Re: [Fink-users] trouble with Octave

2007-10-19 Thread Ben Abbott
Ben Abbott bpabbott at mac.com writes: Ben Abbott wrote: A corrected and Matlab compatible version of residue.m has been checked into the Octave cvs. It is planned to accompany the next release of Octave. Version 2.9.15 (with new residue.m) is out, but not yet here. By the end of

Re: [Fink-users] trouble with Octave

2007-10-19 Thread Jonathan Stickel
Ben Abbott bpabbott at mac.com writes: Ben Abbott wrote: A corrected and Matlab compatible version of residue.m has been checked into the Octave cvs. It is planned to accompany the next release of Octave. Version 2.9.15 (with new residue.m) is out, but not yet here. By

Re: [Fink-users] trouble with Octave

2007-10-19 Thread Ben Abbott
Jonathan Stickel jjstickel at vcn.com writes: I just uploaded info files for octave-2.9.15 and octave-forge-20071014 to the package submission tracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=17203atid=414256 I had previously emailed the developers with these, but they must be busy

Re: [Fink-users] trouble with Octave

2007-10-19 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Ben Abbott wrote: Ben Abbott bpabbott at mac.com writes: Ben Abbott wrote: A corrected and Matlab compatible version of residue.m has been checked into the Octave cvs. It is planned to accompany the next release of Octave. Version 2.9.15 (with new residue.m) is out, but not yet

Re: [Fink-users] trouble with Octave

2007-10-11 Thread Ben Abbott
Ben Abbott wrote: Alexander Hansen wrote: On 9/24/07, Ben Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean-François Mertens-3 wrote: Please redo ! Once is apparently not sufficient .. Or at least check that your equality above is not right! Correct coefficients with you sequence of

Re: [Fink-users] trouble with Octave

2007-09-27 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 9/24/07, Ben Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean-François Mertens-3 wrote: Please redo ! Once is apparently not sufficient .. Or at least check that your equality above is not right! Correct coefficients with you sequence of denominators are -5i/54 , 5i/54 , 2/9 , 2/9 ... if I'm

Re: [Fink-users] trouble with Octave

2007-09-27 Thread Ben Abbott
Alexander Hansen wrote: On 9/24/07, Ben Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean-François Mertens-3 wrote: Please redo ! Once is apparently not sufficient .. Or at least check that your equality above is not right! Correct coefficients with you sequence of denominators are -5i/54 ,

[Fink-users] trouble with Octave

2007-09-24 Thread Ben Abbott
I have both PPC and Intel installations of Octave. They both give the wrong answer to this short script. num = [1 0 1]; den = [1 0 18 0 81]; [a,p,k,e] = residue(num,den) I did the math ... (x^2+1)/(x^4+18*x^2+81) = (2/9)/(x-3i) + (2/9)/(x+3i) + (1/54i)/(x-3i)^2 - (1/54i)/(x+3i)^2 Thus,

Re: [Fink-users] trouble with Octave

2007-09-24 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 23 Sep 2007, at 00:54, Ben Abbott wrote: I have both PPC and Intel installations of Octave. They both give the wrong answer to this short script. num = [1 0 1]; den = [1 0 18 0 81]; [a,p,k,e] = residue(num,den) I did the math ... (x^2+1)/(x^4+18*x^2+81) = (2/9)/(x-3i) +

Re: [Fink-users] trouble with Octave

2007-09-24 Thread Ben Abbott
Jean-François Mertens-3 wrote: Please redo ! Once is apparently not sufficient .. Or at least check that your equality above is not right! Correct coefficients with you sequence of denominators are -5i/54 , 5i/54 , 2/9 , 2/9 ... if I'm not mistaken. Thanks for the correction.