Ah, sorry, I didn't read your message closely enough.
I haven't tested yet with system-tetex, but if you are going to use that,
you should be sure to use a recent version of Gerben Wierda's distribution.
-- Dave
---
This SF.NET email is
On Feb 2,2003 14:55:59 +0100, Julien Salort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Yes, GW hates X11 (or did until it was officially recognized by Apple).
That's why his ghostscript is compiled without X11 support. Recompiling
gv won't help. You need a gs with X11 support. Either from Fink or,
maybe,
Jonas Steverud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David R. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yesterday saw a major new release of teTeX,
What are the benefits of this release over Gerben Wierda's release?
(Except that this is a fink package with all those benefits.) More
updated, more often
I mostly use Gerben Wierda's teTeX distribution but would like to use
fink to install some teTeX-related packages, e.g. lilypond. These
As far as I know, lilypond is the only TeX-related package in the Fink
system which insists on Fink's TeX distribution rather than Gerben
Weirda's. The
Dear Fink folks,
Yesterday saw a major new release of teTeX, and there are new Fink packages
for this release in the unstable tree. Users should be aware that upgrading
to these new packages will require the download of 80 MB of source files,
and substantial compiling time.
If you are upgrading
I've updated the new teTeX packages to version 2.0-2, repairing some of the
problems which the early testers have pointed out (either on these lists, or
privately). Thanks for helping to test!
Please note that the old bundle-tetex package is now obsolete (along with 11
other packages: carlisle,
Try the new revision of eterm which was just added to CVS (unstable tree).
-- Dave
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
What do you get from which rm?
-- Dave
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Fink-users mailing
Im very puzzled by your error message (and I had speculated that perhaps
you had some non-standard version of rm installed). The command given
is rm -R directory and the error message complains about the directory
not being empty; but the whole point of -R is that it should remove
both the
Hi Justin. The OP responded to me privately, explaining that he had
installed the fileutils package by hand, directly into /bin, so that
his /bin/rm is not the original /bin/rm. That does indeed explain
the problem.
-- Dave
---
This SF.NET
The version of system-ghostscript in Fink's unstable tree is the one you
need for ghostscript 7. If you use this successfully, please let me
know so that I can move the package to stable.
-- Dave
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
Dear Fink users,
If there is anyone out there who has ghostscript 6 installed external to
fink, and is using the system-ghostscript package to make this known to
Fink, could I ask you to do a little testing?
There is a new system-ghostscript package in the unstable tree designed
for ghostscript
Fix-fink was released about a year ago to deal with some leftover problems
with the upgrade from 10.0 to 10.1. It has not been changed since then.
However, due to some not-very-robust code (that was written by me :-)
these days it reports a potential problem even when there is no problem.
It was
The warning is confusing, because it refers to libpng, but the fix actually
has to do with the imlib package. Until amaya can be updated, you should
downgrade imlib as described on Fink's webpage.
-- Dave
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored
A very practical solution to this problem is: if you run into trouble
compiling a Fink package, try sudo mv /usr/local /usr/local.bak and
then compile the package. Afterwards, you can do sudo mv /usr/local.bak
/usr/local to restore things to their original state.
The things most likely to cause
Where can I find a policy for Fink packages?
http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/packaging/index.php
It's quite complete.
-- Dave
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2
On Jan 10,2003 22:53:01 -0600, M. Brooks Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
If I want to install openmotif instead of lesstif, how do I convince fink
packages that are dependent on lesstif should be ok with openmotif? For
example, when I try to rebuild nedit with openmotif installed, it insists on
On Jan 10,2003 12:43:16 -0500, Philip Trauring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
I have never been able to get Fink working properly with 10.2. When I
try to update packages, it updates the 10.2 tree, but when it gets to
10.2, it fails. I'm not clear on why it's still updating 10.1
anyways. I'm
Try the instructions:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/x11/inst-xfree86.php#switching-x11
-- Dave
On Jan 9,2003 19:54:16 +0100, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mich=E8le_Garoche?=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Le jeudi, 9 jan 2003, à 19:46 Europe/Paris, Alexander Hansen a écrit :
Have you tried removing
Dear Fink users,
Although not mentioned on Apple's website anyplace I can find, the ReadMe.rtf
for Apple's X11.app informs us about a mailing list devoted to Apple's X11.
