Re: [Fink-devel] Missing symbols in linking libatlas.dylib, 10.5.8/PowerPC w/Xcode 3.1.4

2012-06-08 Thread jfm
archdef 0, or forcing the use of PPCG[45]32AltiVec.tgz _ say with a -A flag (but there is already special code (due to Dominique Dhumieres) in the confflags for G4's, so the whole thing would need rethinking..). But please file bug-reports upstream, so we get real corrections ! JFm

Re: [Fink-devel] Missing symbols in linking libatlas.dylib, 10.5.8/PowerPC w/Xcode 3.1.4

2012-06-06 Thread jfm
On Jun 6, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 6/5/12 11:15 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 6/5/12 11:03 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: Alexander, Do you have a previous build of an earlier altas installed? A google on ATL_FreeAtomicCount undefined produced...

Re: [Fink-devel] Missing symbols in linking libatlas.dylib, 10.5.8/PowerPC w/Xcode 3.1.4

2012-06-06 Thread jfm
On Jun 6, 2012, at 6:59 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 6/6/12 9:41 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 6/6/12 9:37 AM, jfm wrote: On Jun 6, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 6/5/12 11:15 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 6/5/12 11:03 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: Alexander, Do you have

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype2-update

2005-02-26 Thread jfm
Hi Benjamin, I still get with mozilla : nsFreeType.cpp g++-3.3 -I/sw/lib/freetype2/include -I/sw/lib/freetype2/include/freetype2 -o nsFreeType.o -c -DOSTYPE=\Darwin7.8.0\ -DOSARCH=\Darwin\ -I../.. -I../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../dist/include/string -I../../../dist/include/pref

Re: [Fink-devel] octave question

2004-12-15 Thread jfm
On Dec 15, 2004, at 5:24 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Koen: Unfortunately, I'm still stuck on the octave package with Xcode 1.5. Even with the Nov gcc update, it still won't build - it dies building libcruft with errors like this: ld: misc/quit.o malformed object (stray relocation PAIR entry (1) in

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/crypto/finkinfo mozilla.info,1.5,1.6

2004-12-06 Thread jfm
On Dec 6, 2004, at 9:37 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: I only hope that the upcoming official mozilla/firefox fix will be backward compatible so that it doesn't *require* freetype=2.1.8. Yes _ their patch goes in that direction... Jean-Francois

[Fink-devel] Re: lynx-2.8.4-24

2004-11-07 Thread jfm
Is fixed now in cvs. JF Mertens --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] lynx-ssl-2.8.4-24

2004-11-07 Thread jfm
On Nov 7, 2004, at 10:22 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: jfm wrote: [] fink remove gd2; fink install lynx-ssl; fink install gd2 This could also be achieved by BuildConflicts: gd2. Martin : this was a fix suggested to the user ; do you really mean better to suggest him to edit the info file ??? Jean

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] lynx-ssl-2.8.4-24

2004-11-07 Thread jfm
On Nov 7, 2004, at 11:22 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: On Nov 7, 2004, at 10:22 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: This could also be achieved by BuildConflicts: gd2. No, I meant it as an alternative to the fix you put in in the meantime. That's why I answered only to the devel list. With sf distributing

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] lynx-ssl-2.8.4-24

2004-11-06 Thread jfm
On Nov 7, 2004, at 12:36 AM, Ersatz Sophist wrote: I can't compile this package. For the third time, the following error is obtained: LYCharSets.c: In function `HTMLGetEntityUCValue': LYCharSets.c:878: error: `unicode_entities' undeclared (first use in this function) LYCharSets.c:878: error:

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] lynx-ssl-2.8.4-24

2004-11-06 Thread jfm
Hi Dan, On Nov 7, 2004, at 1:44 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: Should we add -I./chrtrans to lynx Makefile somewhere or add it to CPPFLAGS in the .info? I fixed the info file already. [ +NoSetCPPFLAGS: true +CompileScript: export CPATH=%p/include ; ./configure %c ; make ] Best, JF

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/crypto/finkinfo lynx-ssl.info,1.2,1.3

2004-11-06 Thread jfm
On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:29 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: Is this really correct? - --libdir=%p/etc No idea what it does. But the linking seems correct : /sw/var/logs# grep ' \-L' lynx-ssl.log checking whether the C compiler (gcc -L/sw/lib) works... yes checking whether the C compiler (gcc -L/sw/lib)

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/crypto/finkinfo lynx-ssl.info,1.2,1.3

2004-11-06 Thread jfm
On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:37 AM, jfm wrote: On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:29 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: Is this really correct? - --libdir=%p/etc No idea what it does. From dpkg -L lynx-ssl, I would guess that lynx.cfg goes by default in libdir ... JF

