Re: [Fink-users] fullscreen applications don't work in urxvt

2010-01-15 Thread Michal Suchanek
2010/1/15 Tomoaki Okayama : > Thanks for sending an explicit patch. This patch makes a link > under /usr, but is it surely ok? Fink should not touch outside > of /sw aside from some exceptions. I think you cannot make this work without touching /usr because the failing applications are preinstalle

Re: [Fink-users] fullscreen applications don't work in urxvt

2010-01-15 Thread Michal Suchanek
2010/1/14 Michal Suchanek : > Hello > > Applications like less, screen, etc require a terminal definition to work. > > I use urxvt (rxvt-unicode) on a remote machine and connect to a mac > over ssh, and the definition is missing there. > > To remedy this issue I installed

[Fink-users] fullscreen applications don't work in urxvt

2010-01-14 Thread Michal Suchanek
Hello Applications like less, screen, etc require a terminal definition to work. I use urxvt (rxvt-unicode) on a remote machine and connect to a mac over ssh, and the definition is missing there. To remedy this issue I installed rxvt-unicode on the mac but the definition is not installed so full

[Fink-users] Please remove screen from fink

2010-01-14 Thread Michal Suchanek
Hello I installed screen 4.0.3-2 on 10.5 and after that sudo would not work in screen. To reproduce: 0) install screen 1) connect through ssh and start screen. Test that sudo works 2) disconnect 3) reconnect and reattach screen sudo now does not work complaining about wrong port or something.

Re: [Fink-users] Troubles making ruby18

2009-04-03 Thread Michal Suchanek
2009/4/3 David R. Morrison : > > On Apr 3, 2009, at 6:47 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > >> >> Ruby 1.8.1 is ancient, has security issues, and should be replaced >> with the ruby from unstable (which iirc somebody promised in the >> package submission for the ruby se

Re: [Fink-users] Troubles making ruby18

2009-04-03 Thread Michal Suchanek
2009/4/3 Alexander Hansen : > You should be able to get this version via the binary distribution: > > sudo apt-get install ruby18 > > Or, I get the same error with openssl098-dev installed, so if you have > that installed, remove it. > > I'll cc the maintainer to see about moving the current packa

[Fink-users] ghc 6.8.2

2008-05-06 Thread Michal Suchanek
Hello to those interested in GHC There is an info file for 6.8.2 in package tracker. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414256&aid=1868481&group_id=17203 It builds for me on 10.4 intel and reportedly fails on 10.5 ppc. If it builds on 10.4 ppc perhaps it could be committed at lea

Re: [Fink-users] [Fink-beginners] Ruby18 build problem on 10.4

2008-04-21 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 19/04/2008, Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 18, 2008, at 10:55 PM, J.T. Halbert wrote: > > > > I have noticed that others have had trouble building Ruby18 on 10.5. > > I am running 10.4.11 and having similar troubles: > > > > -- > > > > stringio.c:

Re: [Fink-users] Build failure: ghc-6.6-2 on 10.5.x

2008-02-18 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 15/02/2008, Thomas Kho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander K. Hansen gmail.com> writes: > > > ... > > basicTypes/OccName.lhs-boot:1:0: > > ~Failed to load interface for `Prelude': > > ~ Use -v to see a list of the files searched for. > > < > samples), > > ~ 95M in use, 0.00 INIT (0.

Re: [Fink-users] Install-time issue with ruby18-1.8.6-p111-1 on 10.5.1

2008-02-16 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 05/02/2008, Jean-François Mertens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 05 Feb 2008, at 02:01, Daniel Macks wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:20:43PM -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote: > >> OS 10.5.1, Xcode 3.0 > >> > >> I get the following when I try to install ruby18: > >> > >> $ fink install ru

[Fink-users] Fwd: Install-time issue with ruby18-1.8.6-p111-1 on 10.5.1

2008-02-05 Thread Michal Suchanek
sorry, my email client requires some list headers to default to list reply -- Forwarded message -- From: Michal Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 5 Feb 2008 14:11 Subject: Re: [Fink-users] Install-time issue with ruby18-1.8.6-p111-1 on 10.5.1 To: Daniel Macks <[EMAIL

Re: [Fink-users] Ruby 1.8.6-p111

2007-11-15 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 08/11/2007, Michal Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Here is an info file for ruby 1.8.6-p111. > > I tested > > * installing ZenTest and sparklines gems > > * rebuilding with ruby 1.8.5-p12 installed > > This version is not linked with

[Fink-users] Ruby 1.8.6-p111

2007-11-08 Thread Michal Suchanek
Hello, Here is an info file for ruby 1.8.6-p111. I will post it to SF once I get my password reset. I always forget it because none of my usual methods of generating memorable passwords works with their dumb restrictions on the characters that can be contained in a one ;-) I tested * installing

Re: [Fink-users] Segmentation fault in ruby18 because of nasty CFLAGS

2007-10-01 Thread Michal Suchanek
Hello On 01/10/2007, Blair Zajac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benedikt Böhm wrote: > > Hi Michal, hi Blair, > > > > i wonder why the ruby18 package in fink has -Os in CFLAGS, it breaks > > quite badly with gcc4 in tiger (and others probably) .. e.g., see > > http://crafterm.net/blog/articles/2006/

Re: [Fink-users] xscorch

2007-05-10 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 10/05/07, Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not that odd: many of the dependencies are brought in as binaries > in the current default mode of fink's operation, and our binaries don't > track BuildDepends. Thus, they aren't chained, so packages can't rely > the BuildDepends

Re: [Fink-users] ruby 1.8.6 package - please test

2007-04-25 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 24/04/07, Michal Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ruby 1.8.6 package for your testing. > > This version of the package tries to minimize the necessary changes to > the build system. > > http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1706631 > > Any comments

[Fink-users] ruby 1.8.6 package - please test

2007-04-24 Thread Michal Suchanek
Ruby 1.8.6 package for your testing. This version of the package tries to minimize the necessary changes to the build system. http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1706631 Any comments welcome. As usual, do not expect the package to appear in fink anytime soon. Every version change of

Re: [Fink-users] fink on macpro's

2006-09-01 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 9/1/06, Chris Zubrzycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Sep 1, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Benjamin Esham wrote: > > > Jean-Francois Donati wrote: > > > >> did anybody get a chance to try fink on the new macpro's? > >> i imagine that the 0.8.1 version