You can subscribe to this list at
http://www.lists.apple.com/x11-users
Questions and comments about how to install X11.app
The newest version of system-xfree86, required for use with Apple's X11,
is now available in binary as well as source form.
Binary users should run sudo apt-get update prior to following the
instructions on Fink's website. Source users should run fink selfupdate-cvs
prior to following the
On Jan 3,2003 17:41:32 -0500, Kevin Horton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
I'm running the fink source distribution, updated from CVS, on a Mac
with OS X 10.1.5. Sometime in December I did a fink selfupdate, and
I ended up with fink 0.5.0a. Now that the upgrade matrix has been
updated, I see that
On Jan 2,2003 18:23:19 -0500, Benjamin Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:17, Martin Costabel wrote:
The fact that all qt3 splitoffs are BuildDependsOnly: true is probably
only a copy-n-pasto.
Yeah. I'll have to clean that up.
What gives me trouble is that the
Yes, you can use the December Developer Tools with Fink.
You'll get an occasional warning about weak libraries not built with
OSX_DEPLOYMENT set to 10.1 (or something like that). You can ignore
these warnings -- eventually there will be a FAQ about this.
-- Dave
Eric Salathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
An update was posted prematurely -- it turned out to be unusable to
your existing user base. The web page and README persist in referencing
misleading material and in suggesting there is a usable update. Really
now, does the comment shortcomings
I'm not sure what kind of automated testing you have in mind.
Of course, a Fink developer who commits a package to CVS has checked that
it compiles on his/her own machine. There are several levels of further
testing that can be imagined:
Question 1: Are there hidden dependencies... things
Yes, ideally the way we should build the binary distribution is to uninstall
everything before each run -- that would help to detect dependency problems.
The 0.4.1 and 0.5.0 distributions were each built by a single person (me)
running on a G4 iMac, and I simply didn't have (or take) the time to
On Dec 16,2002 20:21:00 +0100, Matthias Troyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Hi,
Does anybody know what the status of the system-xtools package is? I
can't find it under release 0.5 and need it, since I have XTools
installed on my max and Not XFree86.
Matthiass
None of the Fink developers is
I write in response to the user who complained about the premature release
of 0.5.0a, with a question for other Fink users to help guide the Fink team
in future decision-making.
Should we have pulled the distribution when we realized that there was
trouble with the upgrade matrix? Or is the note
I don't think that the error is in the .cshrc. I think it is in the
/sw/bin/init.csh since this is what is being sourced by .cshrc and produces
the error.
Can you give us the output of ls /sw/etc/profile.d? There may be something
in that directory which is causing your problem.
is there
If you have been using dselect, you've been accessing Fink's binary packages.
We only make binary versions of stable packages, and the fact that you
can't find what you're looking for means that under OS X 10.2, the package
has not yet been judged to be stable.
You can still access it though, by
Hi. According to the package database, xdvi is at version 22.64-1 in
both 0.5.0a and current-stable. Also, if you consult
http://telia.dl.sourceforge.net/fink/direct_download/dists/fink-0.5.0a/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/text/
you'll see that the version in the binary distribution is also
Hi. If you find a package with the sourcefile missing, you have two
options: (1) you might try to install the binary version of the package
if it exists, or (2) you can try to locate the source file somewhere on
the internet, download it, and store the .tar.gz file in /sw/src. With
method (2),
Hi. It sounds like you have the unstable trees enabled... Now that 0.5.0a is
out, many users will want to go back an re-edit their /sw/etc/fink.conf
file to remove the unstable items from the Trees line.
I put a new version of gmp, gmp-4.1.1, into the unstable tree yesterday.
