Re: [Fink-devel] atlas-3.9.11-1

2009-07-24 Thread Alexander Hansen
I'm testing this out now. The existing package misbuilds on core2duo machines on 10.5 (32-bit) and I've got a simple test case that I can try. On Jul 23, 2009, at 11:15 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: I have uploaded test packaging for atlas-3.9.11-1 onto fink tracking. This packaging for atlas

[Fink-devel] Updated dpkg and gettext packages

2009-07-24 Thread Sjors Gielen
Hey Finkers, I didn't know which mailing list this mail was supposed to be sent to, so please respond on the right one. Also, don't be alarmed if my next e-mail comes from mailingl...@dazjorz.com instead of dazj...@dazjorz.com, I'm subscribed there but this was more convenient for me.

Re: [Fink-devel] Updated dpkg and gettext packages

2009-07-24 Thread Sjors Gielen
Op 24 jul 2009, om 16:20 heeft Martin Costabel het volgende geschreven: Sjors Gielen wrote: Hey Finkers, I didn't know which mailing list this mail was supposed to be sent to, so please respond on the right one. Also, don't be alarmed if my next e-mail comes from mailingl...@dazjorz.com

Re: [Fink-devel] Updated dpkg and gettext packages

2009-07-24 Thread Jack Howarth
Sjors, You would have an easier time getting a change like this implemented if it were compelling enough for the debian project to be building dpkg this way. They don't appear to be linking against any sort of gettext package in debian unstable... http://packages.debian.org/sid/dpkg

Re: [Fink-devel] Updated dpkg and gettext packages

2009-07-24 Thread Martin Costabel
Sjors Gielen wrote: Hey Finkers, I didn't know which mailing list this mail was supposed to be sent to, so please respond on the right one. Also, don't be alarmed if my next e-mail comes from mailingl...@dazjorz.com instead of dazj...@dazjorz.com, I'm subscribed there but this was more

Re: [Fink-devel] Updated dpkg and gettext packages

2009-07-24 Thread Sjors Gielen
Jack Howarth schreef: Sjors, You would have an easier time getting a change like this implemented if it were compelling enough for the debian project to be building dpkg this way. They don't appear to be linking against any sort of gettext package in debian unstable...

Re: [Fink-devel] atlas-3.9.11-1

2009-07-24 Thread Jack Howarth
What exactly is the misbuild on i386 darwin? Unfortunately, all of my machines are set up for x86_64 fink at the moment so it will take a bit to test that. I did notice some apparently non-fatal issues with the depreciated -mcpu option during the build. Is that what you are referring to?

Re: [Fink-devel] atlas-3.9.11-1

2009-07-24 Thread Alexander Hansen
I didn't notice it with your update so that's a good sign. The version that's in the distro right now (3.8.2-2; that's what I meant by 'existing') gets confused and decides that a core2duo machine is actually a pentium III:

Re: [Fink-devel] atlas-3.9.11-1

2009-07-24 Thread Robert Wyatt
fwiw, 3.9.11-1 builds and installs without error on my i386 MBP (10.5 32-bit). --Robert Alexander Hansen wrote: I didn't notice it with your update so that's a good sign. The version that's in the distro right now (3.8.2-2; that's what I meant by 'existing') gets confused and decides that a

Re: [Fink-devel] atlas-3.9.11-1

2009-07-24 Thread Robert Wyatt
Robert Wyatt wrote: fwiw, 3.9.11-1 builds and installs without error on my i386 MBP (10.5 32-bit). --Robert ... and now also built and installed on 10.5 PPC. -- ___

Re: [Fink-devel] atlas-3.9.11-1

2009-07-24 Thread Alexander Hansen
And, yes, that case does work. So this looks like a vast improvement over what we've got already, at least on my Macbook. For those keeping score: my test case is to install octave-atlas and to run the following three commands. A = randn(100,100); B = randn(100,1); T = A\B; If one gets a bus

[Fink-devel] [Fwd: Re: atlas-3.9.11-1]

2009-07-24 Thread Alexander Hansen
Forgot to cc-devel (and edit my post to Jack down for length--clearly not a good multitasking day for me)./ I also noted appearances of --no-cpp-precomp in the PowerPC build (not yet finished on my G4) which is a no-op now (I think as of 10.3, even). For right now it's harmless, but it might be

[Fink-devel] libsablot-1.0.3-1000

2009-07-24 Thread Jack Howarth
Dustin, The current libsablot-0.98-1024 pqckaging doesn't build on x86_64 fink due to errors of the form... sdom.cpp:1447: error: cast from 'char*' to 'int' loses precision' These don't exist in the current libsablot 1.0.3 release. I have uploaded packaging to fink tracking at...