Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 O0g.gch: file changed as we read it (again)

2007-03-01 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 27 Feb 2007, at 18:44, Daniel Johnson wrote: I don't know exactly why it's happening, but I have figured out some things. The file changed as we read it warning does occur sometimes with tar 1.15.1, but it always returned an exit code of 0 in such cases. It would return 1 if a fatal error

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 O0g.gch: file changed as we read it (again)

2007-03-01 Thread Daniel Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 1, 2007, at 10:20 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 27 Feb 2007, at 18:44, Daniel Johnson wrote: I don't know exactly why it's happening, but I have figured out some things. The file changed as we read it warning does occur sometimes

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 O0g.gch: file changed as we read it (again)

2007-03-01 Thread Daniel Macks
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 07:36:08AM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: Jean-Fran?ois Mertens wrote: [] (I would bet rather on the ctime than on the size _ which looks to me as an almost redundant test _, but evidence for that will disappear after your patch .. (sigh) ) I wonder why none of

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 O0g.gch: file changed as we read it (again)

2007-02-28 Thread Koen van der Drift
I am also having issues with building gcc: ... /usr/bin/install -d -m 700 /sw/src/fink.build/root-gcc4- shlibs-4.1.-20060617/sw/share/doc/gcc4-shlibs /bin/cp -r gcc/COPYING /sw/src/fink.build/root-gcc4- shlibs-4.1.-20060617/sw/share/doc/gcc4-shlibs/ /bin/cp -r gcc/COPYING.LIB

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 O0g.gch: file changed as we read it (again)

2007-02-27 Thread Daniel Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 26, 2007, at 10:52 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 27 Feb 2007, at 03:17, Jack Howarth wrote: Frankly it is insane that tar hasn't been epoched and regressed back to 1.15.1. No other software distro would allow a single critical

[Fink-devel] gcc42 O0g.gch: file changed as we read it (again)

2007-02-26 Thread William Scott
Has anyone found the cause or found some sort of work-around for gcc42 compiling failure? I get this now on every ppc machine I have access to, so I can no longer transfer deb files: Writing package script prerm... dpkg-deb -b root-gcc42-4.1.-20070221 /sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 O0g.gch: file changed as we read it (again)

2007-02-26 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
William Scott wrote: Has anyone found the cause or found some sort of work-around for gcc42 compiling failure? I get this now on every ppc machine I have access to, so I can no longer transfer deb files: Writing package script prerm... dpkg-deb -b root-gcc42-4.1.-20070221

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 O0g.gch: file changed as we read it (again)

2007-02-26 Thread William Scott
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: William Scott wrote: Has anyone found the cause or found some sort of work-around for gcc42 compiling failure? I get this now on every ppc machine I have access to, so I can no longer transfer deb files:

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 O0g.gch: file changed as we read it (again)

2007-02-26 Thread Jack Howarth
Frankly it is insane that tar hasn't been epoched and regressed back to 1.15.1. No other software distro would allow a single critical package like this to be left broken for so long. If we can rationalize leaving our dpkg at such an old version certainly we can also justify leaving tar at

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 O0g.gch: file changed as we read it (again)

2007-02-26 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 27 Feb 2007, at 03:17, Jack Howarth wrote: Frankly it is insane that tar hasn't been epoched and regressed back to 1.15.1. No other software distro would allow a single critical package like this to be left broken for so long. If we can rationalize leaving our dpkg at such an old