Daniel Johnson wrote:
If you also change SetLDFLAGS: -lintl to SetLDFLAGS: -no-undefined
-lintl this package will build prebound.
Thanks for the tip. My CVS commit contained this change.
One question. I looked in the gcc.info and ld.info files for documentation on
-no-undefined and couldn't
Blair Zajac wrote:
Daniel Johnson wrote:
If you also change SetLDFLAGS: -lintl to SetLDFLAGS: -no-undefined
-lintl this package will build prebound.
Thanks for the tip. My CVS commit contained this change.
One question. I looked in the gcc.info and ld.info files for
documentation on
On Jul 5, 2004, at 5:30 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
Blair Zajac wrote:
Daniel Johnson wrote:
If you also change SetLDFLAGS: -lintl to SetLDFLAGS:
-no-undefined -lintl this package will build prebound.
Thanks for the tip. My CVS commit contained this change.
One question. I looked in the gcc.info
Daniel Johnson wrote:
Libraries have to meet several requirements to be prebound:
* all dependencies must be prebound
* must use two-level namespace
* can't have undefined symbols
Fink's prebinding support fortunately does all the hard work,
maintainers just have to meet the above requirements.
Anybody mind if I patch popt.info to add this BuildDepends?
RCS file: /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/popt.info,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 popt.info
--- libs/popt.info 17 Jun 2004 00:41:09 - 1.1
+++ libs/popt.info 4 Jul 2004 22:27:38 -
@@
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:29:23PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
Anybody mind if I patch popt.info to add this BuildDepends?
RCS file: /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/popt.info,v
--- libs/popt.info 17 Jun 2004 00:41:09 - 1.1
+++ libs/popt.info 4 Jul 2004
On Jul 4, 2004, at 6:29 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
Anybody mind if I patch popt.info to add this BuildDepends?
RCS file:
/cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/popt.info,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 popt.info
--- libs/popt.info 17 Jun 2004 00:41:09 - 1.1
+++
