Martin Costabel wrote: > Koen van der Drift wrote: >>> Since I inadvertently blew away Xcode 3.0 while installing the >>> iPhoneSDK, I'm interested in potential drawbacks. On an intel MBP, >>> ld -v gives: >>> >>> @(#)PROGRAM:ld PROJECT:ld64-82.5 >>> >>> compared to ld-64-77 on my Xcode 3.0 ppc G5 >> >> For me the results are: >> >> xCode3: >> @(#)PROGRAM:ld PROJECT:ld64-77 >> >> iPhone SDK: >> @(#)PROGRAM:ld PROJECT:ld64-82.5 >> >> Both on an iMac G5. > > I would not be surprised if the new version of ld fixed some bugs of the > current version (finding wrong indirect dylibs, for example), but > introduced some fatal new ones. > > What is the situation with the NDA for the iPhone SDK, does it prevent > us from discussing bugs in xcode-3.1 on the fink lists? I'll CC this > question to fink-devel. >
The iPhone SDK and the Xcode-3.1 prerelease are under NDA. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