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/crypto/finkinfo lynx-ssl.info,1.2,1.3

2004-11-06 Thread jfm
On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:41 AM, jfm wrote: On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:29 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: Is this really correct? - --libdir=%p/etc No idea what it does. From dpkg -L lynx-ssl, I would guess that lynx.cfg goes by default in libdir ... Right _ cf DescDetail ... (and sorry for needing 3 replies

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/crypto/finkinfo lynx-ssl.info,1.2,1.3

2004-11-06 Thread jfm
On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:41 AM, jfm wrote: On Nov 7, 2004, at 2:29 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: Is this really correct? - --libdir=%p/etc No idea what it does. From dpkg -L lynx-ssl, I would guess that lynx.cfg goes by default in libdir ... Right _ cf DescDetail ... (and sorry for needing 3 replies

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Unstable Octave compile fails

2004-08-21 Thread jfm
On Aug 21, 2004, at 9:35 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Martin Costabel wrote: wrote: [] ld: Undefined symbols: Arraydouble::transpose() const [] Failed: compiling octave-2.1.57-3 failed Paul, I think I have narrowed this down to a difference between the compilers from Xcode-1.2 and from Xcode-1.5.

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Unstable Octave compile fails

2004-08-21 Thread jfm
On Aug 22, 2004, at 1:27 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: On Aug 21, 2004, at 7:08 PM, jfm wrote: Martin, Yes _ I can confirm that (apparently) the same problem arose here, as I already mentioned to you, with the sequence singular-factory singular-libfac macaulay2 (build 1666 of /usr/libexec/gcc

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Unstable Octave compile fails

2004-08-21 Thread jfm
On Aug 22, 2004, at 1:08 AM, jfm wrote: Yes _ I can confirm that (apparently) the same problem arose here, as I already mentioned to you, with the sequence singular-factory singular-libfac macaulay2 (build 1666 of /usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/ppc/3.3/cc1plus), and that it disappears with your build

[Fink-devel] percent expansions in Files fields

2004-08-16 Thread jfm
Hi, Trying to update after holidays, libpng3 doesn't build _ with fink HEAD from today : /bin/mv /sw/src/root-libpng3-1.2.6-5/sw/lib/libpng12.0.%vrc5.dylib /sw/src/root-libpng3-shlibs-1.2.6-5/sw/lib/ mv: rename /sw/src/root-libpng3-1.2.6-5/sw/lib/libpng12.0.%vrc5.dylib to

Re: [Fink-devel] Implied Perl dependency tree following or what am I missing?

2004-07-24 Thread jfm
On Jul 23, 2004, at 11:57 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: David H. wrote: fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The candidates: (1) io-stringy-pm560: Perl module for advanced I/O with filehandles Since I wish to install soap-lite-ssl for Perl 5.8.1 and it seems to be a

Re: [Fink-devel] Implied Perl dependency tree following or what am I missing?

2004-07-24 Thread jfm
On Jul 24, 2004, at 7:04 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Please consult the packaging manual. It is no longer permitted to have a placeholder -pm package which depends on versioned packages. The only exception is storable-pm, because of the historical way it is used during bootstrapping. Whoever

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Errors in percent expansions (Modified by jfm)

2004-07-20 Thread jfm
Thanks a lot for %a working again ! On Jul 19, 2004, at 8:20 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: An idea that has been kicked around on #fink and is a Features tracker request is MD5 for patchfiles. This is for end-user convenience (avoid getting .info and .patch out-of-sync if pulling random CVS revisions)

[Fink-devel] Re: Errors in percent expansions (Modified by jfm)

2004-07-19 Thread jfm
Hi Daniel, I see your log msg 'Restrict use of %a to PatchScript.' from this morning. So the msg below should have gone to you... (Is there a real need for this restriction?) Best, JF On Jul 18, 2004, at 4:27 PM, jfm wrote: Hi, Using fink HEAD : Trying to build postgresql74-ssl-7.4.3-25 leads

Re: [Fink-devel] gabber-ssl/dia scrollkeeper conflict

2004-07-15 Thread jfm
On Jul 14, 2004, at 8:55 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: ---(snip!)--- Preparing to replace dia 0.92-12 (using .../dia_0.93-2_darwin-powerpc.deb) ... Unpacking replacement dia ... dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/graphics/dia_0.93 -2_darwin-powerpc.deb

[Fink-devel] /sw/bin/perl

2004-06-23 Thread jfm
Hi, The following is the latest example _ but I had this on numerous occasions : ___attempted build of arts-latest /var/tmp/tmp.1.LaILav the following environment is being used: ACLOCALFLAGS: -I libltdl CFLAGS: -Os -fPIC CPPFLAGS: -I/sw/lib/flex/include