I didn't understand
Certainly you need /sw/sbin in your path... Do you not source /sw/bin/init.csh
somewhere in your .login or .cshrc? That should have added both /sw/bin and
/sw/sbin to your path automatically, as well as setting environment variables
that various Fink programs need...
-- Dave
When Fink is installed, it creates a darwin package which corresponds
to the version of the operating system which it is running under.
darwin-6.3-1 would be found on a machine running OS X 10.2.3.
Don't ask how that entry got into the package database: if I knew, I
wouldn't be allowed to tell
Hmmm, I'm not sure why that happened. Do you have a line in /sw/etc/fink.conf
which says Distribution? Is the value 10.1 or 10.2?
-- Dave
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
To find out if your installed version of package foo is stable or not,
compare the information from the packages section of the Fink website
to the output of fink list foo.
If all of your packages are stable, and you wish to stop using the unstable
tree, edit the file /sw/etc/fink.conf and remove
One more question: what is the output of ls -l /sw/fink/dists ?
-- Dave
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-users mailing list
Jay R Wren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
texinfo has a little problem only because most (or all) gnu mirrors no
longer have the texinfo-4.2.tar.gz package, put instead of the patches to
that version from some other previous version. This keeps fink install
texinfo from working because it can't
Let's see... that link was meant to be clicked on in a browser; because
it takes you to a page where you select a sourceforge mirror, and only
after that is the actual file downloaded...
-- Dave
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
Hi Justin. We've had various troubles getting Macaulay to compile and
run properly under gcc3.1. It *should* be possible to install the binary
version from 10.1, but you'll have to be careful to install the 10.1
versions of gc, singular-factory, singular-libfac, gdbm and gmp, as well.
I'm
Dear Fink users,
If you are using the 10.2/unstable tree (for example, because you upgraded
from 10.1 following the jaguar upgrade instructions), please help the
Fink developer team prepare for the upcoming 0.5.0 distribution by letting
us know which packages are working for you, so that they can
If I understand correctly, lixine is one of a very small number of Fink
packages (perhaps the only one) which do *not* work with the standard
xfree86, but require a separately-compiled xfree86 with the threaded
option. On the other hand, the threaded version of xfree86 breaks
some other
I have added a new step (step 5a) to the Jaguar upgrade instructions page
http://fink.sourceforge.net/news/jaguar.php
I hope this will help people avoid some of the problems which have been
occurring recently.
-- Dave
---
This sf.net email
Elias Ponvert wrote:
Yes, that worked great for me, although I installed X from the XDarwin
distribution -- little help to those of us who have installed X via fink.
As announced on Fink's webpage a few hours after Apple released 10.2.2,
you can get the update you need from XonX if you
Okay, so maybe this is a dumb question, but can I use the 10.2
tree with 10.1? Are any of the patches/bugfixes/later versions
applicable? Are they forever off limits unless and until I
upgrade to 10.2?
The reason we separated the two trees is that Apple changed compilers
with the 10.1/10.2
I have fixed the download URL for the eel package.
Run fink selfupdate-cvs and try again.
-- Dave
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
Justin Wright wrote:
I upgraded to 0.4.1 from 0.4.0a this weekend. I am running 10.1, on a TiBook 500.
While attempting to diagnose another problem (now fixed), I ran fix-fink (output
attached).
[snip]
No, the error messages you saw are not normal.
Looking at your output, it appears
The file mpmulti.sty is from the beta version of ppower4. Fink installs
the release version of ppower4, not the beta version. (The beta version is
newer, but has not been tested on Mac OS X.) It's not surprising that the
mpmulti.sty file fails, since it needs the newer version.
