I want to use rosegarden, and I do not want to install all of kde,
fink install rosegarden uses aRts, which i have.
is there any way to change this setting through command line/aRts/
editing config files?
for midi?
I hope I am coming to the right list.
thank you
===
visite
Álvaro Herrera wrote:
I want to use rosegarden, and I do not want to install all of kde,
fink install rosegarden uses aRts, which i have.
is there any way to change this setting through command line/aRts/
editing config files?
for midi?
I hope I am coming to the right list.
There is no way to
By editing the appropriate line mentioned earlier in the list I was
able to get kdepim3 to build successfully. I also successfully
compiled the rest of KDE 3.3.1 except koffice, so I am reporting this
positive result. I get the same error as Dominique Dhumieres with
koffice. I am waiting
After a couple of days of compiling, the bundle-kde-ssl failed when
installing kdepim3-common-3.3.1.21. I got the same error as others
below:
/usr/bin/install -d -m 755
/sw/src/root-kdepim3-common-3.3.1-21/sw/share/services
/bin/mv
lj Palmer wrote on 28.10.2004 18:34 Uhr:
bundle-kde-ssl 3.3.1-21 will not upgrade. (Has anyone got it to
upgrade properly) I had fileutils installed but have remove it (qt3 has
now updated.)
Positive or Negative response would be appreciated.
Positive - I got everything to upgrade last night.
On Oct 28, 2004, at 3:59 PM, Andreas Dittrich wrote:
lj Palmer wrote on 28.10.2004 18:34 Uhr:
bundle-kde-ssl 3.3.1-21 will not upgrade. (Has anyone got it to
upgrade properly) I had fileutils installed but have remove it (qt3
has now updated.)
Positive or Negative response would be
Alexander K. Hansen wrote on 28.10.2004 22:24 Uhr:
You got kdepim3 to compile? I'm impressed--I've been fighting it for days.
Sorry - I should have been more precise.
I sucessfully upgraded koffice. Will check for kdepim tomorrow, right
now I'm fighting with libxklavier1
Andreas
signature.asc
After about 8 days of compiling I got KDE 3.2.1 working just fine. I
want to thank everyone involved!!
However, I do not have any KDE documentation. When I start the help
app, the menu is shown on the left. When I click on an item in the
menu a message comes up saying that document article
* sinclair44 on Sun, Dec 14, 2003:
On 12/14/03 6:38 AM, Adam Flaherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found that Apple's X11 will not allow KDE from the console, the
Apple X11 users list states that a quartz desktop must be running, does
anybody know if XDarwin will allow a KDE only session?
Try using exec startx
--
Alexander Hansen
Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX
On Dec 15, 2003, at 3:55 AM, Christian Ebert wrote:
* sinclair44 on Sun, Dec 14, 2003:
On 12/14/03 6:38 AM, Adam Flaherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found that Apple's X11 will not allow KDE
In such cases (mv failed) there's usually another, earlier error.
On Monday, December 1, 2003, at 03:43 PM, Robert Forster wrote:
I found the solution in the archives- as Craig Sutherland suggested I
started kcontrol before KDE, and made the change to the show icons
button. After that, KDE
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
In such cases (mv failed) there's usually another, earlier error.
Or it could be the trailing slash bug caused by the Stuffit Pro kext.
--
Martin
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does
I had the same problem, just apt-get'd KDE.
I found that $KDEDIR is not set. So I guessed it should be /sw, and
now I at least have text (setenv KDEDIR /sw). The relevant directory is
$KDEDIR/share/fonts, i.e. /sw/share/fonts. I expected more stuff there
(like the X11R6 fonts dir), but I'll
On Friday, January 3, 2003, at 04:41 am, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Just grab the qt3-3.1.1-2.info and .patch from:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/fink/experimental/
rangerrick/finkinfo/x11/
That doesn't help me, unfortunately. In my case, it repeatedly fails as
follows, even
Alwyn, Benjamin, and
list:
I can verify the
errors that Alwyn has encountered with QT, although I am installing
qt3-shlibs-3.1.1-1. Here ismy output:
install -d -m 755
/sw/src/root-qt3-3.1.1-1/sw/share/doc/qt3install -c -p -m 644 FAQ INSTALL
LICENSE* MANIFEST PLATFORMS README
After two failures installing QT3 with similar outcomes, the QT-3.1.1-2
patches did the trick for me as well. Thanks for the clear instructions on
where to place them. Looking forward to trying the new KDE, once my CPU
cools down enough, after compiling it, to enter the room. Thanks for your
hard
Since it is a 2 hour install, I'll wait for the next .info and .patch from
Benjamin to give it another try.
FYI the /sw/src/root-qt3-3.1.1-1/sw/lib/ directory doesn't contain any
libqt-mt.*.dylib files at the moment of the crash.
So of course nothing can be renamed then.
This is what this
Installation of qt3 just finished successfully with me!
Thanks Benjamin (and others)!
Loek
At 15:50 -0800 03-01-2003, Steve Wright wrote:
The latest info and patch files worked for me!
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 08:41 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 09:24 PM,
Thanks Ben
Built and installed fine
Matt
On Saturday, Jan 4, 2003, at 06:57 Australia/Sydney, Benjamin Reed
wrote:
OK, I've been digging through redhat's specs to see how they handled qt
installation, and apparently it's broken for them too -- they
hand-install everything!
