Re: [Fink-devel] package ordering problem

2006-02-14 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 08:41:11PM -0800, William Scott wrote: While this works, it does contaminate the version number. Another approach is to encode the pre in the revision: 0.1.0-0.pre1.1 or some such. Increment the last .1 for a new revision. This way you can keep the version pure

[Fink-devel] package ordering problem

2006-02-12 Thread William Scott
Dear Colleagues: I now realize I should have figured out the answer to this question earlier, but I did not. I have a package (coot) whose most recent version is a pre-release. As it fixes a lot of bugs, and I am in almost daily contact with the author, we decided it was in good shape

Re: [Fink-devel] package ordering problem

2006-02-12 Thread Charles Lepple
On 2/12/06, William Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dpkg --compare-versions 0.1.0-pre-1 gt 0.1.0 echo true true How about 0.1.0.0-1 ? (The other common alternative is to use an epoch, but that's pretty ugly, and you can't ever stop using them once you start. At least this way you can release

Re: [Fink-devel] package ordering problem

2006-02-12 Thread William Scott
That's great. It works, and is so simple it hurts. Thanks! On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Charles Lepple wrote: On 2/12/06, William Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dpkg --compare-versions 0.1.0-pre-1 gt 0.1.0 echo true true How about 0.1.0.0-1 ?

Re: [Fink-devel] package ordering problem

2006-02-12 Thread Daniel Johnson
On Feb 12, 2006, at 7:01 PM, William Scott wrote: That's great. It works, and is so simple it hurts. Thanks! On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Charles Lepple wrote: On 2/12/06, William Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dpkg --compare-versions 0.1.0-pre-1 gt 0.1.0 echo true true How about 0.1.0.0-1