Re: [Fink-devel] inherited_linker_flags

> On Jul 11, 2017, at 6:14 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser > <f...@snaggledworks.com> wrote: > > On 7/9/17 9:00 PM, David Reiser wrote: >> gnutls30 inserts: >> inherited_linker_flags=' -framework Security -framework CoreFoundation’ >> in its .la files. An

[Fink-devel] inherited_linker_flags

gnutls30 inserts: inherited_linker_flags=' -framework Security -framework CoreFoundation’ in its .la files. And the validator complains at the end of the package build. I tried one fix of inserting 4 '-Wl,' in line in the Makefile.in, but that broke the build sooner. What’s the right way to

Re: [Fink-devel] Packaging Problem

Scratching my head here. I'm only doing "fink -m build regina", not a full install yet. Install phase does this: > /usr/bin/install -m 755 -c ./rxstack.init.d > /sw/src/fink.build/root-regina-3.8.2-3/sw/sbin/rxstack-control but the validator doesn't like it: > Validating

Re: [Fink-devel] Packaging Problem

On 2016 Mar 2, at 08:35, Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Files: lib/libregina.0.dylib lib/libtest1.0.dylib lib/libtest2.0.dylib Durn, dunno how that got by the search & replace. Thanks! David Lowe doctorjl...@earthlink.net The Doctor: A

[Fink-devel] Packaging Problem

I'm trying to revive the dormant "Regina" package. This new info file is based on the old one, but i had to make changes because the new upstream version renamed some components ('libtest1.0.dylib -> librxtest1.0.dylib, etc.) Fine, so i did a search Now compile phase finishes okeh,

[Fink-devel] Audacious Package

So i was looking into updating the currently unmaintained Audacious package. We have version 2.2, upstream has 3.7. Since our package names actually start with "audacious2", would it be better to make the new package set as audacious3-*? sent from Mountain Lion The Doctor: Your

Re: [Fink-devel] My packages are up for adoption

keep up with them. I could probably take on the wx stuff. Sent from David-Lowes-Mac-mini The Doctor: You know when grown-ups tell you everything's going to be fine, but you really think they're lying to make you feel better? Amelia: Yeah... The Doctor: Everything'

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink

Yes, well, I'm on Lion… On Nov 23, 2015, at 9:28 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > >> On Nov 23, 2015, at 08:06, Max Horn <m...@quendi.de> wrote: >> >> Hi Dave, >> [CC: fink-devel], >> >>> On 22 Nov 2015, at 21:39, David R. Morrison <d...@mat

Re: [Fink-devel] Transition of packages from system-openssl-dev

On 10/14/2015 12:23, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On Oct 14, 2015, at 09:13, Daniel Macks wrote: >> >> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:58:58 -0500, Hanspeter Niederstrasser >> wrote: >> Dear Fink Developer, >>> As you may be aware, OS X 10.11 does not provide a

[Fink-devel] TheCaptain branch looking for patch files in the wrong place

I’m trying to build the experimental glib2-shlibs. The info file is in: /sw/fink/10.7/local/main/finkinfo/glib2-shlibs.info The patch files are in the same directory, but trying to build glib2-shlibs ends with an error: Failed: Cannot read PatchFile

Re: [Fink-devel] TheCaptain branch looking for patch files in the wrong place

-- Dave Reiser dbrei...@icloud.com On Aug 7, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 7, 2015, at 13:21, David Reiser dbrei...@icloud.com wrote: I’m trying to build the experimental glib2-shlibs. The info file is in: /sw/fink/10.7/local/main

Re: [Fink-devel] qt4-base-mac build failure on 10.10.2

On Mar 20, 2015, at 7:15 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser f...@snaggledworks.com wrote: On 3/19/2015 9:46 PM, David Reiser wrote: g++ -c -pipe -Xarch_x86_64 -mmacosx-version-min=10.10 -Wall -Wextra -Wreturn-type -fno-strict-aliasing -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat-security -Wreturn

[Fink-devel] qt4-base-mac build failure on 10.10.2

g++ -c -pipe -Xarch_x86_64 -mmacosx-version-min=10.10 -Wall -Wextra -Wreturn-type -fno-strict-aliasing -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat-security -Wreturn-type -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-switch -Wno-switch-enum -Wundef -Wmissing-noreturn -Winit-self -I/sw/include -arch