-- Dave
I seem to be having problems with octave and tex. When I try to install
Octave, I am forced to choose system-tetex as a dependency. But
system-tetex fails with an error code (1) and the installation script
returns an error exit status 100 code. I have tried to install
tetex-base
On Sep 5,2002 14:18:23 -0400, J. Brian Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
I installed teTex manually, and then tried to reinstall system-teTex,
but I am still getting a configure error. The error is
/sw/var/lib/dpkg/info/sytem-tetex.postinst command not found: ranlib [6]
dpkg then exits
mv: rename /sw/src/root-xfree86-base-4.2.0.1-1/sw/../Applications to
/sw/src/root-xfree86-rootless-4.2.0.1-1/sw/../Applications: No such
file or directory
This *is* affected by linking /sw to another location, because of the leading
/sw in the path.
The version of the fink package manager in
Hello, Fink users. I am looking for feedback on the following packages,
with the hope of moving them to stable prior to the next release:
gd2-2.0.1-4
gtranslator-0.43-1
latex2rtf-1.9.13-1
libpng3-1.2.1-2
rpl-1.4.0-1
surf-1.0.3-1
I am also looking for feedback on the newest versions of the
When I performed installations from source, if a package required something
like imlib, it would depend on the package imlib, which would in turn
depend on imlib-bin and imlib-shlibs. In the binary distro, it appears
that some packages depend directly on the -bin and -shlibs packages,
which
Please install gnome-vfs-dev.
The unstable versions of all packages were updated to require this, but
not yet the stable versions, since the new gnome-vfs is only in unstable.
Generally, if you are using the unstable tree, it is best to list it *first*
in your Trees line in /sw/etc/fink.conf.
I need to utilize the Gtranslator application under OSX (with fink).
I have just made a fink package for gtranslator. You can find it in the
unstable tree, the devel section. (Use fink selfupdate-cvs first.)
-- Dave
___
Don't
The tetex-texmf package is not available as a binary. You must compile it
from source, for licensing reasons.
We realize that this makes things a bit awkward when using apt-get or
dselect. However, the actual compiling step does not take very long
in this instance. You will need to have the
dyld: gnumeric version mismatch for library: /sw/lib/libbonobo.2.dylib
(compatibility version of user: 3.0.0 greater than library's version: 0.0.0)
I'm afraid you are suffering from a problem which is caused when you are
using the bash shell to provide /bin/sh functionality when compiling
Last night I did a fink selfupdate (from CVS), followed by a fink
update-all, and received a number of packages to update,
including lesstif and lesstif-shlibs.
Sweet Josephine, doens't lesstif take a very long time to build
(or is it the shlibs that take a long time to build?). Anyway,
I am looking for feedback on the following fink packages in the unstable
tree (with the precise version number as stated). If you have tested
these, please let me know. If you are willing to test them, you can
copy the .info and .patch files to your local tree and install them.
Several times recently (but not always) when trying to install stuff via
fink (0.4.0),
curl -f -L -s -S -O
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/fink/[some_package].tar.gz
has acquired a corrupt tarfile, which turns out to be an .html file
for a page which involves selecting a mirror
Erik Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, May 12, 2002, at 06:03 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Sourceforge.net changed their setup in a big way, a week or two ago.
All
of the fink package descriptions which specify downloads from
sourceforge
were then modified
fink stores package descriptions on your local machine. Both the stable ones
and the unstable ones are present, and you get to control which of these
is used by means of the Trees line in /sw/etc/fink.conf .
You can update package descriptions when we make a fink release like 0.4.0,
but we make
Anthony Michael Agelastos wrote:
Hello and thank you for your help. I want to install Octave and can't seem
to. Here is what happens. I go to install Octave and the dependencies make
it want to install tetex-base and system-tetex, which are in direct conflict
with each other. Help would be
tetex-base depends on tetex-texmf
system-tetex provides tetex-texmf
tetex-base conflicts with system-tetex
So you have two options:
1) install both tetex-base and tetex-texmf
2) install system-tetex after installing Weirda's distribution.
When you install tetex-base, you are asked to choose
Based on this I have added unstable/main to the end of that line. Should I
have it in front of the line instead?
Usually it won't matter, because we try to make sure that if the same file
is present in both stable and unstable, then they are the same.
