On 02/28/2014 03:21 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
28.02.2014 8:39, Alex wrote:
Please try this patch - if it helps please commit it
It works at first glance, but I'm afraid of possible integer overflow.
Wouldn't be
better to use floating-point operations and then cast to integer before
28.02.2014 12:33, Alex wrote:
May be better use INT64?
It should be big enough here.
Performance counters already use SINT64. Perhaps, it is not for nothing.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Flow-based real-time traffic
I'm trying to build Win32 release build on Windows 8 64 bits using MSVC 2010
Express 32
bits.
12ClCompile:
12 UdrEngine.cpp
12..\..\..\src\plugins\udr_engine\UdrEngine.cpp(418): error C2375:
'Firebird::Udr::fbUdrRegFunction' : redefinition; different linkage
12 c:\users\sd\my
On 02/28/2014 03:36 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
28.02.2014 12:33, Alex wrote:
May be better use INT64?
It should be big enough here.
Performance counters already use SINT64. Perhaps, it is not for nothing.
In that case I'm not afraid of overflow here. Even after * 100.
28.02.2014 13:30, Alex wrote:
In that case I'm not afraid of overflow here. Even after * 100.
Ok, let Dmitry or Vlad commit your patch then - I have no rights.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Flow-based real-time traffic
On 02/28/2014 04:20 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
I'm trying to build Win32 release build on Windows 8 64 bits using MSVC
2010 Express 32
bits.
12ClCompile:
12 UdrEngine.cpp
12..\..\..\src\plugins\udr_engine\UdrEngine.cpp(418): error C2375:
'Firebird::Udr::fbUdrRegFunction' :
On 02/28/2014 04:33 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
28.02.2014 13:30, Alex wrote:
In that case I'm not afraid of overflow here. Even after * 100.
Ok, let Dmitry or Vlad commit your patch then - I have no rights.
No problems - will do it on Monday.
The icu loading issue is fixed in Ubuntu Trusty Tahr 14.04 Firebird 2.5 package
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firebird2.5/2.5.2.26540.ds4-9ubuntu1
14.04 is a LTS release so is important to have a stable firebird2.5 package
On 02/28/2014 04:59 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
28.02.2014 13:41, Alex wrote:
Try to change all 3 in UdrEngine.h from
extern C void fbUdrReg..
to
extern C void ISC_EXPORT fbUdrReg
New API still continue old hell with stdcall?..
That's not part of interface.
28.02.2014 13:41, Alex wrote:
Try to change all 3 in UdrEngine.h from
extern C void fbUdrReg..
to
extern C void ISC_EXPORT fbUdrReg
New API still continue old hell with stdcall?..
Anyway, it doesn't help.
Udr engine is not required for server running, so I can
Fixed.
Regards,
Vlad
--
Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool.
Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer
Customize your own dashboards, set traffic
What is the meaning of subj? 100 is no more data, but 101?..
--
WBR, SD.
--
Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool.
Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow
Hello, All.
Attached patch gives to isc_dsql_fetch(), isc_dsql_execute2() and
isc_dsql_exec_immed2() ability to work with wide result set.
Test application is attached as well.
--
WBR, SD.
why.cpp.diff.7z
Description: Binary data
WideRS.cpp.7z
Description: Binary data
At 04:08 a.m. 1/03/2014, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
What is the meaning of subj? 100 is no more data, but 101?..
101 | 335544366 | segment | Segment buffer length shorter than expected
Something to do with your next Old API and wide result set and a BLOB
sub_type 1?
H
28.02.2014 18:48, Helen Borrie wrote:
At 04:08 a.m. 1/03/2014, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
What is the meaning of subj? 100 is no more data, but 101?..
101 | 335544366 | segment | Segment buffer length shorter than expected
It seems to be something different.
Something to do with your
28.02.2014 22:06, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Isn't it related to the READ/WRITE BLOB commands, which was removed from v3?
It looks so. Blob errors could be priorly returned from DSQL API calls
only in case of these commands, but now this should not happen.
Dmitry
On 28/02/2014 12:08, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
What is the meaning of subj? 100 is no more data, but 101?..
Isn't it related to the READ/WRITE BLOB commands, which was removed from v3?
Adriano
--
Flow-based
28.02.2014 19:19, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
28.02.2014 22:06, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Isn't it related to the READ/WRITE BLOB commands, which was removed from v3?
It looks so. Blob errors could be priorly returned from DSQL API calls
only in case of these commands, but now this
18 matches
Mail list logo