Re: [Fink-devel] broken autogen

Even better, thanks again! David, I checked in the alternative fix from upstream as autogen-5.18.4-2. If the quotes are removed from the instance of... find_libguiledir ${LGCFLAGS} in autoopts/mk-tpl-config.sh, the script is able to walk through the fields of the Cflags reported from

Re: [Fink-devel] broken autogen

Jack, Odd. __scm.h should come from guile20-dev, which is listed as a bdep. Can you confirm its presence? Fang David, The current autogen-5.18.2-6 packaging produces a broken autogen. While trying to regenerate the fix includes for a gcc patch... https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc

Re: [Fink-devel] broken autogen

Jack, Ahh, I responded too soon. Thanks for triaging this issue. Your fix looks like something I would have done. You have my permission to commit this fix. Fang David, I have posted packaging on fink tracking for autogen-5.18.4-1 which passes 'fink -m' and properly generates

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

Alex, On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu wrote: Hi all, Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib validation because the install_names for shlibs all start with @rpath

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 11/8/14, 1:03 PM, David Fang wrote: Alex, On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu wrote: Hi all, Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging that bootstraps (much like its

[Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

on the status/issues/obstacles? Such a fix would unblock llvm35 from hitting dists. Thanks! Fang -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- ___ Fink-devel mailing list

Re: [Fink-devel] hot fixes for yosemite

in some places). Thanks, Fang David. I've updated gcc49, gmp5 and libmpfr4 to all build with the configure patch applied to insure that they are not linked as if Puma was in use. The new revision bump of gcc49 now produces prestine fortran test suite results for the first time under

[Fink-devel] Error: package contains the shared library

I'm attempting to package 'regina', which is an interpreter for the 'rexx' programming language. It's also my first info file from scratch. After solving a few build issues, the validator now complains about things i couldn't readily find fixes for in a web search: Validating .deb

Re: [Fink-devel] Error: package contains the shared library

On 2014 Sep 29, at 1:38 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: It looks like you might have been reinventing the wheel: Silly me, i had thought that 'fink list rexx' 'fink list regina' was sufficient due diligence. Should i assume that the reason the old package

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-0.37.0 fails to build under Mavericks 10.9 with Xcode-6

Tried 0.37.1 and it failed to build fink install apt. On host: Darwin myhost 13.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 13.4.0: Sun Aug 17 19:50:11 PDT 2014; root:xnu-2422.115.4~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 gcc: Configured with: --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer//usr

Re: [Fink-devel] clang34/llvm34 built on Yosemite Beta

Hi John, Great to hear! I've been working with David Fang to get the clang34/llvm34 compiler suite to build under Yosemite Public Beta. Thanks to a recent patch by Jack Howarth (languages/llvm34-openmp-cmake.patch; 2014-08-15) these large packages now build, once a couple

Re: [Fink-devel] Results of 2014 Fink buildworld run on 10.9

On 2014 Aug 17, at 12:18 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser f...@snaggledworks.com wrote: I've just published the results of a buildworld run on a 10.9 system. Mr. Neiderstrasser, thanks for the test. However, i'm confused as to what is expected of me on this. My package [freeciv] is

Re: [Fink-devel] glib2 is out of date

On 2014 Aug 13, at 2:01 PM, David Lowe doctorjl...@verizon.net wrote: The latest build of freeciv will require glib2 = 2.32. False alarm. 2.32.x will be required for the GTK3 client, but as that part is optional [and not ready for production use anyway], we can continue to use 2.22.4

[Fink-devel] glib2 is out of date

Greetings! The latest build of freeciv will require glib2 = 2.32. I am currently downloading 2.32.2, but Gnome has a bewildering variety of versions up to 2.41, and i don't see an obvious demarcation of stable from unstable. Should we prefer some other version? sent from Mountain

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm34 testsuite

' what version do you see in the prompt? Fang David, It appears that the problem is that the python test harness requires fink bash to be installed. % bin/llvm-lit -vvv test/Analysis/BasicAA/2003-09-19-LocalArgument.ll -- Testing: 1 tests, 1 threads -- UNRESOLVED: LLVM :: Analysis/BasicAA/2003

