype219/lib/pkgconfig
On Apr 26, 2008, at 6:33 PM, Charles C. Kankelborg wrote:
Hi,
I just built 0.20.5. unrtf mostly works, but segfaults after
producing apparently correct output:
kankel% unrtf --text /tmp/onetouchlog0.txt
### Translation from RTF performed by UnRTF, version 0.20.5
### document uses
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 10:17:32PM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
I've tried to write an expanded error message for the situation where
the validator encounters a shared library in a .deb which is not
listed in the Shlibs field. (The code is in HEAD, but not yet
released.) Here's a
I've tried to write an expanded error message for the situation where
the validator encounters a shared library in a .deb which is not
listed in the Shlibs field. (The code is in HEAD, but not yet
released.) Here's a sample error message:
Validating .deb file
On May 6, 2008, at 10:33 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 10:17:32PM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
I've tried to write an expanded error message for the situation where
the validator encounters a shared library in a .deb which is not
listed in the Shlibs field. (The code is