[Fink-devel] Re: /sw/bin/perl

2004-06-23 Thread jfm
On Jun 23, 2004, at 10:54 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Jean-Francois, I'm not sure if it's the same error you are seeing, but one bug I am aware of is this: there is a place in the fink code where fink tests to see which is the current version of perl installed on the system... unfortnately,

[Fink-devel] Re: /sw/bin/perl

2004-06-23 Thread jfm
On Jun 23, 2004, at 10:51 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: you end up with a *real* perl581, but a *virtual* perl581-core, and get this error. Well, that can't be the right explanation, because there isn't a real perl581 package at all. Correct . It is due to the fact that a number of pkgs install

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: /sw/bin/perl

2004-06-23 Thread jfm
On Jun 23, 2004, at 10:57 PM, jfm wrote: It is due to the fact that a number of pkgs install scripts beginning with #!/currently/active/perl More accurately probably, #! `which perl` Cf all 'checking for perl... /sw/bin/perl' in log files JF

Re: [Fink-devel] proposed policy on BuildDependsOnly

2004-06-21 Thread jfm
Dear Dave, This proposal looks perfect to me. As to Peter's reservation, couldn't that be met with his suggestion of BuildDependsOnly: false or a variant ? On Jun 21, 2004, at 2:54 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: (It is possible that in future versions of fink, this warning will be expanded to cover

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging question

2004-06-19 Thread jfm
On Jun 19, 2004, at 1:13 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote: CompileScript: cd src/ make This gives the following error: cd src/ Can't exec cd: No such file or directory at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm line 403. The CompileScript is executed 'line by line'. Thus either use :

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: readline-4.3-26

2004-05-08 Thread jfm
On May 8, 2004, at 3:06 AM, Ben Hines wrote: On May 7, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Ben Hines wrote: That did not happen to me. Perhaps it will only occur with programs which do not use ncurses, but which do use readline? Which programs ? The 2 cases were from a local program, that linked both readline and

Re: [Fink-devel] XCode 1.2 issue with tcltk?

2004-05-05 Thread jfm
I don't think this is due to XCode1.2 : my tcltk was re-built here with XCode1.2 (apr. 26), and I got there : ../macosx/tclMacOSXBundle.c: In function `Tcl_MacOSXOpenVersionedBundleResources': ../macosx/tclMacOSXBundle.c:152: warning: passing arg 4 of `CFURLCreateCopyAppendingPathComponent' with

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-devel] SGMLSpm-1.03ii.tar.gz failed to compile (Modifié par Michèle Garoche)

2004-04-12 Thread jfm
On Apr 12, 2004, at 6:01 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote: Sorry, redirected from fink-users (sent on fink-users by error). Michele _ you can pick up a fixed file on cvs. Hopefully it works now on HFS+ _ please test ! Jean-Francois --- This SF.Net

[Fink-devel] bluefish

2004-04-08 Thread jfm
Hi Michele, In the Source field, 'downloads' should be replaced by 'snapshots' (wondering how Martin managed to build it already w/o hitting this.. did you already have the src ?) The build went well, except for the overwrite of the the prev version at the end. Jean-Francois

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Incorrect ConfigureParams in zsh-4.2.0

2004-03-27 Thread jfm
On Mar 27, 2004, at 10:39 PM, David H. wrote: Gary Kerbaugh wrote: As far as whether or not to include it with zsh, I have to defer to your experience. As I think about it, it does seem easier to make it a separate package. The zsh-script.info should be pretty easy and I could alter the

[Fink-devel] Re: Incorrect ConfigureParams in zsh-4.2.0

2004-03-27 Thread jfm
David H. dmalloc at users.sourceforge.net writes: jfm wrote: Or Suggest or Recommend ? _ no need to Depend it would seem to me Suggest and Recommend does not work for source installs, fink ignores those fields. If those scripts really do improve the whole zsh experience a LOT

Re: [Fink-devel] /sw/man and dante

2004-03-26 Thread jfm
On Mar 26, 2004, at 6:28 PM, David H. wrote: jfm wrote: I don't know to which of your above pkgs you're referring here : ccrypt or xmlsec ? (apparently not sudo since that's not yet in 10.3). But for both I was referring to the 10.3 version. ccrypt is fine, just checked it. I am fixing xmlsec

[Fink-devel] ccrypt

2004-03-26 Thread jfm
Hi David _ Changing mandir -ConfigureParams: --prefix=%p --mandir=%p/share/man +ConfigureParams: --prefix=%p --mandir=%i/share/man will not change : mkdir /sw/src/root-ccrypt-1.6-12/sw/doc mkdir /sw/src/root-ccrypt-1.6-12/sw/doc/ccrypt /sw/bin/install -c -m 644 ./ccrypt.html