But right now, for the benefit of folks
Hi Charlie.
Has everything you mentioned been installed by fink? Do you have TeX
installed, and how was it installed? And what is your PATH?
(Diagnostic questions... trying to figure out what is up...)
Best,
Dave
P.S. I'm copying [EMAIL PROTECTED] on this... It's usually
best to conduct
Charles L. Epstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tex; it was installed via a Mac OS X installer pkg...not
fink. In fact I seem to only have the version of install-info that came
with the tex distribution. My PATH is
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 10:01 PM, Chris Devers wrote:
Is this a glitch with the new splitoff code, or something else? Would it
help to try reinstalling or rebuilding or removing the old version
or...?
Should be fixed in gimp-1.2.3-7
-- Dave
I assume you are using the latest package in stable, lesstif-0.93.18-2.
If you run fink describe lesstif you will see in Usage Notes the solution
to this problem: -force_flat_namespace in your linker flags (usually
SetLDFLAGS in a fink context).
-- Dave
I also looked at this a while back. It will take some effort but I think it
is doable. The problem is that the code is rather old, and doesn't take
advantage of lots of modern tools.
-- Dave
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps some of you perl experts out there can help me with a problem.
I grabbed a module from CPAN and started to make a fink package for it,
so I'm compiling it with fink. It makes some .bundle files, which is
fine. But unfortunately, dyld is finding duplicate symbols between
the different
Brian Morton wrote:
Has anybody seen this error? I just installed gnumeric and all of a
sudden Nedit died. Any ideas on how to fix it?
[localhost:~] brian% nedit
XmManager ClassInitialize: XmeTraitSet failed
Error: attempt to add non-widget child DropSiteManager to parent
nedit which
A new release of the fink package manage, fink-0.9.9, was put into fink's
stable tree a few hours ago. All users are requested to update to this
version as soon as possible. The easiest way is to run fink selfupdate-cvs.
-- Dave
___
Fink-users
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
When a new major version number of a package is released, is it appropriate
to let the maintainer know directly, or should it be treated as a new
package request and submitted to the package request tracker? This has come
up on the beginners-list and I'd like to
In order to build mozilla, you must have the December 2001 Developer Tools
installed.
If you have built mozilla with the October 2001 Developer Tools, you will
not be able to install the .deb, and you must do fink rebuild mozilla
after installing the December 2001 Tools.
HTH,
Dave
In order to build mozilla, you must have the December 2001 Developer Tools
installed.
Let me rephrase that slightly. If you build mozilla with pre-December
Tools, it will build a .deb file but that .deb file cannot be installed.
-- Dave
___
Ronny Wikh wrote:
While trying to install LyX, the following happens when the mandatory
package xdvi
is fetched:
curl -f -L -s -S -O
ftp://ftp.math.berkeley.edu/pub/Software/TeX/xdvi-22.51.tar.gz
curl: (19) xdvi-22.51.tar.gz: No such file or directory.
### curl failed, exit code 19
Any fvwm2 users out there? There is now a fink package for fvwm2-2.4.6 in
the unstable directory. (The latest one in stable is 2.4.3.) Would anybody
like to try it out and let me know if it is OK so I can move to stable?
-- Dave
___
Fink-users
Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
To get system-tetex to update I find that I have to remove lyx,revtex
and natbib, then install them after the update. Is this what I should
expect?
Try fink describe system-tetex. It will reproduce, among other things,
the detailed description, which says in part:
Have a look at question 4.3 in the FAQ.
It identifies the problem, but doesn't tell you how to fix it. However,
since you have wiped out part of your OS X installation, you may need
to reinstall OS X. Does anyone have a less drastic solution?
-- Dave
Marco Nonella wrote:
When I try to update latex2html I get the following patch error:
patch -p1
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/text/latex2html-2K.1beta-7.patch
patching file config/config.pl
Hunk #1 FAILED at 999.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
One more thing: you will have to remove /sw/src/latex2html-2K.1beta.tar.gz
by hand before trying to update again.
