On 04/02/09 15:28, Martin Costabel wrote:
Then fink update gtk+2-shlibs. After that, building libx264-57-shlibs
should succeed.
Yup, this works. Do we have to back out this workaround when an
official fink update is committed?
Thanks,
Mike
At 11:33 AM -0500 2/5/09, Martin Costabel wrote:
drjl...@netonecom.net wrote:
Martin, your script didn't work for some reason. I got the following message:
Scanning package description files...WARNING: End of file reached
during here-document in
drjl...@netonecom.net wrote:
[]
I corrected the ^M using the HexEdit application (and verified that the
instance found and corrected of ^M was the only one in the file) but I
still got
failed to load x264.ico: Couldn't recognize the image file format for
file 'x264.ico'
However, this
Mike Zanker wrote:
[]
Do we have to back out this workaround when an
official fink update is committed?
If you use selfupdate-rsync, your modification will be overwritten. So
there is nothing to worry about.
If you use selfupdate-cvs, it is possible that a cvs conflict appears.
In this case,
Martin Costabel wrote:
drjl...@netonecom.net wrote:
[]
I corrected the ^M using the HexEdit application (and verified that the
instance found and corrected of ^M was the only one in the file) but I
still got
failed to load x264.ico: Couldn't recognize the image file format for
file
drjl...@netonecom.net wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
drjl...@netonecom.net wrote:
[]
I corrected the ^M using the HexEdit application (and verified that the
instance found and corrected of ^M was the only one in the file) but I
still got
failed to load x264.ico: Couldn't recognize the
Alexander Hansen wrote:
drjl...@netonecom.net wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
drjl...@netonecom.net wrote:
[]
I corrected the ^M using the HexEdit application (and verified that the
instance found and corrected of ^M was the only one in the file) but I
still got
failed to load
On 04/02/09 15:28, Martin Costabel wrote:
Then fink update gtk+2-shlibs. After that, building libx264-57-shlibs
should succeed.
Yup, this works. Do we have to back out this workaround when an
official fink update is committed?
Thanks,
Mike
Hi,
I'm trying to install LyX on PPC 10.4.11. The first attempt failed,
with a whole lot of lines like this near the end of the output:
make[24]: *** [/Library/Frameworks/QtDesigner.framework/QtDesigner]
Error 2
make[23]: *** [debug-all] Error 2
followed by
Building Dependency Tree...