Re: [Fink-devel] purging r-cran-* files from 10.7

fink-obsolete-packages is documented to be used. dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE

Re: [Fink-devel] gnutls man-in-the-middle security vulnerability

On Mar 23, 2014, at 10:40 PM, Daniel E. Macks dma...@netspace.org wrote: Kurt Schwehr kurtschw...@yahoo.com said: Dave, Are you aware of this? http://www.gnutls.org/security.html#GNUTLS-SA-2014-2 http://lwn.net/Articles/589205/ I added a one line warning to the gnutls28.info file,

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm-gcc42 conflicts with ccache-default

directly in %p/bin. I am entirely open to suggestions. Fang -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that developers love is also

[Fink-devel] gnome-keyring failure with Xcode 5

libtool: link: gcc -dynamiclib -o .libs/libgp11.0.dylib .libs/gp11-attributes.o .libs/gp11-call.o .libs/gp11-misc.o .libs/gp11-module.o .libs/gp11-object.o .libs/gp11-session.o .libs/gp11-slot.o .libs/gp11-marshal.o -L/sw/lib /sw/lib/libgthread-2.0.dylib /sw/lib/libgio-2.0.dylib

Re: [Fink-devel] gnome-keyring failure with Xcode 5

On Sep 22, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: On 9/22/13 10:17 AM, David Reiser wrote: libtool: link: gcc -dynamiclib -o .libs/libgp11.0.dylib .libs/gp11-attributes.o .libs/gp11-call.o .libs/gp11-misc.o .libs/gp11-module.o .libs/gp11-object.o .libs/gp11

Re: [Fink-devel] EOL for 10.5 and 10.6

On Jun 19, 2013, at 8:02 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: In view of simplifying our lives we've got a few options here: 1) EOL 10.5, and defer 10.6 for a while. This could be done essentially immediately, with all of the 10.5 packages being stashed in a 10.5-EOL directory similarly to we

[Fink-devel] OT architecture problem [was: Dependencies For New Package]

On May 21, 2013, at 10:47 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: 2) Patch Makefile to replace '-lGL -lGLU' with '-Wl,-framework,OpenGL' This is the way i went, as i'm not gonna put together an info file until i'm sure it compiles by hand. Now that the dependencies seem to be taken care of i

Re: [Fink-devel] Dependencies For New Package

On May 15, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: 1) OpenGL typically comes either via the OpenGL framework, or via X11. In the former case, no dependency needs to be declared, because that comes with the OS and we don't have a virtual package for it. For the latter, even though it

[Fink-devel] Dependencies For New Package

Alright i'm gonna make an attempt to create a .info file from scratch. I have verified that my candidate [SDL-Ball] is not currently in the database. There is a similar game [lbreakout], but this one is prettier and works correctly with a mouse. Now i need some advice on

Re: [Fink-devel] error building gcc44 and gcc45

On May 6, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:02:34AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: On May 6, 2013, at 6:33 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 04:59:42PM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: Jack, I get errors building the latest versions

Re: [Fink-devel] error building gcc44 and gcc45

On May 6, 2013, at 6:33 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 04:59:42PM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: Jack, I get errors building the latest versions of gcc44 and gcc45 on 10.6, i386 . I have Xcode 3.2.6 but if that's too old, the packages should tell me so. I reproduce

[Fink-devel] error building gcc44 and gcc45

Jack, I get errors building the latest versions of gcc44 and gcc45 on 10.6, i386 . I have Xcode 3.2.6 but if that's too old, the packages should tell me so. I reproduce the error msg from gcc44 below; the one from gcc45 was similar. Based on the error msg, I guessed that maybe I needed to

Re: [Fink-devel] error building gcc44 and gcc45

Yes, I use tcsh, and which makeinfo now gives me /sw/opt/texinfo-legacy/bin/makeinfo (to which I say opt???), but unfortunately the build failed just as before. -- Dave On May 5, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 5/5/13 4:59 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Jack, I get errors

Re: [Fink-devel] error building gcc44 and gcc45

I started a new shell, to be on the safe side… On May 5, 2013, at 6:11 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Yeah, %p/opt has been around a while. :-) Did you start a new shell session or re-source /sw/bin/init.tcsh ? On 5/5/13 5:59 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Yes, I use tcsh, and which makeinfo