[Fink-devel] fink-cvs

2004-03-18 Thread jfm
Hi Dan, Since today's update to fink, I also get msgs : Failed: Can't resolve dependency libsoup-ssl-shlibs (= 1.99.28-3) for package libsoup-ssl-1.99.28-3 (no matching packages/versions found) Failed: Can't resolve dependency gal199-shlibs (= 1.99.11-6) for package gal199-1.99.11-6 (no

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-cvs

2004-03-18 Thread jfm
Hi Dan, Trying a bit more : fink list -o Information about 3532 packages read in 15 seconds. Use of uninitialized value in exists at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Status.pm line 153. Use of uninitialized value in exists at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/VirtPackage.pm line 472. ... repeats I omit the

[Fink-devel] failed du_sk-tests in making fink-0.19.2.cvs-20040317

2004-03-17 Thread jfm
Hi, I have no idea what causes this _ UFS shouldn't matter here, no ? ./Command/du_sk..NOK 5# Failed test (./Command/du_sk.t at line 30) # got: '83' # expected: '103' ./Command/du_sk..NOK 6# Failed test (./Command/du_sk.t at line 31) # got:

[Fink-devel] Re: failed du_sk-tests in making fink-0.19.2.cvs-20040317

2004-03-17 Thread jfm
Hi, Here is the explanation I guess : /sw/fink/cvs/fink/t/Command# /usr/bin/du . 10 ./CVS 38 . /sw/fink/cvs/fink/t/Command# /sw/bin/du . 5 ./CVS 19 . Jean-Francois --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux

Re: [Fink-devel] failed du_sk-tests in making fink-0.19.2.cvs-20040317

2004-03-17 Thread jfm
On Mar 17, 2004, at 6:36 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: It seems this answers part of the mystery: [Toaster:/Volumes/TestUFS/fink/t] vasi$ du -sk . 94 . [Toaster:/Volumes/TestUFS/fink/t] vasi$ perl -MFink::Command=du_sk -e 'print(du_sk($_),\n) for @ARGV' . 73 [Toaster:/Volumes/TestUFS/fink/t]

Re: [Fink-devel] BuildDependsOnly warnings

2004-03-13 Thread jfm
On Mar 13, 2004, at 12:19 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: I thought that Dan had fixed all those by changing the .info files to use here-doc format? Perhaps he only did the 10.3 tree? On Mar 13, 2004, at 12:29 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: I'm pretty sure that's been fixed in all of 10.2-gcc3.3 and 10.3

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-forge-2004.02.12-1

2004-03-09 Thread jfm
On Mar 8, 2004, at 9:32 PM, Michael Kluskens wrote: fink install octave-forge gives: ld: can't locate file for: -lqhull Thanks for the reminder _ the issue came up already before. Fixed in cvs. (if you can't wait, just add in the info file a line SetLIBRARY_PATH: %p/lib ) JF Mertens

Re: [Fink-devel] pango and freetype question

2004-02-26 Thread jfm
On Feb 26, 2004, at 2:02 AM, James Gibbs wrote: Could someone look at the following snippet from the compilation of pango1-xft2 and tell me if it looks wrong to them, too. Specifically, in the last call to gcc, -L/sw/lib comes before -L/usr/X11R6/lib and there is also a -lfreetype. Wouldn't

Re: [Fink-devel] date-manip-pm error

2004-02-17 Thread jfm
On Feb 16, 2004, at 3:19 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 01:40:24AM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: One (minor) question in this context is how the package database determines the maintainer when different versions of a package have different maintainers. From looking at examples it

Re: [Fink-devel] date-manip-pm error

2004-02-17 Thread jfm
On Feb 17, 2004, at 7:04 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Trees line. 'fink info'. Huh? We're talking about http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/index.php Very sorry _ I thought of fink's package db... JF --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your

Re: [Fink-devel] Packaging policy

2004-02-17 Thread jfm
On Feb 13, 2004, at 8:48 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: On Feb 13, 2004, at 9:15 AM, jfm wrote: Similarly, to get the set of pkgs that eg still depend on gd a simple egrep -rI '[, ]gd([, ]|$)' /sw/fink/dists/unstable|grep 'Depends:' suffices with the 1 line convention. (And as long as only a dozen pkgs

Re: [Fink-devel] Packaging policy

2004-02-13 Thread jfm
On Feb 13, 2004, at 9:39 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote: I prefer the here-doc structure for Depends and BuildDepends in fink packages, where each dependency (with possible alternatives) is on a separate line. For example Depends: x11, giflib-shlibs | libungif-shlibs IMO this is much more

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods getopt-long-pm.info,1.1,1.2 getopt-long-pm581.info,1.1,1.2

2004-02-03 Thread jfm
On Feb 3, 2004, at 5:44 PM, TheSin wrote: the point is still why? it's not hurting fink or dpkg for our usage. Even if it doesn't hurt fink's or dpkg's current usage (no guarantee about future versions of dpkg), users must be able to rely on the specs for whatever scripts they need.

