Re: [Fink-devel] FAW Q1.5: Then why did you choose /sw? -- Howabout /usr/local/fink?

2003-01-10 Thread Max Horn
At 20:04 Uhr -0500 09.01.2003, Jason Deraleau wrote: My vote is for /opt/fink. Just to clarify this, there is nothing to vote on here. There are no serious reasons to abandon /sw, but many good reasons not to do it - one of them being backward compatibility, we don't want to force 99% of

Re: [Fink-devel] FAW Q1.5: Then why did you choose /sw? -- Howabout /usr/local/fink?

2003-01-09 Thread Max Horn
At 18:56 Uhr -0500 09.01.2003, Jason Deraleau wrote: [...] My vote is for /opt/fink. Just to clarify this, there is nothing to vote on here. There are no serious reasons to abandon /sw, but many good reasons not to do it - one of them being backward compatibility, we don't want to force

Re: [Fink-devel] FAW Q1.5: Then why did you choose /sw? -- Howabout /usr/local/fink?

2003-01-09 Thread Walt Bunch
If the Fink community is not interested in abandoning /sw for the sake of standards compliance (or any other reason) then perhaps the statement regarding the choice of /sw If you have a better suggestion, post it to the fink-devel mailing list should be removed from the FAQ. At 01:11 AM

Re: [Fink-devel] FAW Q1.5: Then why did you choose /sw? -- Howabout /usr/local/fink?

2003-01-09 Thread Max Horn
At 16:36 Uhr -0800 09.01.2003, Walt Bunch wrote: If the Fink community is not interested in abandoning /sw for the sake of standards compliance (or any other reason) Err... I could say some things about this standard, but I'll refrain from doing that, it's offtopic. then perhaps the