On 08/11/14 22:29, Tom Coleman wrote:
I interface a proprietary language with Firebird, Oracle, and Sybase/MS-SQL.
There is never any case where I would want to see std:exception.
Could it be time to start thinking about burying this idea that is looking
more and more like a sacred cow?
On 08/12/14 01:41, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
11.08.2014 21:43, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
You told before (and now) as y-valve is part of each provider. That's
not true.
Not true even that I ever told that. Read carefully and you'll see that I
name
completely separate parts:
Can't install - Windows 8.1 Pro
---
Key: CORE-4517
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4517
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Installation
Affects Versions: 2.5.3
On 08/11/14 22:40, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 11/08/2014 15:29, Tom Coleman wrote:
I interface a proprietary language with Firebird, Oracle, and Sybase/MS-SQL.
There is never any case where I would want to see std:exception.
Could it be time to start thinking about burying this
12.08.2014 9:50, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Police classes seem to be ideal for exception type control.
I just wonder how these police classes can find out a way to store status
into custom
user-made class.
Say, I have in application Firebird exception class with following members:
gdscode,
53e9b621.5050...@mail.ru
Message-ID: e1539af719bd359c5254c41730071...@imap.procolix.com
X-Sender: m...@lawinegevaar.nl
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.2
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:37:21 +0400, Alex Peshkoff peshk...@mail.ru
wrote:
On 08/11/14 22:29, Tom Coleman wrote:
I interface a proprietary
On 08/12/14 12:07, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
12.08.2014 9:50, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Police classes seem to be ideal for exception type control.
I just wonder how these police classes can find out a way to store status
into custom
user-made class.
Say, I have in application Firebird
Mark,
A good post as this sums up the issue. I only hope that the core team
are listening as what happens to a project when the developers ignore
the users?
On 12/08/14 09:13, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
The main point of an API is to allow developers to*use* Firebird, so
please do not alienate
On 08/12/14 12:13, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
53e9b621.5050...@mail.ru
Message-ID: e1539af719bd359c5254c41730071...@imap.procolix.com
X-Sender: m...@lawinegevaar.nl
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.2
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:37:21 +0400, Alex Peshkoff peshk...@mail.ru
wrote:
On 08/11/14 22:29, Tom
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:18:31 +0400, Alex Peshkoff peshk...@mail.ru
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:37:21 +0400, Alex Peshkoff peshk...@mail.ru
wrote:
On 08/11/14 22:29, Tom Coleman wrote:
I interface a proprietary language with Firebird, Oracle, and
Sybase/MS-SQL.
There is never any case
Show in trace new counters have been added to the MON$RECORD_STATS
--
Key: CORE-4518
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4518
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type:
Hello, All.
Is there a simple step-by-step guide how to add new error codes and
corresponding
messages into the engine and firebird.msg?
--
WBR, SD.
--
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
12.08.2014 15:51, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
1) Choose the facility for your error
How to choose between JRD and DSQL?
--
WBR, SD.
--
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:51:36 +0400, Dmitry Yemanov firebi...@yandex.ru
wrote:
12.08.2014 17:34, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Is there a simple step-by-step guide how to add new error codes and
corresponding
messages into the engine and firebird.msg?
1) Choose the facility for your error
2)
12.08.2014 18:03, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Doesn't this miss a add specific standard (or vendor-specific) SQL state
somewhere?
It's hidden inside item (3) ;-)
Dmitry
--
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
On 08/12/14 13:55, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:18:31 +0400, Alex Peshkoff peshk...@mail.ru
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:37:21 +0400, Alex Peshkoff peshk...@mail.ru
wrote:
On 08/11/14 22:29, Tom Coleman wrote:
I interface a proprietary language with Firebird, Oracle, and
On Aug 12, 2014, at 2:35 AM, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 08/11/14 23:57, Tom Coleman wrote:
On Aug 11, 2014, at 3:36 PM, Jim Starkey wrote:
You may be more interested in why something failed than just that it failed.
An error mechanism should play nicely with the status vector to expose as
On 08/12/14 19:43, Tom Coleman wrote:
On Aug 12, 2014, at 2:35 AM, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 08/11/14 23:57, Tom Coleman wrote:
On Aug 11, 2014, at 3:36 PM, Jim Starkey wrote:
You may be more interested in why something failed than just that it
failed.
An error mechanism should play nicely
Mark, this is how I think we got here. There is a compelling need to export
engine semantics of UDFs and other types of plugins. The obvious -- and
desireable way -- to do this is with abstract objects. Since there also needed
some minor work on primary interface, it seemed logical to unite
Sigh. There used to be database based system to create and edit messages and
generate header and message files. Very handy using a database to develop a
database system.
On Aug 12, 2014, at 9:34 AM, Dimitry Sibiryakov s...@ibphoenix.com wrote:
Hello, All.
Is there a simple
On Aug 12, 2014, at 1:11 PM, Jim Starkey j...@jimstarkey.net wrote:
My position is that the external interface (the API) should remain y-valve
and handle oriented, extended as needed. An interface for export engine
semantics, however, has different requirements and can and should be
12.08.2014 18:17, Jim Starkey wrote:
There used to be database based system to create and edit messages and
generate header and message files.
Yes, I know that because I am exactly that guy who killed this system
because database
isn't suitable for CVS.
--
WBR, SD.
On Aug 12, 2014, at 2:37 AM, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 08/11/14 22:29, Tom Coleman wrote:
I interface a proprietary language with Firebird, Oracle, and Sybase/MS-SQL.
There is never any case where I would want to see std:exception.
Could it be time to start thinking about burying this
On Aug 12, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Jim Starkey wrote:
I haven't a clue how this can be sorted out.
I have a suggestion.
Clearly this New Interface issue is complex and critical and is going to take
some time to sort out.
Why not focus on getting FB 3 out the door as a release - API as is - and
On Aug 12, 2014, at 1:17 PM, Jim Starkey j...@jimstarkey.net wrote:
Sigh. There used to be database based system to create and edit messages and
generate header and message files. Very handy using a database to develop a
database system.
Please lets not get into the moral and
Hi Dimitry,
May I ask why you say a database system is not suitable for CVS? I had
ours on cvs for a few years before moving it to git.
If you view the operational database as source code, then I can understand
your point, but, I view an operational database as a compiled end product
while the
On 12-8-2014 19:22, Dalton Calford wrote:
May I ask why you say a database system is not suitable for CVS? I had
ours on cvs for a few years before moving it to git.
If you view the operational database as source code, then I can
understand your point, but, I view an operational database as
Hi Mark,
If I understand your message, I am still confused by the statement.
I would never, ever put a binary such as a database or compiled executable
into a version control system, but, there is nothing preventing my
extracting the DML
(insert into foo .values..) and inserting that
On 12-8-2014 19:37, Dalton Calford wrote:
If I understand your message, I am still confused by the statement.
I would never, ever put a binary such as a database or compiled
executable into a version control system, but, there is nothing
preventing my extracting the DML
(insert into foo
12.08.2014 19:37, Dalton Calford wrote:
I would never, ever put a binary such as a database or compiled executable
into a version
control system, but, there is nothing preventing my extracting the DML
(insert into foo .values..) and inserting that into the version
control system.
12.08.2014 19:54, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Later I'll improve it for C and FPC and put in my github.
Don't forget about Java and C#.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
On 12/08/2014 14:59, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
12.08.2014 19:54, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Later I'll improve it for C and FPC and put in my github.
Don't forget about Java and C#.
I'll not forget, if I want to do.
Adriano
On 12-8-2014 19:59, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
12.08.2014 19:54, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Later I'll improve it for C and FPC and put in my github.
Don't forget about Java and C#.
I don't think those are directly relevant. I would think that the only
people who would ever use a
On Aug 12, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 12-8-2014 18:48, Tom Coleman wrote:
One bias of mine that I will confess to is that I hate C++. Every time I
am forced to use it it turns out to be a horrible PITA. The last project I
wrestled with was an interface from our
12.08.2014 20:41, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Don't forget about Java and C#.
I don't think those are directly relevant. I would think that the only
people who would ever use a direct interface from Java and C# are Jiri
and me, all normal application developers will simply use the JDBC
driver
Am I correct to understand, that in the C API isc_dsql_prepare_m will
allow me to specify the database information items to request together
with the statement prepare, allowing me to circumvent the allocation and
handling of XSQLDA, and instead gives we a response buffer that I can
process
On 12/08/2014 16:17, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Am I correct to understand, that in the C API isc_dsql_prepare_m will
allow me to specify the database information items to request together
with the statement prepare, allowing me to circumvent the allocation and
handling of XSQLDA, and instead
On 12-8-2014 21:24, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 12/08/2014 16:17, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Am I correct to understand, that in the C API isc_dsql_prepare_m will
allow me to specify the database information items to request together
with the statement prepare, allowing me to circumvent
On 12/08/2014 17:01, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 12-8-2014 21:24, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 12/08/2014 16:17, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Am I correct to understand, that in the C API isc_dsql_prepare_m will
allow me to specify the database information items to request together
with the
Restoring a Firebird 2.5 database freezes at Committing Metadata in Windows
8.1
-
Key: CORE-4519
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4519
Project: Firebird
40 matches
Mail list logo
