Well, I'm embarrassed to say it, but I can't get fink to recognize this
6.0 package. Is there something tricky about unzip-10.4 regarding how
it's labelled or something?
Jack Howarth wrote:
This should build fine as a subsitute for the current
unzip-10.4.info...
Package: unzip
Version:
Robert,
Try changing...
Revision: 1
...to...
Revision: 100
I thought that the variants had to either be of the
same version but a greater revision or have an epoch
if the version in the variant was smaller than the
main package file. So the current unzip-10.4.info
should have been epoched,
See if updating your package description cache via fink index -f will
make it show up.
Robert Wyatt wrote:
Well, I'm embarrassed to say it, but I can't get fink to recognize
this 6.0 package. Is there something tricky about unzip-10.4 regarding
how it's labelled or something?
snip
Alexander,
When one has two packages,
foobar.info
foobar-10.4.info
where foobar.info has...
Version: 1.0
Revision: 1.0
Distribution: 10.5, 10.6
and foobar-10.4.info has...
Version: 1.0
Revision: 1.0
Distribution: 10.4
I thought the foobar-10.4.info is ignored by fink
unless the Revision
Jack Howarth wrote:
Robert,
Try changing...
Revision: 1
...to...
Revision: 100
I thought that the variants had to either be of the
same version but a greater revision or have an epoch
if the version in the variant was smaller than the
main package file. So the current
I'll offer the counterexample of octoplot, which has the same revision
for 10.4 and 10.5, but uses a separate .info because different patches
are needed.
oops. Make that
octplot-x11 or octplot-aqua
--
Let
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 09:28:59AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
Robert,
Try changing...
Revision: 1
...to...
Revision: 100
I thought that the variants had to either be of the
same version but a greater revision or have an epoch
if the version in the variant was smaller than the
A few days a go I updated module-build-pm with a new upstream version.
I'd appreciate it if any of you can have another look at the package
and make sure all issues have been resolved.
Also, I am using a PPC and will be on 10.5, so I have no idea if there
any issues on SL. Feel free to fix those
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 10:13:44AM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
I'll offer the counterexample of octoplot, which has the same revision
for 10.4 and 10.5, but uses a separate .info because different patches
are needed.
oops. Make that
octplot-x11 or octplot-aqua
So, is
On Sep 3, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
A few days a go I updated module-build-pm with a new upstream version.
I'd appreciate it if any of you can have another look at the package
and make sure all issues have been resolved.
Also, I am using a PPC and will be on 10.5, so I have
seems to be missing a build dependency on suitesparse
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what
This built and installed just fine Jack.
Jack Howarth wrote:
This should build fine as a subsitute for the current
unzip-10.4.info...
Package: unzip
Version: 6.0
Revision: 1
Distribution: 10.4
Maintainer: Fink Core Group fink-c...@lists.sourceforge.net
License: BSD
Essential: yes
Remind me why:
BuildConflicts: bzip2-dev
is a good idea?
dan
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 06:37:51PM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
This built and installed just fine Jack.
Jack Howarth wrote:
This should build fine as a subsitute for the current
unzip-10.4.info...
Package: unzip
Daniel Macks wrote:
Remind me why:
BuildConflicts: bzip2-dev
is a good idea?
dan
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 06:37:51PM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
This built and installed just fine Jack.
DanI have no idea what the motivations were for that./Dan
JackIt seems to work in the 10.4 stable
Dear fink developers,
I have finished my pruning of the stable tree, removing from 10.6 or
x86_64 those packages which did not build for me there.
At this point, please feel free to make improvements to our 10.6-i386
and 10.6-x86_64 distributions. You can move packages to stable which
are
15 matches
Mail list logo
