On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 08:39:00AM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote:
Le 24 f?vr. 2006 ? 06:26, Daniel Johnson a ?crit :
Anyway, the brand new libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001 package requires
a BuildDepends on bison. It fails to build with the system's
version. I assume the same is also true in
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 09:08, Daniel Macks a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 08:39:00AM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote:
Le 24 f?vr. 2006 ? 06:26, Daniel Johnson a ?crit :
Anyway, the brand new libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001 package requires
a BuildDepends on bison. It fails to build with the
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:21:06AM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote:
Le 24 f?vr. 2006 ? 09:08, Daniel Macks a ?crit :
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 08:39:00AM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote:
Le 24 f?vr. 2006 ? 06:26, Daniel Johnson a ?crit :
Anyway, the brand new libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001 package
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 09:53, Daniel Macks a écrit :
But seriously, we can't require of
ourselves a higher level of quality than the uptream authors
I think the contrary, if obviously a package does not work properly,
either it has not to be put in fink and bug reported to gnome, or it
has to
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:25:14AM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote:
Le 24 f?vr. 2006 ? 09:53, Daniel Macks a ?crit :
But seriously, we can't require of
ourselves a higher level of quality than the uptream authors
I think the contrary, if obviously a package does not work properly,
either it
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 11:18, Daniel Macks a écrit :
. It seems
unlikely that an upstream package would have gone through a whole
unstable branch series then a new stable series and have serious
upgrade breakage or interface incompatibilities. So if they say
it's
compatible, it's been tested by
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:26:43 -0500
Daniel Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, the brand new libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001 package requires
a BuildDepends on bison. It fails to build with the system's version.
I assume the same is also true in the other trees.
I have fink's bison installed
On 24 Feb 2006, at 14:53, Emily Jackson wrote:
gnome-print-ps2.c:43: ../libgnomeprint/gnome-font-private.h:67: error:
parse error before 'FT_Face' ../libgnomeprint/gnome-font-private.h:67:
The safe bet is to remove freetype or freetype-hinting during the build.
JF Mertens
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:22:26 +0100
Jean-François Mertens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24 Feb 2006, at 14:53, Emily Jackson wrote:
gnome-print-ps2.c:43: ../libgnomeprint/gnome-font-private.h:67:
error: parse error before
'FT_Face' ../libgnomeprint/gnome-font-private.h:67:
The safe bet
It's me again.
And no I'm not looking to take over Gnome. :-)
Anyway, the brand new libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001 package requires a
BuildDepends on bison. It fails to build with the system's version. I
assume the same is also true in the other trees.
What's the correct procedure for these
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 06:26, Daniel Johnson a écrit :
It's me again.
And no I'm not looking to take over Gnome. :-)
Anyway, the brand new libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001 package requires
a BuildDepends on bison. It fails to build with the system's
version. I assume the same is also true in the
11 matches
Mail list logo
