Hello everyone,
Just thought I'd mention that I am going on holidays up the coast for
the next week, so won't be able to respond to bug reports/requests/etc
for the packages I maintain. If anyone has problems or positive
feedback, etc, for my packages, please email me, but understand that I
Greetings all,
I hope this is the right question for this list. I am attempting to
get paketto-1.0 installed on my system (once I do I will submit to
fink) my issue currently is that it is looking for libnet-config, which
should have been part of the libnet package, but it wasn't. I had some
On Friday, Nov 22, 2002, at 14:12 Europe/Brussels, Ray Slakinski wrote:
my issue currently is that it is looking for libnet-config, which
should have been part of the libnet package, but it wasn't.
I do still have /sw/etc/libnet-config on my system, presumably from on
older
version of libnet
the message I got from paketto indicated libnet-config was a binary
package, should it not be in /sw/bin? also just to confirm your
suspicion, I do not have /sw/etc/libnet-config either :)
Ray
On Friday, November 22, 2002, at 09:20 AM, jfm wrote:
On Friday, Nov 22, 2002, at 14:12
On Friday, Nov 22, 2002, at 15:37 Europe/Brussels, Ray Slakinski wrote:
the message I got from paketto indicated libnet-config was a binary
package
Not exactly _ here it is a shell script _ but with no executable flag...
But clearly it seems it should rather be in /sw/bin ...
JF Mertens
After updating gtkhtml to 1.1.6-1, I found that evolution would run, but
that the message composer would no longer work. I reverted back to
gtkhtml-1.0.2-3, and the issue was solved.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion
Ran fink selfupdate-cvs and fink update-all this morning. It wanted
to update gv but failed, as shown below. O have xaw3d installed, but
I notice that it is lower case (same if you do a fink list) Is this
causing the problem?
Any help appreciated.
-Roy M.
creating gv_user.ad
creating
Roy: Sorry about that - it works with the CVS version of the package
manager, but apparently not with the latest released version. Try fink
selupdate-cvs again, I think I fixed it.
-Jeff
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Roy Mendelssohn wrote:
Ran fink selfupdate-cvs and fink update-all this morning. It
this may be too obvious, and you would have caught it already if it were
actually the problem, but just in case, you ought to make sure that you're
using the version of emacs from fink that's in /sw/bin and not the one in
/usr/bin that distributes with darwin/osx. the latter doesn't have
Xwindows
can anybody please tell me how to get off this list?
thanks a lot
pieter
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-users mailing
This was exactly what baffled me. 'which emacs' was replying
/sw/bin/emacs that is looekd like I should have gotten the emacs21
installed by Fink. Instead what was running was always /usr/bin/emacs.
in the PATH /usr/bin was coming before /sw/bin . Fixing that (source
init.sh in .bash_profile)
Thomas, of course you are right but the problem was not even *showing*
in that 'which emacs' ALWAYS reported
/sw/bin/emacs and not /usr/bin/emacs
Does bash behave differently from (t)csh? I did not check the PATH
because /sw/bin/emacs is exactly what I wanted but still
/usr/bin/emacs was the
Massimo Marino writes:
[snip]
in the PATH /usr/bin was coming before /sw/bin . Fixing that
(source init.sh in .bash_profile) rather than into .bashrc got
the PATH right. I still do not have an answer on WHY which
emacs was reporting /sw/bin/emacs.
I had this problem after moving
Massimo Marino writes:
Does bash behave differently from (t)csh? I did not check the
PATH because /sw/bin/emacs is exactly what I wanted but still
/usr/bin/emacs was the one got called. How 'which' in bash
gets updated? any 'rehash' equivalent?
Bash doesn't have a 'which' builtin like
Thomas, of course you are right but the problem was not even *showing*
in that 'which emacs' ALWAYS reported
/sw/bin/emacs and not /usr/bin/emacs
Does bash behave differently from (t)csh? I did not check the PATH
because /sw/bin/emacs is exactly what I wanted but still
/usr/bin/emacs was the
I thought about that as I posted using which, but I thought csh was the
default shell. Not that I checked, since I use tcsh.
I don't think that bash stores and hashes the available files, and I'm not
sure which environment variable it uses to check for paths. Sorry for the
confusion and I'm happy
16 matches
Mail list logo