Re: .app's in Fink (was Re: [Fink-devel] CFD: Installing Frameworks from fink packages)

2004-01-27 Thread jfm
On Jan 27, 2004, at 12:24 AM, Darian Lanx wrote: What happens to the maitainer precedence then? Will the native app always be preffered? Why would anyone want to use KDE/X11 when they can have native KDE? To me, the crucial point is that all X11 based stuff, as well as the command line stuff,

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
When updating fink from cvs an hour ago, I got : ln -s 10.3 /sw/fink/dists Reading package info... Error performing percent expansion: unknown % expansion or nesting too deep: %n-dev. at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm line 549. And any command like 'fink rebuild foo' yields the same msg.

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
On Jan 16, 2004, at 5:17 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:47:34PM +0100, jfm wrote: When updating fink from cvs an hour ago, I got : ln -s 10.3 /sw/fink/dists Reading package info... Error performing percent expansion: unknown % expansion or nesting too deep: %n-dev. at /sw/lib

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
On Jan 16, 2004, at 5:17 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: adjusted those .info in 10.3 in CVS Wednesday night. For me: % grep -lr /sw/fink/10.3 '%n-dev' Even in 10.3 I still find , in unstable: libs/ggz-client-libs.info:BuildDepends: %n-dev (= %v-%r) games/ggz-server.info:BuildDepends: %n-dev (= %v-%r)

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
On Jan 16, 2004, at 6:10 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Remi adjusted all of 10.2-gcc3.3 and most of 10.2 yesterday, and I did the remainder of 10.2 this morning. Thanks for fixing ivtools in 10.2 _ that did it. For those playing along at home: ... Thanks also for the nice explanation. Best,

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.523,1.524 Package.pm,1.58,1.59 PkgVersion.pm,1.213,1.214

2004-01-16 Thread jfm
On Jan 16, 2004, at 6:27 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: libs/ggz-client-libs.info:BuildDepends: %n-dev (= %v-%r) games/ggz-server.info:BuildDepends: %n-dev (= %v-%r) (what a strange construct _ again a pkg that BuildDepends on self ?) I guess that -dev could be in a different .info or something so it's

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [gnome-core] librsvg2-2.4.0-3

2004-01-14 Thread jfm
On Jan 14, 2004, at 6:31 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: The real fix would be to lean on the freetype2 guys to make them fix the upstream sources. Why for god's sake did they have to put a freetype directory inside include/freetype2? This header file should be named freetype2/freetype.h. Hi

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods compress-zlib-pm.info,NONE,1.1 compress-zlib-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 dbd-mysql-pm.info,NONE,1.1 dbd-mysql-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 dbi-pm.info,NONE,1.1 dbi-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 html-parser-pm.info,NONE,1.1 html-parser-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 mime-base64-pm.info,NONE,1.1 mime-base64-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 scalar-list-utils-pm.info,NONE,1.1 scalar-list-utils-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 template-notex-pm.info,NONE,1.1 template-notex-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 template-pm.info,NONE,1.1 template-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 term-readkey-pm-2.21-6.info,NONE,1.1 term-readkey-pm581-2.21-1.info,NONE,1.1 text-iconv-pm.info,NONE,1.1 text-iconv-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm560.info,NONE,1.1 time-hires-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 unicode-string-pm.info,NONE,1.1 unicode-string-pm581.info,NONE,1.1 xml-parser-pm.info,NONE,1.1 xml-parser-pm581.info,NONE,1.1

2004-01-09 Thread jfm
Hi Dave, But Dan's excerpts showed --- NEW FILE: template-notex-pm581.info --- Package: template-notex-pm581 Depends: appconfig-pm, perl580-core BuildDepends: fink (= 0.13.0-1), perl580-core those '580' should presumably be 581 ... (Also the Suggests line has a couple of stray 580's) And the

Re: [Fink-devel] fink builds twice

2004-01-06 Thread jfm
On Jan 6, 2004, at 12:05 PM, Max Horn wrote: After all, relatives of a package can't (and mustn't) be build dependencies of the package, since they are built at *exactly the same time*. So it wouldn't even make sense to have such a dependency (I can imagine some situations where people would

Re: [Fink-devel] fink builds twice

2004-01-06 Thread jfm
problem _ and the other(s) ? and not fink it's self, I disagree about ffmpeg, I think it is right. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 6-Jan-04, at 8:04 AM, jfm wrote: Don't worry _ it'll work out, and has to be this way. Justin _ can you

