[Fink-users] Update for Apple's X11 (was Re: x11 error)

2006-11-14 Thread John Courcoul
Also worthy of mentioning, in case you are using Apple's X11 server, that a new update (1.1.3) came out yesterday and the release notes list correcting some of the font problems discussed on previous posts. J. Courcoul -

Re: [Fink-users] Apple's new X11, v1.1.2

2006-11-02 Thread John Courcoul
On Thursday, November 02, 2006, at 02:22AM, Koen van der Drift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 2, 2006, at 12:16 AM, John Courcoul wrote: Well, look what the cat dragged in... ... If I run the installer, I get a message that my system doesn't need the update (iMac G5, 10.4.8). Maybe

Re: [Fink-users] Apple's new X11, v1.1.2

2006-11-02 Thread John Courcoul
On Friday, November 03, 2006, at 00:53AM, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Koen van der Drift wrote: On Nov 2, 2006, at 10:26 AM, John Courcoul wrote: Given that X11 is an optional install which requires explicit user action to get, I'm surprised that Apple put it up on Software

[Fink-users] Apple's new X11, v1.1.2

2006-11-01 Thread John Courcoul
Well, look what the cat dragged in... For the first time ever, Apple releases an update to its X11 implementation, v1.1.2, as a standalone installer or as part of Software Update for Tiger. According to the release info, it provides GLX stereo visuals and offscreen rendering to GLX Pbuffers

[Fink-users] Wireshark availability for 10.3.x? (was Re: Spread the word.)

2006-08-09 Thread John Courcoul
On Wednesday, August 09, 2006, at 06:51AM, David H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello dear community. This is just another reminder to spread the word. Back links provided to the Package Database or the fink web-site are helpful in spreading the word about Fink. Our latest addition in very

Re: [Fink-users] Wireshark availability for 10.3.x? (was Re: Spread the word.)

2006-08-09 Thread John Courcoul
On Wednesday, August 09, 2006, at 01:13PM, Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/9/06, John Courcoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, August 09, 2006, at 06:51AM, David H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Our latest addition in very popular projects is Wireshark

[Fink-users] Fink with XCode 2.3

2006-05-25 Thread John Courcoul
Apple has recently released the 2.3 updated version of XCode which is recommended for all users of previous versions. Interestingly, no mention of this critical component has appeared on the list thus far. If our source-based Fink installation is up to date (after the CVS issues in the recent

Re: [Fink-users] Ethereal really sluggish after upgrade to 0.10.12

2006-02-20 Thread John Courcoul
Ah, thanks, that did the trick, but only by doing the prebinding on the /sw/lib directory first, to get the libraries done, and then on the bin directory. Even though Steven Butler's suggestion (run /sw/var/lib/fink/prebound/update- package-prebinding.pl ethereal-ssl) still fails afterwards,

[Fink-users] Is ADC becoming non-O.S.S.? Fink repercussions...

2004-11-07 Thread john . courcoul
Am I imagining things, or is Apple turning more into a money-grubbing tightwad? Hadn't visited the Apple Developer Connection website in a while, so I popped in to check what's new. First off, I'm greeted with a new licensing agreement that you must agree to. Then, if I understood everything

[Fink-users] XCode 1.5 compatibility

2004-08-06 Thread John Courcoul
Apple has just released XCode 1.5 on the Developer server. Should we source-based Fink user upgrade as soon as convenient or are there any outstanding issues we should be aware of before switching over ? J. Courcoul --- This SF.Net email is

[Fink-users] Just confirming if XCode 1.2 and Fink 0.7.0 are fully compatible

2004-07-09 Thread John Courcoul
Not finding explicit mention of the fact on the list's archives, just wanted a confirmation that the new release of Xcode, 1.2, is compatible and won't break things in Fink 0.7.0, running on fully-patched Panther 10.3.4 on a PB G4 15/FW800 ? If this is so, would I get any performance or other