09.04.2012 14:19, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Are events available on embedded, and if so are there any special things
you need to take care of to get them working?
Of course they're available and working out of the box, without any
trickery.
Dmitry
hi all ISQL Version: WI-V2.5.1.26351 Firebird 2.5 Server version: Firebird/linux AMD64 (access method), version "LI-V2.5.2.26448 Firebird 2.5" Firebird/linux AMD64 (remote server), version "LI-V2.5.2.26448 Firebird 2.5/tcp (fbozzy)/P12" Firebird/x86/Windows NT (remote interface), version
On 9-4-2012 12:43, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
09.04.2012 14:19, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Are events available on embedded, and if so are there any special things
you need to take care of to get them working?
Of course they're available and working out of the box, without any
trickery.
Ok, then I
On 04/09/12 15:12, p519446 wrote:
hi all
ISQL Version: WI-V2.5.1.26351 Firebird 2.5
Server version:
Firebird/linux AMD64 (access method), version LI-V2.5.2.26448 Firebird 2.5
Firebird/linux AMD64 (remote server), version LI-V2.5.2.26448 Firebird
2.5/tcp (fbozzy)/P12
On 9-4-2012 13:42, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
09.04.2012 15:24, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Ok, then I need to get digging why some of the event related embedded
tests are failing. I had ignored them previously because of this
stackoverflow post:
Can not connect to any .fdb after stopped heavy OLTP-test (750 connections)
Key: CORE-3811
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3811
Project: Firebird Core
09.04.2012 19:26, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I notice in /jrd/why.cpp (2.5 branch) that a similar named array does
not have the isc_info_sql_relation_alias entry:
static const SCHAR sql_prepare_info2[] =
{
isc_info_sql_stmt_type,
// describe_select_info
isc_info_sql_select,
09.04.2012 20:22, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Isn't aliasname field of XSQLVAR for the relation alias name?..
It's the field alias, IIRC.
Dmitry
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to
-Original Message-
From: Alex Peshkoff [mailto:peshk...@mail.ru]
Sent: Viernes, 06 de Abril de 2012 6:58
I agree here - not good. Currently we have to keep V4 flag in various
forms just to convert datetime_to_text() in different manner.
Only if we
decide to have separate BLR6