Re: [Fink-devel] [gtk+2, 10.4] missing text issues

and everything else that had been linked to 1.12, but i do now have fonts. Tested with xchat and geany. Whee! -Mike -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- Precog is a next-generation analytics platform

Re: [Fink-devel] updating libtiff

Yes, please go ahead and commit the new version. -- Dave On Feb 25, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Dave, I'm packaging the latest libtiff that bumps libN (to libtiff5), and taking the opportunity to update our existing libtiff to the last of that line. Here's the

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink graphviz 2.26.3-6 build fails on 10.8.2

: ln -s /opt/X11/include/X11 /usr/local/include/X11 I'm guessing that a simple patch to the package, adding the real location to the include directory search list, should fix the problem cleanly. Thanks, Peter -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com

[Fink-devel] fink is ignoring my already downloaded tarball

OK, I'll ask you some questions and update the configuration file in '/sw/etc/fink.conf'. In what additional directory should Fink look for downloaded tarballs? [~/Downloads] $ ls ~/Downloads/f* /Users/doctorjlowe/Downloads/freeciv-2.3.3.tar.bz2 [doctorjlowe@David-Lowes-MacBook-Pro

Re: [Fink-devel] fink is ignoring my already downloaded tarball

On 2012 Dec 12, at 7:32 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: I _thought_ that I had the current fink set up to complain if the FetchAltDir doesn't have appropriate permissions. Actually once i fed the expanded directory to 'fink configure' it not only complained, but directed me to make the

[Fink-devel] Web Site

So, i couldn't get the package database a few days ago … I tried again just now and still no luck. Further, i'm not even getting a response from www.finkproject.org except through ping. Is this a known issue? sent from Lion Homer: Volunteering is for suckers. Did you know that so

Re: [Fink-devel] [fink-core] gettext-tools madness

On Sep 1, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: On 9/1/12 1:07 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: On 9/1/2012 10:32 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 8/31/12 5:36 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: Why exactly are we building the entirety of gettext-tools at -O0 in

Re: [Fink-devel] libcurl multiple choice

On 2012 Aug 14, at 12:27 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: You want libcurl4. As always, Mr. Hansen, thanks for the rapid and informative response. sent from Lion My precious. -- Live Security Virtual Conference

Re: [Fink-devel] OT: M4 the SDL Framework

On 2012 Jul 31, at 4:15 PM, TheSin wrote: dpkg -S sdl-config sdl: /sw/bin/sdl-config sdl is the dev files for fink installed sdl, I'm not sure what you are trying to build that needs sdl but it likely just does no know about your fink installation. Check that you have sdl installed, if

Re: [Fink-devel] OT: M4 the SDL Framework

On 2012 Aug 1, at 10:39 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: Given sdl using sdl-config and sdl.pc as the ways to publish flags, which is the problem here: those file(s) not being found by [the build-system of whatever you are trying to compile against SDL], or that build-system not handling them

[Fink-devel] OT: M4 the SDL Framework

I raised an issue with the libSDL project that their provided automake macro is incapable of detecting and configuring their provided runtime framework. Sam Lantinga responded with: I typically build and install SDL on Mac OS X using the unix style configure/install which works fine.

[Fink-devel] Are We Sure About Those Extra Bits?

So i recently installed installed Fink on my wife's old Mini, and was rather surprised when the installer told me i could choose a 64 bit tree. This Mini has Core Solo processor and it won't accept Lion due to its only being capable of 32 bit operations. Am i seeing things, or is our

Re: [Fink-devel] Are We Sure About Those Extra Bits?

