Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.10-1004 Phase Compiling Failed on Leopard 10.5.2

2008-06-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Luke Iannini wrote: > David Glick gmail.com> writes: >> Thanks, I confirmed that fixing the .la file corrected the issue, and >> filed a ticket: >> http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/xquartz/ticket/76 >> >> David > > Hi, even after installing the XQuartz 2.2.2 package, > I was still running in

Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.10-1004 Phase Compiling Failed on Leopard 10.5.2

2008-03-06 Thread Martin Costabel
> I put a symlink in /usr/x11/lib from libXrandr.2.0.0.dylib to > libXrandr.2.dylib and avoided the phase compiling error for gtk+2. > > I would file a bug on xquartz.macosforge.org, but according to the proposed > changes for X11 2.2, they will be using libXrandr 1.2.2, which appears to be >

Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.10-1004 Phase Compiling Failed on Leopard 10.5.2

2008-03-06 Thread Garrett Hyde
> Hello, > > I put a symlink in /usr/x11/lib from libXrandr.2.0.0.dylib to libXrandr.2.dylib and avoided the phase > compiling error for gtk+2. > > I would file a bug on xquartz.macosforge.org, but according to the proposed changes for X11 2.2, they will > be using libXrandr 1.2.2, which appears

Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.10-1004 Phase Compiling Failed on Leopard 10.5.2

2008-03-06 Thread David Glick
>>> >> >> I do have libXrandr; it's just a more recent version than the gtk+2 >> build >> is looking for: >> >> david-glicks-macbook:lib davidg$ ls -la /usr/X11/lib/libXrandr* >> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17 Feb 6 08:54 >> /usr/X11/lib/libXrandr.2.1.0.dylib -> libXrandr.2.dylib >> -rwxr-xr-

Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.10-1004 Phase Compiling Failed on Leopard 10.5.2

2008-03-06 Thread Peter Axup
>Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 19:10:04 + (UTC) >From: David Glick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.10-1004 Phase Compiling Failed on > Leopard 10.5.2 >To: fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-T

Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.10-1004 Phase Compiling Failed on Leopard 10.5.2

2008-03-06 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Thursday 06 March 2008 04:01:21 pm David Glick wrote: > Alexander K. Hansen gmail.com> writes: > > And so you should get the same error--GTK+2 requires libXrandr, > > regardless of who is packaging it. > > > > libXrandr is supposed to be installed with the X11User package, so I > > think you ma

Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.10-1004 Phase Compiling Failed on Leopard 10.5.2

2008-03-06 Thread David Glick
Alexander K. Hansen gmail.com> writes: > And so you should get the same error--GTK+2 requires libXrandr, > regardless of who is packaging it. > > libXrandr is supposed to be installed with the X11User package, so I > think you may have been bitten by a bad X11 update somehow. You might > try

Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.10-1004 Phase Compiling Failed on Leopard 10.5.2

2008-03-06 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
David Glick wrote: > Peter Axup earthlink.net> writes: > > > Hello, > > > > I have a fresh out-of-the-box MacBook running OS X 10.5.2, X11 2.1.4, > > and Xcode 3.0. I have not installed any software except X11, Xcode, > > and some Apple application updates for iTunes, etc. I installed Fink > >

[Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.10-1004 Phase Compiling Failed on Leopard 10.5.2

2008-03-05 Thread Peter Axup
Hello, I have a fresh out-of-the-box MacBook running OS X 10.5.2, X11 2.1.4, and Xcode 3.0. I have not installed any software except X11, Xcode, and some Apple application updates for iTunes, etc. I installed Fink fink-0.28.0 and ran rsync self-update and update all (several times) using F