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Ruby test failed

2003-12-23 Thread jfm
On Dec 23, 2003, at 6:24 PM, Matthias Neeracher wrote: Interesting, and thank you so much for testing this! This looks like you're running the test without having installed the ruby-support patch itself, I just ran inject.pl ... which applies to the perlmods (Fink::PkgVersion, to be more

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Ruby test failed

2003-12-23 Thread jfm
On Dec 23, 2003, at 8:19 PM, jfm wrote: This looks like you're running the test without having installed the ruby-support patch itself, I just ran inject.pl ... But I see the cvs update command had the '-f' option (together with -r HEAD). JF

Re: [Fink-devel] new fink commands

2003-12-15 Thread jfm
Opinions seems to me to go a bit too much in one single direction on this _ so let me try to play the devil's advocate.. On Dec 9, 2003, at 11:44 PM, Max Horn wrote: Am Dienstag, 09.12.03 um 21:56 Uhr schrieb TheSin: netpbm10 has 2 children: - netpbm10-shlibs - netpbm-bin so

Re: [Fink-devel] The perl modules situation

2003-12-15 Thread jfm
On Dec 15, 2003, at 8:39 AM, Patrick Näf wrote: jfm said: Typically perl580 (eg) will install the same man pages, at the same place. So in order for the user not to have to force-overwrites , yes, you need such a Replaces (and perl580 too) _ if this is the case with your package. Ah, I see

Re: [Fink-devel] The perl modules situation

2003-12-14 Thread jfm
On Dec 14, 2003, at 12:38 AM, Patrick Näf wrote: I'm the owner of one of the modules which is provided by perl580 (text-tabs-wrap-pm). When JFM brought this up back in August he suggested that, appropriate 'Replaces' fields be put in those packages, and in perl580. JFMs suggestion can't

Re: [Fink-devel] new fink commands

2003-12-09 Thread jfm
On Dec 9, 2003, at 7:45 AM, D. Höhn wrote: There can be many children but only _one_ parent. Is that correct? netpbm-bin has as parents both netpbm and netpbm10 _ and there may be a couple more such examples. Jean-Francois --- This SF.net

Re: [Fink-devel] Trees not searched in order?

2003-12-09 Thread jfm
On Dec 9, 2003, at 5:25 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Why isn't the order of Trees important? This has annoyed me, too. I seem to remember someone saying that it is now, since one of the recent shakeups, Not that recent : the introduction of 'fink index' the *reverse*

[Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread jfm
Hi, Just updated fink, and now : ... dpkg-deb: building package `cups-dev' in `/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/cups- dev_1.1.20-0.rc1.1_darwin-powerpc.deb'. /bin/ln -sf /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/cups-

Re: [Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread jfm
On Dec 4, 2003, at 5:54 PM, TheSin wrote: try current HEAD now. Also if you know of a build that needs to switch db3 and db4 a few times or something like that could you test it or tell me :P Trying ; fink gets rebuild twice : ... All tests successful. Files=21, Tests=492, 56 wallclock secs

Re: [Fink-devel] fink HEAD builds everything twice

2003-12-04 Thread jfm
On Dec 4, 2003, at 6:47 PM, jfm wrote: Trying ; fink gets rebuild twice : PS: I read : But I think this is the end of the road for my changes, as I'm upsetting ppl now I'd be sorry about that. My msgs didn't imply at all I was upset _ on the contrary. On ne fait pas d'omellette sans casser des

[Fink-devel] Re: bladeenc

2003-11-29 Thread jfm
Hi, I get in my logs : The following package will be rebuilt: bladeenc Failed: Can't use an undefined value as a HASH reference at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm line 271. I guess it is the * in the TarFilesRename: BladeEnc.* The use of wildcards is explicitly allowed in the docs though. JF

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Installing librep-dev-0.16.2-11 failed

2003-11-27 Thread jfm
On Nov 27, 2003, at 11:20 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: David Orlovich wrote: snip - Trying to install rep.m4 in /sw/src/root-librep-0.16.2-11/usr/share/aclocal; if this fails, install it manually in a suitable location

[Fink-devel] parsing errors with ConfFiles

2003-11-21 Thread jfm
Hi, Since today I get errors of the style : dpkg-deb -b root-leafnode-1.9.46-1 /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/net warning, conffile name `/sw/etc/leafnode/config...' is too long, or missing final newline dpkg-deb: ignoring 1 warnings about the control file(s) ... dpkg:

Re: [Fink-devel] parsing errors with ConfFiles

2003-11-21 Thread jfm
On Nov 21, 2003, at 6:01 PM, TheSin wrote: can you paste the /sw/src/root-leafnode-1.9.46-1/DEBIAN/CONTROL file please. The 'control' file is perfect (cf below if you want). But the 'conffiles' file has indeed no final newline. Best, JF Package: leafnode Source: leafnode Version: 1.9.46-1

Re: [Fink-devel] parsing errors with ConfFiles

2003-11-21 Thread jfm
On Nov 21, 2003, at 6:26 PM, TheSin wrote: hmmm how odd, so the error is in the conffiles file, and you say any pkg with a conffile line will produce this? Right (tested just one other, plus variations on this one) Didn't check pkgs with multiline ConfFiles fields. JF

Re: [Fink-devel] parsing errors with ConfFiles

2003-11-21 Thread jfm
On Nov 21, 2003, at 7:39 PM, TheSin wrote: the fix is now in fink cvs...thanks And works perfectly. How efficient, Justin ! Thanks a lot JF --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more

[Fink-devel] -fast flag ?

2003-11-20 Thread jfm
Hi, I see packages coming up in 10.3 that set the '-fast' flag _ eg, agrep, in the patch (after correcting 644 to 755 in the first install command and fixing the second...) My understanding is that some mechanism would then be needed in fink to automatically add the appropriate -mcpu and -mtune

Re: [Fink-devel] About perl modules (was: Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.405,1.406 PkgVersion.pm,1.169,1.170)

2003-11-14 Thread jfm
Things seem to work perfectly now. Thanks a lot Dave for this very clarifying msg. On Nov 14, 2003, at 2:30 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: ... The scheme was disrupted somewhat when Apple compiled perl 5.8.1 for 10.3 with a different architecture flag. So for Type: perl 5.8.1 we now need

Re: [Fink-devel] package manager release

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
On Nov 12, 2003, at 10:05 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: I plan to release version 0.17.0 of the package manager from CVS HEAD around 24 hours from now. Also, if anyone is aware of things in HEAD which are inappropriate for the next release, please let me know ASAP. Since before ~nov 5, the

[Fink-devel] Re: UpdatePOD

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
On Nov 13, 2003, at 6:47 PM, TheSin wrote: I'll look at the code. but it might expect perllocal.pod to be at a certain location and it might not be there? Yes _ eg in the log of rec-descent-pm : /bin/cat /sw/src/root-rec-descent-pm-1.80-5/sw/lib/perl5/5.8.1/darwin-thread-

[Fink-devel] Re: UpdatePOD

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
On Nov 13, 2003, at 7:18 PM, TheSin wrote: ahh the arch dir is killing it, do you still have the build dir...or main root dir if so can you tell me where the perllocal.pod file resides in a 581 pkg pleasE? On 13-Nov-03, at 10:56 AM, jfm wrote: /bin/cat /sw/src/root-rec-descent-pm-1.80-5

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: UpdatePOD

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
On Nov 13, 2003, at 7:21 PM, jfm wrote: Rebuilding it now _ but the error msg basically tells it: dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/33/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/perlmods/rec- descent-pm_1.80-5_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install): trying to overwrite `/sw/lib/perl5/darwin/perllocal.pod

Fwd: [Fink-devel] package manager release

2003-11-13 Thread jfm
Sorry _ bounced. Retrying .. JF Begin forwarded message: Resent-From: jfm [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: jfm [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: November 13, 2003 6:12:10 PM CET Resent-To: David R. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED], Justin Hallett [EMAIL PROTECTED], Fink devel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TheSin [EMAIL

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Dependency of dpkg on perl580

2003-11-02 Thread jfm
On Oct 29, 2003, at 7:39 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: My guess is that what happens is this: the configure script for some package runs which perl and then uses the answer to decide what to write in the perl scripts for that package. dpkg must be one of the things affected by this. Sure _

[Fink-devel] Dependency of dpkg on perl580

2003-10-29 Thread jfm
Hi, After installing panther and Xcode, I removed perl580 _ not perl580-core. (A force-depends was needed only for apache-dbi-pm). But when installing other packages, one gets then: /sw/sbin/install-info: /sw/bin/perl: bad interpreter: No such file or directory /sw/sbin/update-alternatives:

[Fink-devel] Re: Dependency of dpkg on perl580

2003-10-29 Thread jfm
On Oct 29, 2003, at 6:22 PM, jfm wrote: /sw/sbin/install-info: /sw/bin/perl: bad interpreter: No such file or directory /sw/sbin/update-alternatives: /sw/bin/perl: bad interpreter: No such file or directory ~# grep '/sw/bin/perl' /sw/sbin/install-info /sw/sbin/update-alternatives /sw/sbin

Re: [Fink-devel] Please confirm these md5 sums

2003-09-01 Thread jfm
After re-fetching cyclo, ckermit and gkermit the 3 FAILED disappeared. Jean-Francois --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Please confirm these md5 sums