On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:18 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: The current test rules that a machine is 64-bit capable if one of those is set. I get these results on 10.6.8: Darlene-Lowes-Mac-mini:~ (228) $ sysctl hw.optional.x86_64 hw.optional.x86_64: 0 Darlene-Lowes-Mac-mini:~ (229) $ sysctl

Re: [Fink-devel] RFC: minor change to passwd behavior on 10.7

Sounds like a good idea to me. -- Dave Sent from my iPhone On Jul 13, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser f...@snaggledworks.com wrote: Currently, if a new passwd-package is created, passwd-core gets a new version and so all the other passwd-* packages need to be rebuilt and

Re: [Fink-devel] system-perl Provides of extra (noncore) modules

Good point. The reason this was done is documented in the perlXXX.info file, but you are right that it creates potential upgrade problems. I guess what we need is a package called perlXXX-upgrade which is a bundle that depends on all these non-core pm's. Would that solve it, or am I

Re: [Fink-devel] system-perl Provides of extra (noncore) modules

:59 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: Good point. The reason this was done is documented in the perlXXX.info file, but you are right that it creates potential upgrade problems. I guess what we need is a package called perlXXX-upgrade which is a bundle that depends on all these non-core pm's

Re: [Fink-devel] New dpkg and fink-virtual-pkgs

On Jul 2, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 21:59:43 +0200, Sjors Gielen sj...@sjorsgielen.nl wrote: Op 01-07-12 21:54, TheSin schreef: would we rather it silently do it or with a warning but still pass? I assume no warning but thought I'd show an example.

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Massive update tonight failed ...

Is there any possibility that we can just disable the need for Tex by telling some package with a configure option that it should build it's Tex docs? -- Dave On Jun 29, 2012, at 9:50 AM, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: I already thought of these options, the problem would be the

Re: [Fink-devel] -pm5123

On Jun 29, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: Dear Fink developers, At the time of the upgrade to 10.7, many fink -pm5123 packages were limited to Distribution: 10.7 only. Since we will make perl 5.1.23 available in 10.8, that restriction is no longer necessary or appropriate. On

Re: [Fink-devel] -pm5123

On Jun 29, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: On 6/29/2012 1:13 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: On Jun 29, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: Dear Fink developers, At the time of the upgrade to 10.7, many fink -pm5123 packages were limited to Distribution: 10.7 only

Re: [Fink-devel] New dpkg and fink-virtual-pkgs

My recollection is that we hacked the dpkg code to allow unversioned virtuals at the time we introduced virtual pkgs. -- Dave On Jun 29, 2012, at 2:01 PM, TheSin wrote: So I'm not sure how but the old dpkg seemed to not check version of fink-virtuals, the patch I'm using is pretty much

[Fink-devel] -pm5123

Dear Fink developers, At the time of the upgrade to 10.7, many fink -pm5123 packages were limited to Distribution: 10.7 only. Since we will make perl 5.1.23 available in 10.8, that restriction is no longer necessary or appropriate. On behalf of the fink-core team, I plan to alter such

Re: [Fink-devel] new debianutils and mktemp/readlink

/usr/bin/readlink is present on both 10.6 and 10.5. -- Dave On Jun 27, 2012, at 7:44 AM, TheSin wrote: it turns out that Lion have /usr/bin/readlink as well, can anyone confirm this on 10.6/10.5 if so then it won't matter if I replace debianutils. --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/

Re: [Fink-devel] github?

On 2012 Jun 22, at 2:35 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Buildworlds and dist-wide package roundups (like unstable-stable or multi-package dep upgrades) need a lot of overlapping local modifications and VCS-updating steps, and I stopped trying to do local fixes in the only non-Fink git

Re: [Fink-devel] github?

On Jun 24, 2012, at 10:17 AM, David Lowe wrote: On 2012 Jun 22, at 2:35 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Buildworlds and dist-wide package roundups (like unstable-stable or multi-package dep upgrades) need a lot of overlapping local modifications and VCS-updating steps, and I stopped

Re: [Fink-devel] github?

On Jun 22, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Any thoughts about moving dists/ over to github? Even though sourceforge isn't going to close down CVS access, it'd be nice to move to a more modern system. Plus, for users behind firewalls, github allows files to be accessed via

Re: [Fink-devel] How to make Fink more user friendly?

