Re: [Fink-users] [fink-core] debfoster missing some necessary fink packages?

2006-12-07 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Dec 6, 2006, at 11:45 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Hi Remi. Chris Z. and I just looked at this again. The property Essential does not even make it into the .deb. We're guessing that your installation is still picking up the info from some

Re: [Fink-users] [fink-core] debfoster missing some necessary fink packages?

2006-12-07 Thread David R. Morrison
Ah, so maybe the solution is to push binaries of the no-longer- essential packages into the bindist? (In current)? (We *do* use current, for the small handful of packages which get updated or added in between bindist releases.) -- Dave On Dec 7, 2006, at 4:18 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:

Re: [Fink-users] [fink-core] debfoster missing some necessary fink packages?

2006-12-07 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi, I had to delete the old fink-prebinding deb from apt's archive and run 'apt-cache gencaches' to get rid of the essential flag in apt- cache. Thus, somehow apt sticks to the essential flag when it is present in any deb, not necessarily in the newest one. Remi On Dec 7, 2006, at 8:29 AM,

Re: [Fink-users] [fink-core] debfoster missing some necessary fink packages?

2006-12-06 Thread David R. Morrison
It is true, however, that cctools-extra, fink-prebinding, and ncurses- shlibs used to be Essential: yes (in the 10.4-transitional tree, for example) but are now Essential: no. It's possible that the warning was accurate, because the user had old versions of those packages installed which

Re: [Fink-users] [fink-core] debfoster missing some necessary fink packages?

2006-12-06 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi Dave, I rebuilt the fink-prebinding package yesterday to make sure that I have the latest deb corresponding to the info file. But apt still complains. I believe the pure presence of the word 'Essential' is enough for apt to treat it as essential. Maybe we should remove the Essential:

Re: [Fink-users] [fink-core] debfoster missing some necessary fink packages?

2006-12-06 Thread David R. Morrison
Hi Remi. Chris Z. and I just looked at this again. The property Essential does not even make it into the .deb. We're guessing that your installation is still picking up the info from some old version of the file. Try running apt-get update to see if that makes it go away? (The old