Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
What OS are you running? And what methodology are you using? I was
able to install libofx on 10.4 via sudo apt-get install libofx, so
it's there and accessible. If you're trying to fink install it,
then it might not work, since there's apparently no source
[ccing the maintainer for additional info]
On 8/24/05, Steven Stromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
What OS are you running? And what methodology are you using? I was
able to install libofx on 10.4 via sudo apt-get install libofx, so
it's there and accessible.
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
[]
I would suspect that libofx has been deprecated in favor of
libofx1--they replace each other anyway (but the shared libraries can
coexist)--and you should just install that
It seems that someone didn't pay attention there. They obsoleted libofx
in the
Martin Costabel wrote:
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
[]
I would suspect that libofx has been deprecated in favor of
libofx1--they replace each other anyway (but the shared libraries can
coexist)--and you should just install that
It seems that someone didn't pay attention there. They obsoleted
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
[]
I would suspect that libofx has been deprecated in favor of
libofx1--they replace each other anyway (but the shared libraries can
coexist)--and you should just install that
It seems that someone didn't pay
On 8/24/05, Steven Stromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
[]
I would suspect that libofx has been deprecated in favor of
libofx1--they replace each other anyway (but the shared libraries can
coexist)--and you should
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 8/24/05, Steven Stromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
[]
I would suspect that libofx has been deprecated in favor of
libofx1--they replace each other anyway (but the shared libraries can