So I took a page
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 09:24 PM, Steve Wright wrote:
Here's my error msg
...
cp -f ../doc/html/xform.png
/sw/src/root-qt3-3.1.1-1../../../../share/doc/qt3/html
This doesn't happen on my setup, but I can only assume at the very list
that install root thing is bad. I've made a
On Monday, September 30, 2002, at 12:30 AM, Joel Hacker wrote:
Actually, he didn't say he wasn't using ANY Norton tools, just that he
wasn't using SystemWorks specifically. I tend to take people at their
literal word and endevour not to draw too many inferences. My
thought is that if
On Sunday, September 29, 2002, at 12:32 AM, Joel Hacker wrote:
On Saturday, September 28, 2002, at 01:37 AM, Steve Wall wrote:
Can't speak for Joel but I don't have Norton SystemWorks installed and
I can't
get aalib to compile either. I posted about this on the 18th
(Subject: aalib
Just for the record aalib now builds fine for Steve, the problem seems
to be it was linking to a older version of aalib during building, and
it doesn't require libslang as those symbols are also defined in aalib.
Matt
On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 08:37 Derek Homeier wrote:
On Sunday,
On Sunday, September 29, 2002, at 06:37 PM, Derek Homeier wrote:
That probably wouldn't help much as he said he is not using any Norton
tools in the first place :-). Moreover, Steve's problem is a simple
linker error, no crashing patch or kernel panics, if I read him
correctly.
On Saturday, September 28, 2002, at 01:37 AM, Steve Wall wrote:
Can't speak for Joel but I don't have Norton SystemWorks installed and
I can't
get aalib to compile either. I posted about this on the 18th
(Subject: aalib Update
for 10.2 Fails) and got no response. I just did a fink
On Thursday, September 26, 2002, at 03:51 PM, Alexander Strange wrote:
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 11:50 PM, Joel Hacker wrote:
Well, patch has frozen twice more, and now I can't even install just
Gimp because aalib fails to compile. This is the glitchiest piece of
garbage I
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 11:05 PM, Joel Hacker wrote:
Kernel panics? Oh, man, now I KNOW I'm not going to bother with KDE
yet. All I want is to run GIMP and what I love most about Mac is
stability, KDE isn't worth it if it means losing that. Anybody had
any luck with
On Thursday, September 26, 2002, at 02:05 AM, Joel Hacker wrote:
Kernel panics? Oh, man, now I KNOW I'm not going to bother with KDE
yet. All I want is to run GIMP and what I love most about Mac is
stability, KDE isn't worth it if it means losing that. Anybody had
any luck with Gnome
On Thursday, September 26, 2002, at 07:13 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
I know a few people who have had stability problems and all of them
use sleep considerably more than I do, it seems that the
power-management stuff makes the system considerably more unstable.
This is all circumstantial,
If you're on Jaguar, the 3.0.2 binaries won't work right, they were
built against 10.1.
Well, you were right up to a point. The 3.0.2 KDE binaries ran fine on
first boot, but afterwards stopped being able to switch themes or use
IceWM but was still able to run GIMP and KOffice (the only two
One thing I forgot to mention: This was accomplished using the 10.2
version of fink, then using fink to install the latest
xfree86-rootless, then making sure that the unstable trees are NOT in
my /sw/etc/apt/sources.list and installing the binaries via apt-get,
not fink. Odds are that if
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 08:09 am, Joel Hacker wrote:
However, since I am superficial I guess I'll be compiling 3.0.7. and
borrow my girlfriends computer for email and internet for the next 18
hours or so.
Do you need to do that? I've only got a PowerMac G4 400, and I was
Do you need to do that? I've only got a PowerMac G4 400, and I was
able to use my computer normally while compiling KDE. Eighteen hours is
about right, though.
Already doing it. To minimize errors and chances of a system freeze
and to make it all go as quickly as possible I decided I will
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:31:37AM -0400, Joel Hacker wrote:
Already doing it. To minimize errors and chances of a system freeze
and to make it all go as quickly as possible I decided I will log in to
text-only mode via console. Maybe it'll take less time this way.
Right now I am
I would actually not recommend performing compiles in text mode
Too late, already started. Besides, I fail to see how the machine
could perform worst without a window manager running than with, but
judging from your signature you probably know what you're talking
about. Nevertheless, as I
Well unfortunately I have no idea exactly how long a compile takes in
text-only mode because when I got home patch had frozen again. I'm
beginning to think that the word unstable is a bit of an
understatement when referring to the 10.2 branch. Had to hard shutdown
to get out of it, ctrl-c
Sorry, should have pressed delete rather than send on that last
message, got a little angry.
No apologies necessary, I was angry too. Fink is not garbage, it's
just not seeming to do as well in 10.2 as it did in 10.1. I apologize
profusely to the fink project team.
My problems do not seem
Kernel panics? Oh, man, now I KNOW I'm not going to bother with KDE
yet. All I want is to run GIMP and what I love most about Mac is
stability, KDE isn't worth it if it means losing that. Anybody had any
luck with Gnome on 10.2.1?
---
38 matches
Mail list logo