On Jun 15, 2012, at 8:53 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 6/15/12 6:08 AM, Sébastien Maret wrote: Hi all, I spent most of this morning trying to install Fink on one of my colleague computer. This made me realize how complicated it is for the end-user. Pretty much everything that could get

Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release imminent

On May 13, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Merle Reinhart wrote: One possibility would be make the id static or dynamic based upon a configuration setting in fink.conf. I think you'll wind up with a lot less push-back from IT admins. We've done things like this in the past. We can store the desired

Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release imminent

I think Dustin's approach is a good one -- less intrusive to users' systems. -- Dave On May 10, 2012, at 4:32 AM, Dustin Cartwright wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: We're approaching the May 16 planned deadline for a new Fink

Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release imminent

build process it will have the wrong perms, unless things have changed since then. --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2012-05-10, at 6:33 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: I think Dustin's approach is a good one -- less intrusive

Re: [Fink-devel] Mountain lion updates.

On May 4, 2012, at 10:56 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 5/4/2012 8:54 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: My biggest concern with the 10.8 support is the situation with the perlmod packages. Specifically whether we could adjust fink to automatically handle the newer perl in each OS release without

Re: [Fink-devel] Mountain lion updates.

On Apr 29, 2012, at 10:57 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:43:33 -0700, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: We've got some maintainers (J. Howarth, H. Todd that I know of) who have access to Mountain Lion. Jack, in particular has been doing build tests. To

Re: [Fink-devel] Where do you guys find the time?

a little bit of time sometimes. I find time because it's interesting, and I figure I still owe a whole bunch of people for all the help they gave me through the years with community software of one sort or another. Dave -- David Reiser dbrei...@earthlink.net

Re: [Fink-devel] Variants and Package Overwrites

On 1 Mar, 2012, at 2:35 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: My new problem is that there is no configure option to disable creation of the manual. Now i *imagine* the fix would be a PreInstScript that goes into the build directory and deletes the manual subdirectory, but i'm open to any other ideas.

Re: [Fink-devel] Variants and Package Overwrites

On 19 Feb, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/19/12 12:52 PM, David Lowe wrote: So i finally get around to enabling the SDL version of the freeciv package. After overcoming a few small hurdles i now face this: Unpacking

[Fink-devel] Variants and Package Overwrites

So i finally get around to enabling the SDL version of the freeciv package. After overcoming a few small hurdles i now face this: Unpacking freeciv-sdl (from .../freeciv-sdl_2.3.1-13_darwin-i386.deb) ... /sw/bin/dpkg: error processing

Re: [Fink-devel] Validation tests for BuildDependsOnly

My recollection of the original idea was that there might be a package with binaries, static libs, and headers all together. I dont know if there are any such left, but if there are, they will need to be splitoffized to separate the binaries (should this change be made). -- Dave Sent from

Re: [Fink-devel] Validation tests for BuildDependsOnly

-only libraries and maybe some executables, and especially if also executables other packages tend to Depends on them. That makes it difficult to upgrade them to be shared or for backward-incompatible new libversions even if still static-only. dan On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:57:59 -0800, David R

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng15-x86 package

I'm curious where you are putting the dylibs? (haven't had a chance to look at the packages) -- Dave Sent from my iPhone On Jan 21, 2012, at 5:24 PM, Sjors Gielen sj...@sjorsgielen.nl wrote: Hi Alexander, Op 22-01-12 00:17, Alexander Hansen schreef: Let's try to stay close to our

Re: [Fink-devel] pidgin for osx 10.7?

itself, built for me on 10.7 this evening. -- Dave On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:07 PM, David Fang wrote: Hi, sorry to bother you, I was just wondering when there might be a fink package for 10.7. thanks! Hi, I still don't have a 10.7 machine to test on, and the last time I asked, there were

Re: [Fink-devel] FreeCiv vs. Lion

On 14 Jan, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Unfortunately yes. See below. I have Xcode 4.1 on OS X 10.7. With debugging off, it does finish building. I can provide full build logs for both debug and normal builds. To clarify, with debug off do you get 13

Re: [Fink-devel] pidgin for osx 10.7?

Hi Dave, Just a ping. What's the status of these? Fang The dependent packages not yet in 10.7 are: farsight2, libnice, and silc-toolkit. All three of these, and pidgin itself, built for me on 10.7 this evening. -- Dave On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:07 PM, David Fang wrote: Hi, sorry

[Fink-devel] FreeCiv vs. Lion

I'd be grateful if anybody with a clang setup would test this and tell me if we still have warnings under the new compiler. It *should* compile w/o problems when the debug ConfigureParam is turned off, but if we still have issues when it is turned on i will take those upstream...

