-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 4, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Tristan Thiede wrote:
I'd like to package the appscript-py python mod, but it comes with the
following license:
--
Copyright (C) 2006 HAS
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
obtaining a
I'd like to package the appscript-py python mod, but it comes with the
following license:
--
Copyright (C) 2006 HAS
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
Software), to deal in the Software without
Tristan Thiede wrote:
I'd like to package the appscript-py python mod, but it comes with the
following license:
--
Copyright (C) 2006 HAS
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
Software), to
I'd like to package the appscript-py python mod, but it comes with the
following license:
--
Copyright (C) 2006 HAS
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
Software), to deal in the Software without
Hi,
What license-type should I put in the info file for this text:
/*
* Copyright (c) Medical Research Council 1994. All rights reserved.
*
* Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute this software and its
* documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee,
provided that
*
On May 2, 2005, at 7:54 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
Hi,
What license-type should I put in the info file for this text:
/*
* Copyright (c) Medical Research Council 1994. All rights reserved.
*
* Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute this software and
its
* documentation for any
On May 2, 2005, at 7:58 PM, Alexander Strange wrote:
That looks functionally identical to the BSD license with the
advertising clause.
So what should I use, 'BSD'? I didn't see the 'advertising clause' in
the packaing docs.
thanks,
- Koen.
Hi,
I'm packing a small utility for checking symlinks. The only information
concerning copyright is '(c) Mark Lord, freely distributable'. I'm not
sure on which license type this maps best.
Thanks for your advice.
Cheers,
Remi
On Sep 24, 2004, at 2:46 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote:
Hi,
I'm packing a small utility for checking symlinks. The only
information concerning copyright is '(c) Mark Lord, freely
distributable'. I'm not sure on which license type this maps best.
Thanks for your advice.
Cheers,
Remi
On Sep 24, 2004, at 2:46 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote:
Hi,
I'm packing a small utility for checking symlinks. The only
information concerning copyright is '(c) Mark Lord, freely
distributable'. I'm not sure on which license type this maps best.
I think I would put OSI approved (which really means:
10 matches
Mail list logo