-- Dave
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Try fink selfupdate-cvs from the command line. I'm not familiar enough
with dselect to understand what is happening there, but I do know that
dselect is mainly for the binary distribution, and that has not been
updated since the middle of January. There was lots of progress in
fink since then.
Yes. But I intended to say: how much time does usually takes the debugging
process? Just this. And thanks a lot to all fink maintainers.
When a fink package is added to the unstable tree, the fink maintainer
believes that the package is ready to go. But we wait for some positive
feedback from
The fink emacs packages are in the middle of a transition. We used to have
emacs which, as you say, was emacs-20. Now there is a new package
emacs20, which is part of a system to make the various flavors of emacs
interact better with each other.
The auctex package needs one of these new
Dan Shafer wrote:
I know I need to get wxgtk and wxpython-wxgtk loaded. I know these
are in unstable. So I configured fink to see unstables and download
them for me. So far, so good.
But when I tpe:
fink install wxgtk wxpython-wxgtk
I get asked questions about resolving virtual
Michael J. Barber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, February 21, 2002, at 02:04 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
By the way, one of the ways that the fink user community can help is to
look for packages in unstable (either updates of existing packages, or
new packages), copy them
I am pleased to report that we have our first user-contributed item on the
Fink FAQ, appearing as question 6.3 (written by Erik Price).
More contributions would be very welcome. The number of fink developers is
small, and we haven't had time to do much about the documentation. Some
of the
David Craig wrote:
I see the stuff I just copied to /sw/fink/dists/local/main/finkinfo is
all that's in there. Should I leave it there for now? Will I want to
remove it later? (Just wondering if its presence is going to interfere
with updates of these packages in the future, once all this
Justin C. Walker wrote:
I got this at the end of the operation:
(cd /sw/src/root-windowmaker-0.80.0-1/sw/share/man/sk/man1 ; for i in
geticonset getstyle seticons setstyle wdwrite wmaker wmsetbg wsetfont
wxcopy wxpaste ; do mv $i.1x $i.1 ; done )
install -d -m 755
Please update to libmpeg-1.3.1-2 and libmpeg-shlibs-1.3.1-2, which fix this
problem.
Chris Zubrzycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried updating libmpeg, and these are the errors i get (using
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics/libmpeg-
shlibs-1.3.1-1.[info|patch]). I am pretty
Two of us supplied .deb files to fink's mozilla maintainer, who is now
trying to track the problem down.
-- Dave
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
At the moment, gnumeric is available as a package in fink's unstable
tree. (It made a brief appearance in the stable tree yesterday, but
was withdrawn because some of the things it depends on are not yet
in the stable tree.)
To use it, you will need to copy the .info and .patch files for
If you use the new XFree86 v 4.2, together with new versions of the
lesstif and ddd packages available in the post-0.3.2a unstable tree
of fink, everything should work fine. (You get post-0.3.2a files by
running fink self-update and selecting the CVS option.)
If these work for you, please
So, how exactly do I get the post-0.3.2a files? man fink didn't
tell me much, either...
If you chose the CVS option in fink selfupdate, you now have the post-0.3.2a
files. You will have to go into the unstable tree, find the packages
for lesstif and ddd, and copy the .info and .patch files
My question is this: why does gnuplot depend on tetex? The
simple answer, apparently, is so that fink can build and install
the documentation, which comes as LaTeX source.
Actually, the gnuplot package should probably be modified so that it says
BuildDepends: tetex-base , rather than
Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gnumeric crashes for me upong launch. never has been different. But
now also gabber crashes for me when I try to login. Looking at my
stack trace, both crash inside some gtkmm/gnomemm function... I
wonder if there is something deeper going on there...
The problem in the postinstall script is a program called regxpcom, which
was built during the mozilla install but crashes when you try to run it.
Masanori has been aware of this problem for some time. As reported today,
it only seems to be a problem on certain machines. (Mine is one of them.)
301 - 400 of 400 matches
Mail list logo