2003-09-01 Thread jfm
I get _ with 'md5sum -c' : /sw/src/110.42-README OK /sw/src/110.42-cml-faq.html OK /sw/src/AfterStep-1.8.11.tar.bz2 md5sum: can't open /sw/src/AfterStep-1.8.11.tar.bz2 /sw/src/F2PY-2.32.225-1419.tar.gz OK /sw/src/Filter-Simple-0.77.tar.gz OK /sw/src/FreezeThaw-0.43.tar.gzOK

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dbi-pm580 fails test

2003-07-30 Thread jfm
On Wednesday, Jul 30, 2003, at 03:54 Europe/Brussels, Koen van der Drift wrote: On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 08:32 AM, jfm wrote: Problem might be in the perl installation. I seem to find most of those symbols in /System/Library/Perl/darwin/CORE/libperl.dylib and NOT in /sw/lib/perl5/5.8.0

[Fink-devel] Re: dbi-pm580 fails test

2003-07-29 Thread jfm
On Tuesday, Jul 29, 2003, at 11:00 Europe/Brussels, Christian Schaffner wrote: Hi Koen Thanks for the feedback. On Dienstag, Juli 29, 2003, at 04:26 Uhr, Koen van der Drift wrote: Hi, I tried to install dbi-pm580 and got the following error (+ many similar ones) during the test-phase:

Re: [Fink-devel] pm dependencies

2003-07-28 Thread jfm
On Monday, Jul 28, 2003, at 12:18 Europe/Brussels, Daniel Macks wrote: I'm not sure I understand, so this paragraph could be irrelevant, but... That sounds like it would mean that every perl I have would have the same modules installed. That might be nice in that no matter which perl I used,

Re: [Fink-devel] pm dependencies

2003-07-25 Thread jfm
On Friday, Jul 25, 2003, at 14:46 Europe/Brussels, David R. Morrison wrote: Hi. This is indeed a tricky problem. Ideally, people might want to have several different versions of the perl-core packages installed, and might want the ability to easily switch back and forth among them. So I am

Re: [Fink-devel] pm dependencies

2003-07-25 Thread jfm
On Friday, Jul 25, 2003, at 15:22 Europe/Brussels, jfm wrote: With those, switching back to a previously used version is just doing fink install perlxyz _ the corresponding -not package gets automatically moved out of the way as a conflict, and nothing else has to be done since the deps of all

[Fink-devel] pm dependencies

2003-07-24 Thread jfm
There is, if I'm not mistaken, a problem of correct deps for a multi-perl fink installation. Recall that some pm's (roughly, those installing a bundle) must have Type: Perl x.y.z in their info file, and be built with perlx.y.z, to be usable with perlx.y.z _ and those packages get a name like

Re: [Fink-devel] openldap-ssl-shlibs-2.1.22-1 incompatible with cyrus-sasl2-shlibs-2.1.15-1 ?

2003-07-23 Thread jfm
On Wednesday, Jul 23, 2003, at 11:00 Europe/Brussels, Christian Schaffner wrote: checking for sasl/sasl.h... yes checking for sasl.h... no checking for sasl_client_init in -lsasl2... no checking for sasl_client_init in -lsasl... no configure: error: Could not locate Cyrus SASL ### execution of

Re: [Fink-devel] proposed fix for as problem

2003-07-14 Thread jfm
On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 19:11 Europe/Brussels, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Since the broken assembler in the Dec2002 Dev Tools update seems only to affect g77, I propose to implement this fix: 1) create an as package, which builds an assembler from opendarwin cvs (that actually works with g77).

Re: [Fink-devel] g77 error

2003-07-11 Thread jfm
On Friday, Jul 11, 2003, at 18:58 Europe/Brussels, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is an error I have gotten with either g77 3.1 or 3.3 if you upgrade to the developer tools patch that installs gcc 3.3. The only way I was able to get rid of this problem was to reinstall the December 2002

Re: [Fink-devel] assembler and perl modules

2003-07-07 Thread jfm
On Saturday, Jul 5, 2003, at 21:34 Europe/Brussels, David R. Morrison wrote: You can find these -pm580 packages in /experimental/jfmertens if you would like to help test. One note : The packages represent a minimal adaptation to get a usable perl580 installation (were first intended for purely

[Fink-devel] Re: New June2003 assembler broken

2003-07-01 Thread jfm
Martin Costabel wrote: If this is *only* one file in the atlas/lapack package, one can probably work around by patching this file, but since this is such an innocent file, I suspect the problem should pop up in other fortran programs as well. Compiling a pdl580 yields me: g77 -c -o

  1   2   >