[Fink-users] QT3-bin 3.0.5-9 hiding in the henhouse with QT3 3.1.1-3

2003-01-13 Thread lenny bruce
I have the "qt-mt not found" error and I noticed that my Fink has installed 3.1.1-3 version qt3, qt3-designer, qt3-dev, qt3-doc, qt3-linguist, qt3-shlibs 3.0.5-9 version qt3-bin I'm sure I did an automatic update to get this result but could this be the problem people are having with "qt-mt not

Re: [Fink-users] More system-xfree86 woes

2003-01-13 Thread Martin Costabel
Ian L. wrote: I deleted my existing xfree86 installation and installed Apple's X11. I ran "fink install system-xfree86" but received this error: --- BEGIN FINK ERROR --- dpkg -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/system-xf

[Fink-users] More system-xfree86 woes

2003-01-13 Thread Ian L.
I deleted my existing xfree86 installation and installed Apple's X11. I ran "fink install system-xfree86" but received this error: --- BEGIN FINK ERROR --- dpkg -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/system-xfree86_4.2-2_dar

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base fail (Sanjay Connare)

2003-01-13 Thread Martin Costabel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes I did, and it still does not list 4.2.1.1-4. After again running fink-selfupdate, fink update-all, fink index. I still get the following results for xfree86-base. [] xfree86-base 4.2.1.1-3 XFree86 libraries, utilities, clients Ah, you don't have t

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base fail (Sanjay Connare)

2003-01-13 Thread ATMRD
Yes I did, and it still does not list 4.2.1.1-4. After again running fink-selfupdate, fink update-all, fink index. I still get the following results for xfree86-base.  xforms-bin   1.0-3    GUI toolkit based on Xlib xforms-shlibs    1.0-3    GUI toolkit based on Xlib

Re: [Fink-users] More system-xfree86 woes

2003-01-13 Thread Kow K
Did you install both Users and SDK packages of X11? Kow On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 07:07 AM, Ian L. wrote: I deleted my existing xfree86 installation and installed Apple's X11. I ran "fink install system-xfree86" but received this error: --- BEGIN FINK ERROR

Re: [Fink-users] how to replace sources.list?

2003-01-13 Thread Martin Costabel
Michael Bovee wrote: [] So somewhere along the line I got this change in my sources.list. When I look in /sw/etc/apt I only see "sources.list.dpkg-dist" (plus an empty directory, apt.conf.d). Can I trash this file, and will a new sources.list be created automatically? Or how do I generate a new

[Fink-users] More system-xfree86 woes

2003-01-13 Thread Ian L.
I deleted my existing xfree86 installation and installed Apple's X11. I ran "fink install system-xfree86" but received this error: --- BEGIN FINK ERROR --- dpkg -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/system-xfree86_4.2-2_dar

[Fink-users] how to replace sources.list?

2003-01-13 Thread Michael Bovee
Hi Finkers, Well, my 'clue level' here is low but I think I now understand why apt-cache always crashes lately when I launch fink commander. I usually just do fink selfupdate-cvs and fink update-all and while they seem to work fine, I never seem to find any interpretable error to improve my clu

Re: [Fink-users] Evolution 1.2.1

2003-01-13 Thread Max Horn
At 13:26 Uhr -0600 13.01.2003, David Glass wrote: Has anyone attempted to compile Ximian's Evolution 1.2.1.. Just wanting a status, so I know if I should continue if someone else is not... It will come eventually, but my HD is too fully currently. -- Dav Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED] davglass.com

[Fink-users] Evolution 1.2.1

2003-01-13 Thread David Glass
Has anyone attempted to compile Ximian's Evolution 1.2.1.. Just wanting a status, so I know if I should continue if someone else is not... -- Dav Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED] davglass.com + A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without bricks tied to its head + + A Microso

Re: [Fink-users] Checking for threaded X11

2003-01-13 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 09:49 AM, Justin Walker wrote: Perhaps 'otool' will help. If the threaded libraries are distinguished by name, you can tell by looking at the output from 'otool -Lv YourBinaryHere'. ... except that they aren't distinguished by name. :) I refer you to http

Re: [Fink-users] Checking for threaded X11

2003-01-13 Thread Justin Walker
Perhaps 'otool' will help. If the threaded libraries are distinguished by name, you can tell by looking at the output from 'otool -Lv YourBinaryHere'. Regards, Justin On Monday, Jan 13, 2003, at 09:41 US/Pacific, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: That won't actually tell you if you built a package a

Re: [Fink-users] Checking for threaded X11

2003-01-13 Thread Alexander Hansen
Actually, I meant checking binaries or libraries that are on the system were built with xfree86-*-threaded installed (since I've changed from threaded to unthreaded XFree86 a few times). -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion

Re: [Fink-users] Checking for threaded X11

2003-01-13 Thread Hisashi T Fujinaka
That won't actually tell you if you built a package against a threaded version of XFree86, but only that packages could possibly depend agains t the threaded version. On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Michèle Garoche wrote: > > Le lundi, 13 jan 2003, à 17:49 Europe/Paris, Alexander Hansen a écrit : > > > Is t

Re: [Fink-users] Checking for threaded X11

2003-01-13 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le lundi, 13 jan 2003, à 17:49 Europe/Paris, Alexander Hansen a écrit : Is there a relatively easy way to check whether one built a package against a threaded version XFree86? find /sw/fink/dists/ -name \*.info | xargs grep Depends | grep threaded | more Michèle

[Fink-users] Checking for threaded X11

2003-01-13 Thread Alexander Hansen
Is there a relatively easy way to check whether one built a package against a threaded version XFree86? -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole Experiment 175 Albany Street, NW17-219 Cambridge, MA 0213