Re: [Fink-devel] pidgin for osx 10.7?

linking/copying pidgin.info from the 10.4 tree and see if it just works on 10.7? To checkout the 10.4 tree on 10.7, just edit /sw/etc/fink.conf: SelfUpdateTrees: 10.7 10.4 and re-selfupdate. Fang -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com

Re: [Fink-devel] pidgin for osx 10.7?

The dependent packages not yet in 10.7 are: farsight2, libnice, and silc-toolkit. All three of these, and pidgin itself, built for me on 10.7 this evening. -- Dave On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:07 PM, David Fang wrote: Hi, sorry to bother you, I was just wondering when there might be a fink

Re: [Fink-devel] pidgin for osx 10.7?

this evening. -- Dave On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:07 PM, David Fang wrote: Hi, sorry to bother you, I was just wondering when there might be a fink package for 10.7. thanks! Hi, I still don't have a 10.7 machine to test on, and the last time I asked, there were still some dependencies missing

Re: [Fink-devel] libgeos problem

Thanks, I'll try 3.3.1. -- Dave On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Merle Reinhart wrote: Dave, I just noticed your post about libgeos not working in 10.7 with XCode compilers. I do know that libgeos 3.3.1 WILL successfully build in 10.7 with the XCode 4.2 clang compiler. I'm using

[Fink-devel] libgeos problem

There is a problem with libgeos on 10.7. The most recent XCode will not compile it, even using llvm-gcc-4.2. The MacPorts project is also aware of this; they actually have a package called apple-gcc-4.2 which provides the now-missing gcc-4.2 from apple for people who have upgraded XCode.

Re: [Fink-devel] updating fribidi

Thanks for noticing that. I did the update. -- Dave On Nov 26, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Dave, Is it possible to update Fink's fribidi to the latest upstream? A package I'm trying needs fribidi 0.19. According to the fribidi page, 0.19 is API/ABI compatible

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] fink update OS Lion failed

I wonder if we should put a test for Xcode version into the bootstrap, so that people get an error message which tells them what is wrong and suggests how to fix it? -- Dave On Nov 23, 2011, at 6:50 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/23/11

Re: [Fink-devel] enable path-prefix-clang for SL Xcode 4.2

On 16 Nov, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Max Horn wrote: But on the other hand, this also means that Xcode 4.2 on 10.6 now contains no reliable compiler at all :-(. I guess we can't simply declare this particular combination to be unsupported? Sent from my MacBookPro Friends come and friends

[Fink-devel] Update Freeciv stable

Please move freeciv_2.2.7 to stable. Sent from my MacBookPro Every man has a scheme that will not work. -- The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking

Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

On Oct 24, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:01:58AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: So at the very least, we should put a news item

Re: [Fink-devel] MD5 Problem?

On 21 Oct, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: 1) The field is PatchFile-MD5, not Patch-MD5 like you have. snip I guess i should not do this kind of thing when i'm sick. Then again, i was not aware that fink wouldn't complain over misspelled syntax. 2) The easiest way

[Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage warning users that fink on 10.6 is currently incompatible with Xcode 4.2, and suggesting a downgrade to Xcode 3.2.6. Another short-term measure would be to put a test into fink to check for Xcode 4.2 on 10.6, and warn users

Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage warning users that fink on 10.6 is currently incompatible with Xcode 4.2, and suggesting a downgrade

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.5 feedback needed for apt 0.5.4-1060

On 20 Oct, 2011, at 8:34 AM, Max Horn wrote: So, is anybody here using 10.5, and can provide feedback as to whether 0.5.4-1060 builds and works correctly? we need to know this for both Intel and PowerPC builds. It built without a hitch on PPC. I did some limited testing [apt-get

Re: [Fink-devel] libmpfr4-shlibs : assertion failure on Fink install

, is anything visibly different between your configuration and theirs? Fang Hi more data points: Xcode 4.2 on 10.6 and Xcode 4.1 on 10.7 was fine for me. best matthias On 08.10.2011, at 20:27, David Palmer wrote: Using Xcode 4.2 under Lion 10.7.1 and a fresh install of fink, when

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >