> Jiri Could you do some tests on a smb 3 share with Firebird ?
I don't have a device with SMB3 support or Windows 2012 machine. I can install
it to VM, but that's not going to show valuable data, I think.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
> I do not see SMB 2 as an appropriate for use for database functions.
I was confused by SMB2/2.1 as well. I thought it might be good to investigate
what they are doing (preventing problems, how the share is opened, ...).
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
On 9/24/2014 4:14 PM, Leyne, Sean wrote:
> Finally, to compare the Firebird project against MySQL is not fair --
> MySQL/Percona is able to leverage the significant licensing revenue
> which their ownership of the GPL code provides (no commercial product
> will ship without a non-GPL license for
Tom,
> We're almost in October and the FB3 beta release date still shows as August
> 31.
>
> SMB 3, memory management, etc., etc - all very interesting discussions but
> how are they leading to the highly-anticipated and much needed beta
> release?
While I appreciate your frustration at the late
24.09.2014 19:39, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>
> Beta release is expected the next week.
Correction: Beta *code* is expected to be ready (i.e. tagged) the next
week. The release itself will appear slightly later, after composing the
docs and passing QA.
Dmitry
Wonderful!
Would it be a good idea to update the tracker with this information and create
some excitement?
On Sep 24, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 24.09.2014 19:33, Tom Coleman wrote:
>>
>> We're almost in October and the FB3 beta release date still shows as
>> August 31.
>>
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:43:52 -0300, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
wrote:
> On 24/09/2014 12:33, Tom Coleman wrote:
>>
>>
>> Apologies for sounding like a broken record.
>>
>>
> Apologies not accepted from me!
>
> You still not said in how manner (money, tests, *useful* comments) you
> are contribu
On 24/09/2014 12:33, Tom Coleman wrote:
>
>
> Apologies for sounding like a broken record.
>
>
Apologies not accepted from me!
You still not said in how manner (money, tests, *useful* comments) you
are contributing to this release.
Adriano
--
24.09.2014 19:33, Tom Coleman wrote:
>
> We're almost in October and the FB3 beta release date still shows as
> August 31.
>
> SMB 3, memory management, etc., etc - all very interesting discussions
> but how are they leading to the highly-anticipated and much needed beta
> release?
Beta release is
We're almost in October and the FB3 beta release date still shows as August 31.
SMB 3, memory management, etc., etc - all very interesting discussions but how
are they leading to the highly-anticipated and much needed beta release?
Let's focus, gentlemen. Please.
P.S.
Java's outstanding succ
On 09/22/14 19:50, Nikolay Samofatov wrote:
> The best way to speed it up for small blocks allocation in Firebird 2.5
> allocation algorithm IMO is
> to replace BTree with custom array.
> Number of elements if freelist BTree is limited, and custom structure would
> speed up small block
> allocat
`
> The why is explained by users , There are a lot of nas/raid devices that can
> be
> used for db storage also for clustering (cold standby)
>
> Jiri Could you do some tests on a smb 3 share with Firebird ?
>
> http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3915
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:00
24.09.2014 14:58, marius adrian popa wrote:
> The why is explained by users , There are a lot of nas/raid devices that can
> be used for
> db storage also for clustering (cold standby)
I bet that it is much easier to find NAS which support iSCSI or NFS. Do you
know a
popular SMB-only NAS dev
The why is explained by users , There are a lot of nas/raid devices that
can be used for db storage also for clustering (cold standby)
Jiri Could you do some tests on a smb 3 share with Firebird ?
http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3915
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Dimitry Sibiryako
24.09.2014 10:44, Jiří Činčura wrote:
> Maybe we can investigate how are they doing it and how reliable it is and
> what are the gotchas.
For the beginning it would be enough "what it is good for". The post is
describing
"how" but say no word about "why".
--
WBR, SD.
--
http://blogs.technet.com/b/josebda/archive/2011/02/24/sql-over-smb2-one-of-the-top-10-hidden-gems-in-sql-server-2008-r2.aspx
Maybe we can investigate how are they doing it and how reliable it is and what
are the gotchas.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
